HomeProduct DesignDesign Tips20 Best Tips to Design for Cleanability

20 Best Tips to Design for Cleanability

In some industries, Design for Cleanability is just a must (food, medical), in all others, you may just want your product to be and maintain clean during its usage. This article reviews traditional and innovative design tips and recommendations.

To start with a famous joke: “only dirty people need a shower” … while everybody would find it ridiculous on humans, it should be the same on products.

Do NOT expect your products to be maintained clean because you produced them clean and you ask to take care in the Instruction For Use. Design for it + provide the means for it!

It is part of the product quality perception and will have an immediate impact on your market.

Foreword: cleanness versus disinfection

Cleanness has to be distinguished from disinfection:

  • Cleanness: absence of deposits of any size (usually visible ones, but grease films or small dust can be invisible)
  • Disinfection: absence of livings germs of any king (usually invisible ones, although fungus or similar may be visible)

It is commonly said that

disinfection can NOT be obtained on a non previously cleaned object

Good-to-know: the industrial cleaning industry refers to the “clean triangle” –> the combined action of the 3 factors: temperature + chemicals + movement –> you can decrease somehow one of the parameters by increasing one or two others. Example: adding movement, jets, or bubbling in a product cleaning bath while decreasing chemical concentration.

Good to know: while most of the materials (dirt) get softer or even liquid when the temperature rises, starch is one of the rare exceptions. So mind your cleaning or disinfection method in this case.

Clean by Design

instead of clean by user effort, by owner effort or … not cleaned at all

A small (not good) example as a start: a plane ventilation system interface in the passenger area. Although the planar surfaces were cleaned by the company, obviously the recesses areas are … well … we let you judge:

too small inner radius impossible to clean
too small inner radius impossible to clean
texture vs cleanness
texture vs cleanness

Surface roughness

Whether is if mandatory of the production process or an end-user feature, clearly here some compromises have to be made, as some roughness may be required for the product to look & age well.

 

 

Minimal inner radius

better avoid such recess and small radius
better avoid such recess and small radius
impossible to clean spoon
impossible to clean spoon

See the example on this metal forming or the plastic molded plane cockpit above of what to avoid.

Even in public restaurants like this silver twisted spoon on the right. The design to cleanness was likely not in the specifications.

The objective is to be accessible to the intended cleaning method. The bigger the better, but as a rule of thumb, the minimum inner radius should conform to:

  • ≥ 2 mm if cleaned by automatic CIP (Cleaning in Place) with some jets
  • ≥ 3-4 mm if cleaned with some brushes
  • ≥ 8 mm if hand cleaned
clearances
clearances

Well-adjusted parts (you think)

Less is More is fully applicable here. Do limit the number of different parts as much as possible – refer to all articles on value analysis for that -.

Every gap or interstice between parts will be subject to cleanness problems. In most cases, do not rely on the quality of the assembly, even a good produced part will have some interstice.

 

 

self draining design
self-draining public seat design

Self-draining design

 

Seems basic, but one of the most forgotten aspects. It is so easy to involuntary design a “rain collector”! Dust, dirt & potentially corrosion will just follow.

Particularly for

  • medical
  • food
  • public equipment
  • but also individual kitchen or toilet equipment
access could be improved
access could be improved

Accessible or Interchangeable parts

Parts or components but be accessible

In order to maintain them clean easily. This is obtained by either:

  • good access: both openings and space between the sub-assemblies if cleaning is required
  • single-use components: typically a patient medical probe. The ability to clean is then just avoided. From a manufacturer and designer point of view: it usually requires much more investment and volumes but then generates after-sells
  • removable parts to ease its cleaning: -the best practice- Used usually mainly on good home appliances, this can be applied to almost all other industries when some area can not be cleaned or when total product is either too big or fragile. 

Opinion: we believe that although markets have moved over the last decade to more single-use components due to the ease of use and lower initial investment, both ecological aspects so as total ownership cost and feeling of waste will invert this tendency

  • more long-lasting glass instead of plastics
  • more usage of refill jars, box & containers (end-user food industry)
  • back to some metal parts, better integrated with plastic

Design for Cleanability examples (or not)

Microwave integrated handle
Microwave integrated handle

Microwave door handle

A quality microwave with one small Design for Cleanability exception

The handle opening is lean and included/recessed in the door frame. Looks nice and would have a good value analysis.

Also, ergonomics is great (hand width and thickness + function location is visible enough)

… but to notice is dust or liquid collector. A large bottom opening would have likely added some mold complexity and cost but would have permitted to limit the wash, and when done wash easier

cast iron tile
cast-iron tile

Cast-iron tile

Looks great, thick, heavy, and of high quality … if it was not open to the top and placed everywhere in that public restaurant. “Designed by recesses” one could say.

A good example where choice has to be made, in this example visual against the ability to clean and maintain clean (More than 20 meters long of such tiles in that restaurant)

Solutions here: cast some transparent resin in the gaps to have a flat surface? or cover it with glass and seal it on the side? or not seal but remove it from time to time to clean?

 

Hospital Handrail example
Hospital Handrail example

The hospital handrail

A typical example where cleanness is(should?) the 2nd Function, just after “strength to support the patient”.

 

Have a look at all the detailed pictures in the gallery. Can be challenged:

  • the support fixtures to the wall: screw holes, screw openings, spacing around to let an automatic screwdriver and avoid angle. Furthermore, the support shape is machined from an aluminum profile: the shape is made with a recess so that it applies firm to the wall, but that lets an open space on both sides
  • tube ends: is it supposed to end like that or are the ends not existing or missing? Nevertheless, prone to dirt and impossible to clean, if not invaded by aliens (chewing gum in this case)
  • bottom groove: permits to place the support at any place and to join bar ends without additional machining … at a cost of a completely noncleanable area (yes it seems to be a plastic cover for that groove … just making more non-perfectly closed volumes)

All these can be solved, but for sure at some design cost + possibly some mounting efficiency cost.

Other Examples

Self-cleaning materials

Both an old and new technology

For sure a very innovative sector to help in Design for Cleanability, with the best yet to come with nano-technologies. A mix of physics & chemistry, with plenty of technics and applications.

  • the glass used for modern buildings has developed some self-cleaning coatings
  • copper has some natural anti-bacterial properties known for a long time. But be careful with some association lobbying on that. Also, the easy corrosion of pure copper or alloys may supersede this advantage in some conditions
  • titanium oxide deposits. by light catalytic effect. Trending!
  • chemicals included in the compound in injected plastics. Mind the change of the plastic properties, so as aging & discoloration of the surfaces.

Important note: mind that it’s not a too-well mature sector yet. Some aspects of self-cleaning materials are not well documented yet:

  • not selecting some germs & letting others prosper even faster?
  • not increasing resistance of germs, leading to a future disaster?
designed for cleanness
designed for cleanness

Summary

Here more than elsewhere, forms follow function (fff) and forms make function (maintain clean) are keys.

Most of the time at the cost of only more thinking on the CAD, and frequently producing even cheaper products (fewer parts to produce + fewer parts to assemble!)

And last least: use the color trick when acceptable! some mid-dark colors or grey make dirt not-so-visible. This is of course not the main recommended approach in Design for Cleanability as it is not cleaning but hiding, but could be a complementary way to go in some products.

RELATED ARTICLES
Search
Exact matches only
include Online Tools
include Events

WIKI / PARTICIPATE !

Share suggestions, corrections,  examples, experience or ideas that may be integrated in this article

NEW / UPDATED

3 Great Benefits of Color Coding in Product Design

Product designers and marketers can use color coding for 3 reasons: to convey a message, to convey a...

Gas Cylinder Manufacture

Made by extruding metal dies, either by cold or hot forming, the gas cylinders initially made of steel,...

PCB Manufacturing in China

Good explanation on PCB manufacturing, from order intake to control and packaging, achieving the impressive KPIs of total delivery...

Quadcopter mini drone design review

When lightweight is not just a cost optimization but the main criteria of the product to function. Can...

Great 10 Logo Design Tips You Will Use

A great video from Aaron Draplin & LinkedIn Learning about logo design, and the necessary ideas and concepts...

UPCOMING EVENTS

This site is proudly hosted by

We recommend them for the features and their extremely reactive support
Check by yourself - FREE