The repeatability limit, \(r\), is a critical value derived from the repeatability standard deviation (\(s_r\)). It represents the maximum expected absolute difference between two single test results, obtained under repeatability conditions, with a 95% probability. It is commonly calculated as \(r = 2.8 \times s_r\). If the difference exceeds \(r\), the results are considered suspect.
Repeatability Limit (stats)
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
The repeatability limit provides a practical tool for judging the acceptability of two test results. Its statistical foundation lies in the properties of the normal distribution. The difference between two measurements drawn from the same normal distribution with standard deviation \(s_r\) is also normally distributed with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of \(\sqrt{s_r^2 + s_r^2} = \sqrt{2}s_r\). To encompass 95% of these differences, we use a coverage factor. For a normal distribution, this factor is approximately 1.96. Therefore, the 95% limit is \(1.96 \times \sqrt{2} \times s_r \approx 2.77s_r\), which is often rounded to \(2.8s_r\) for simplicity in standards like ISO 5725.
A more precise calculation uses the Student’s t-distribution, especially when \(s_r\) is estimated from a small number of measurements. The formula becomes \(r = t_{(1-\alpha/2, \nu)} \times \sqrt{2} \times s_r\), where \(t_{(1-\alpha/2, \nu)}\) is the critical value from the t-distribution for a confidence level of \(1-\alpha\) (e.g., 95%) and \(\nu\) degrees of freedom used to estimate \(s_r\). In practice, if a lab runs two tests on the same sample and the difference is greater than \(r\), it’s a signal to investigate potential issues like procedural errors, sample contamination, or instrument malfunction.
Type
Disruption
Usage
Precursors
- Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson’s development of confidence intervals in the 1930s
- The Student’s t-distribution published by William Sealy Gosset (‘Student’) in 1908
- The ISO 5725 standard on accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results
Applications
- checking the consistency of duplicate measurements in a laboratory
- defining performance specifications for analytical instruments
- quality control charts for monitoring process stability
- regulatory compliance in pharmaceutical and environmental testing
- resolving disputes between two measurements of the same sample
Patents:
Potential Innovations Ideas
Professionals (100% free) Membership Required
You must be a Professionals (100% free) member to access this content.
AVAILABLE FOR NEW CHALLENGES
Mechanical Engineer, Project or R&D Manager
Available for a new challenge on short notice.
Contact me on LinkedIn
Plastic metal electronics integration, Design-to-cost, GMP, Ergonomics, Medium to high-volume devices & consumables, Regulated industries, CE & FDA, CAD, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, medical ISO 13485
We are looking for a new sponsor
Your company or institution is into technique, science or research ?
> send us a message <
Receive all new articles
Free, no spam, email not distributed nor resold
or you can get your full membership -for free- to access all restricted content >here<
Historical Context
Repeatability Limit (stats)
(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)
Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles