Home » The “China Export” Mark Myth

The “China Export” Mark Myth

2008
Consumer awareness booth on CE marking and counterfeit marks in international trade.

A persistent urban myth suggests a “China Export” mark exists that is confusingly similar to the official CE marking, with closer letter spacing, to mislead consumers. After an individual member had wrongly reported this, the European Commission has investigated this and found no evidence of such a mark being systematically used. Any mark that can be confused with the official CE marking is considered an infringement, regardless of its claimed origin or meaning.

The ‘China Export’ myth gained traction in the mid-2000s, primarily through email chains and online forums, and . The claim was that some Chinese manufacturers were using a logo, where the C and E were very close together, to imply compliance with European standards while claiming it simply stood for ‘China Export’. This would theoretically provide a legal loophole if they were accused of fraudulent CE marking. The story was often accompanied by images comparing the two logos.

In response to a formal question in the European Parliament in 2008, the European Commission clarified its position. The Commission stated it was unaware of any ‘China Export’ mark and that the allegation was unfounded. It reiterated that under EU law, the only valid marking is the official ‘CE’ marking with its legally defined proportions. Any other mark that could be confused with it is illegal. The non-compliant marks seen on some products are simply incorrectly designed CE marks, whether due to ignorance or deliberate deception to create ambiguity. The Commission’s stance is that the motivation is irrelevant; a non-compliant mark is an infringement and subject to action by member state market surveillance authorities. This clarification was important to combat misinformation and reinforce that responsibility for correct marking lies with the manufacturer, and no such ‘loophole’ exists.

UNESCO Nomenclature: 5311
– International economics

Type

Abstract System

Disruption

Incremental

Usage

Widespread Use

Precursors

  • general issues with counterfeit goods and trademark infringement
  • consumer concerns about the safety of imported products
  • the rise of internet forums and email as vectors for misinformation

Applications

  • consumer awareness campaigns about genuine vs. counterfeit marks
  • increased scrutiny by market surveillance authorities on improperly marked goods
  • legal actions against manufacturers using misleading marks
  • clarification of ce marking rules by regulatory bodies

Patents:

NA

Potential Innovations Ideas

Professionals (100% free) Membership Required

You must be a Professionals (100% free) member to access this content.

Join Now

Already a member? Log in here
Related to: China Export, CE mark myth, counterfeit, misleading marking, European Commission, infringement, consumer protection, market surveillance, product fraud, misinformation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AVAILABLE FOR NEW CHALLENGES
Mechanical Engineer, Project, Process Engineering or R&D Manager
Effective product development

Available for a new challenge on short notice.
Contact me on LinkedIn
Plastic metal electronics integration, Design-to-cost, GMP, Ergonomics, Medium to high-volume devices & consumables, Lean Manufacturing, Regulated industries, CE & FDA, CAD, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, medical ISO 13485

We are looking for a new sponsor

 

Your company or institution is into technique, science or research ?
> send us a message <

Receive all new articles
Free, no spam, email not distributed nor resold

or you can get your full membership -for free- to access all restricted content >here<

Historical Context

(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)

Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles

Scroll to Top

You May Also Like