False claims spread six times faster than the truth, according to a 2023 MIT study. This imbalance makes debunking misinformation an exhausting battle. A concept known as Brandolini’s Law explains why.
“The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.”
In 2013, programmer Alberto Brandolini stated that disproving nonsense takes far more energy than creating it. This principle, also called the “bullshit asymmetry principle,” affects professionals fighting misinformation daily.
Engineers, designers, and fact-checkers face this challenge. False claims demand time and effort to refute, while bad information spreads effortlessly. The digital world amplifies this problem.
Understanding this law helps professionals develop better strategies. The next sections will explore practical ways to counter misinformation efficiently.
Understanding Brandolini’s Law
Debunking false claims requires ten times more effort than creating them, a reality many professionals face daily. This imbalance, known as the bullshit asymmetry principle, highlights why misinformation thrives. Engineers, scientists, and journalists often spend hours dismantling claims made in minutes.
The Bullshit Asymmetry Principle Explained
Alberto Brandolini’s metaphor captures the struggle: “Arguing with a misinformation spreader is like playing chess with a pigeon. It knocks over pieces, struts around, and declares victory.” The energy needed to refute nonsense dwarfs the effort to create it.
In 2013, programmer Alberto Brandolini coined the term while observing online debates. Unlike Hitchens’ Razor—which shifts the burden of proof to the claimant—his law emphasizes the energy needed to correct falsehoods.
A 2024 Edelman Trust Report found 68% of engineers encounter weekly misinformation. Ultracrepidarianism—non-experts opining on technical topics—fuels this trend.
Ultracrepidarianism: an ultracrepidarian—from ultra- (“beyond”) and crepidarian (“things related to shoes”)—is a person considered to have ignored this advice and to be offering opinions they know nothing about. It is first attested in the English essayist William Hazlitt’s 1819 open “Letter to William Gifford”, the editor of the Quarterly Review: “You have been well called an Ultra-Crepidarian critic.” The editor of Hazlitt’s writings, however, offers that it might have been coined by Charles Lamb instead It was picked up four years later in Hazlitt’s friend Leigh Hunt’s 1823 satire Ultra-Crepidarius: A Satire on William Gifford. Occasionally the word ultracrepidarianism—the act or general practice of speaking beyond one’s knowledge—was used similarly later. (source: Wikipedia)
Why Fake Information Spreads Faster Than Truth
Neuroscience reveals why people share unverified claims faster than factual corrections. The brain favors cognitive ease—quick, emotionally charged content over complex truths. Social media exploits this bias, turning misinformation into a wildfire.
Fabricating false claims takes minimal effort. Debunking them demands exhaustive research. The Boeing 787 myth claimed composite materials were unsafe. The FAA spent weeks refuting it, while the rumor spread globally in hours.
- 74% of retweets happen without link verification.
- Facebook users average 3 seconds reviewing facts before sharing.
Social Media’s Role in Amplifying Misinformation: algorithms prioritize engagement, not accuracy. Sensational claims earn clicks, drowning out nuanced corrections. The attention economy fuels this cycle. Engineers and designers battle specs against viral fiction—where bullshit travels light, and truth carries baggage.
The rest of this article is reserved for members
To limit scraping bots (currently 40,000 hits per day!),
we had to restrict access to full articles and tools to registered members only.
to access all the rest.
