Product Design, Manufacturing & Innovation Resources
Home » Predatory Pricing

Predatory Pricing

1970
Corporate boardroom discussing predatory pricing strategies in micro-economics.

(generated image for illustration only)

A pricing strategy where a dominant firm sets prices for goods or services at an extremely low level, potentially below cost, to eliminate or discipline competitors. Once rivals are driven out of the market, the firm can raise prices to monopoly levels to recoup its losses. This practice is a method to create significant barriers to entry for new market participants.

Predatory pricing is a two-stage strategy. The first is the ‘predation’ or ‘sacrifice’ phase, where the dominant firm incurs short-term losses by selling its products below its own costs of production. The goal is to make it impossible for smaller or less financially stable competitors to remain profitable, forcing them to exit the market. The second stage is the ‘recoupment’ phase. After competition has been eliminated, the predator firm, now a monopolist or near-monopolist, raises prices significantly above the competitive level to recover the losses incurred during the predation phase and earn long-term monopoly profits.

Proving predatory pricing is notoriously difficult in legal settings because it requires distinguishing this harmful practice from legitimate, aggressive price competition, which benefits consumers. A key challenge is demonstrating the predator’s intent and its ability to recoup losses. To aid this, economists and legal scholars developed tests, most notably the Areeda-Turner test from 1975. This test proposes that prices set below a firm’s average variable cost should be presumed predatory. This provides a more objective, cost-based benchmark, though its application and validity are still debated. Courts often require evidence of both below-cost pricing and a dangerous probability of successful recoupment for a predatory pricing claim to succeed.

UNESCO Nomenclature: 5311
– Micro-economics

Type

Abstract System

Disruption

Incremental

Usage

Widespread Use

Precursors

  • theory of the firm
  • concepts of monopoly and perfect competition by Adam Smith and other classical economists
  • marginal cost theory
  • early antitrust legislation like the Sherman act of 1890

Applications

  • antitrust litigation (e.g., us vs. microsoft)
  • regulatory oversight by bodies like the ftc and european commission
  • economic consulting for market analysis
  • corporate strategy development for pricing policies
  • academic research in industrial organization

Patents:

NA

Potential Innovations Ideas

Due to scrapping bot traffic, currently more than 40k per day, this content is reserved to community members.
> Login < or > Register < (100% free) to access this, so as all other restricted content and tools.

Related to: predatory pricing, antitrust, competition law, monopoly, below-cost pricing, recoupment, barriers to entry, areeda-turner test, industrial organization, price discrimination.

Historical Context

Predatory Pricing

1957
1960
1965
1970
1980
1983
1990
1957
1960
1960
1970
1980
1980
1986
1990

(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)

Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles

Full size images and downloads are only available, 100% free, for registered members.

> Login <