Product Design, Manufacturing & Innovation Resources
Home » TRIZ 40 Inventive Principles and Contradiction Matrix

TRIZ 40 Inventive Principles and Contradiction Matrix

1970
  • Genrich Altshuller
Engineering team analyzing TRIZ 40 Inventive Principles and Contradiction Matrix in a modern office.

(generated image for illustration only)

A core TRIZ toolset for resolving technical contradictions, where improving one system parameter worsens another: the 40 principles are generic inventive strategies derived from patent analysis while the Contradiction Matrix is a table that maps standard engineering parameters against each other, suggesting which of the 40 principles are most likely to provide a solution for a specific conflict.

The 40 Inventive Principles and the Contradiction Matrix are foundational elements of classical TRIZ, developed by Genrich Altshuller and his colleagues after analyzing over 40,000 patents. They observed that the same fundamental problems and solutions appeared across different fields of technology. The core idea is to systematically overcome ‘technical contradictions’. A technical contradiction occurs when an attempt to improve one characteristic of a system (e.g., speed) leads to the degradation of another (e.g., reliability).

Altshuller identified 39 standard system parameters, such as ‘Weight of moving object’, ‘Strength’, ‘Temperature’, and ‘Productivity’. The Contradiction Matrix is a 39×39 grid where the rows represent the parameter to be improved and the columns represent the worsening parameter. At the intersection of a specific row and column, the matrix provides numbers corresponding to the most frequently used Inventive Principles for that type of contradiction in the patent database. For example, to solve a contradiction between ‘Strength’ (improving) and ‘Weight of stationary object’ (worsening), the matrix might suggest principles like #1 (Segmentation), #10 (Preliminary Action), or #40 (Composite Materials). The principles themselves are abstract heuristics, such as ‘Segmentation’ (divide an object into independent parts), ‘Asymmetry’ (make an object asymmetrical), or ‘Universality’ (make a part perform multiple functions). This structured approach transforms a specific, difficult problem into a general problem, finds a general solution using the principles, and then adapts that general solution back to the specific context, bypassing psychological inertia and trial-and-error.

UNESCO Nomenclature: 3322
– Systems design engineering

Type

Abstract System

Disruption

Revolutionary

Usage

Niche/Specialized

Precursors

  • patent classification systems
  • dialectical logic (concept of thesis, antithesis, synthesis)
  • systems thinking and cybernetics

Applications

  • samsung’s development of thinner tvs without compromising structural integrity
  • intel’s chip manufacturing process improvements
  • procter & gamble’s product design for packaging and functionality
  • nasa’s problem-solving for space exploration challenges
  • boeing’s aerospace design innovations

Patents:

NA

Potential Innovations Ideas

Due to scrapping bot traffic, currently more than 40k per day, this content is reserved to community members.
> Login < or > Register < (100% free) to access this, so as all other restricted content and tools.

Related to: TRIZ, 40 inventive principles, contradiction matrix, Genrich Altshuller, technical contradiction, problem solving, innovation, engineering methodology, patent analysis, system parameters.

Historical Context

TRIZ 40 Inventive Principles and Contradiction Matrix

1970
1970
1970
1970
1974
1974
1978
1970
1970
1970
1970
1972
1974
1975-06-01
1980

(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)

Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles

Full size images and downloads are only available, 100% free, for registered members.

> Login <