Maison » Takt Time Implementation Challenges

Takt Time Implementation Challenges

1980

Successful Takt time implementation requires a highly stable production environment. Common challenges include managing machine downtime, ensuring consistent quality to avoid rework, and balancing lines that produce multiple products with different work contents (mixed-model lines). Without addressing these sources of variability, a Takt-driven system can be brittle and fail to meet demand consistently.

A system paced by Takt time has very little slack or buffer. This makes it highly efficient but also vulnerable to disruption. The first major challenge is reliability. If a machine breaks down, the entire line downstream of it starves for work, and the line cannot meet its Takt. This is why Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), a proactive approach to maintenance, is a crucial prerequisite for Takt time implementation.

The second challenge is quality. If a defective part is produced, it must be either scrapped or reworked. Both outcomes disrupt the flow. Rework, in particular, introduces unplanned work that consumes time and resources, making it impossible to adhere to the Takt rhythm. Therefore, robust in-process quality control methods, such as mistake-proofing (Poka-yoke) and the ability for any worker to stop the line (Andon), are essential.

Finally, product variety poses a significant challenge. If a line produces multiple products (a mixed-model line), and each product requires a different amount of work at each station, it becomes very difficult to balance the line. A simple Takt time calculation is insufficient. This requires more advanced techniques like creating a weighted-average Takt time and carefully sequencing the products (a practice known as Heijunka) to level the demand for work at each station over time.

UNESCO Nomenclature: 3308
– Industrial technology

Type

Abstract System

Disruption

Incremental

Utilisation

Widespread Use

Precursors

  • practical experiences with failures on early assembly lines
  • challenges in implementing mass production systems
  • development of quality control theories by W. Edwards Deming and Joseph Juran
  • early operations research on production scheduling and variability

Applications

  • total productive maintenance (TPM) programs to increase machine uptime
  • in-station quality control systems (jidoka, poka-yoke)
  • mixed-model line balancing techniques
  • cellular manufacturing design to isolate variability
  • heijunka (production leveling) to smooth demand

Brevets :

QUE

Potential Innovations Ideas

!niveaux !!! Adhésion obligatoire

Vous devez être membre de l'association pour accéder à ce contenu.

S’inscrire maintenant

Vous êtes déjà membre ? Connectez-vous ici
Related to: takt time, implementation, downtime, quality control, mixed-model line, line balancing, lean manufacturing, production stability

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

DISPONIBLE POUR DE NOUVEAUX DÉFIS
Ingénieur mécanique, chef de projet ou de R&D
Développement de produits efficace

Disponible pour un nouveau défi dans un court délai.
Contactez-moi sur LinkedIn
Intégration électronique métal-plastique, Conception à coût réduit, BPF, Ergonomie, Appareils et consommables de volume moyen à élevé, Secteurs réglementés, CE et FDA, CAO, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, ISO 13485 médical

Nous recherchons un nouveau sponsor

 

Votre entreprise ou institution est dans le domaine de la technique, de la science ou de la recherche ?
> envoyez-nous un message <

Recevez tous les nouveaux articles
Gratuit, pas de spam, email non distribué ni revendu

ou vous pouvez obtenir votre adhésion complète - gratuitement - pour accéder à tout le contenu restreint >ici<

Historical Context

(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)

Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles

Retour en haut

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi