Verification and validation (V&V) are distinct processes. Verification ensures a product meets its specified requirements (“Are you building it right?”). Validation ensures the product meets the user’s actual needs and intended use (“Are you building the right thing?”). They are complementary activities within quality management, often performed sequentially or in parallel to ensure both correctness and usefulness.
Verification vs. Validation
- Barry Boehm
The distinction between verifica E convalida is fundamental to quality assurance in any complex engineering discipline, particularly software and systems engineering. Verification is an internal quality process focused on compliance with specifications. It involves activities like reviews, inspections, and walkthroughs of design documents, code, and requirements. The goal is to find defects early in the development lifecycle. For example, a code review verifies that the software adheres to coding standards and correctly implements a specific algorithm as described in a design document.
Validation, on the other hand, is an external quality process focused on fitness for purpose. It assesses whether the final product is effective in the operational environment for which it was intended. This typically involves testing the product with actual users or in a simulated real-world environment. For instance, user acceptance testing (UAT) is a validation activity where end-users test the software to see if it helps them perform their tasks efficiently and effectively. A system can be perfectly verified—meaning it has no bugs and meets all documented specifications—but still fail validation if those specifications were flawed or did not accurately capture the user’s true needs.
Barry Boehm’s work emphasized that these two activities answer different questions and are crucial for delivering a successful product. Neglecting verification leads to a buggy, unreliable product, while neglecting validation leads to a product that, while technically sound, is ultimately useless to its intended audience. The two processes work in tandem to ensure both correctness and usefulness.
Tipo
Disruption
Utilizzo
Precursors
- early concepts of quality control in produzione
- formal logic and proof theory
- structured programming principles
- presto software testing methodologies
Applicazioni
- agile software development methodologies
- systems engineering lifecycle models (e.g., v-model)
- pharmaceutical drug development protocols
- aerospace systems certification (e.g., DO-178C)
- dispositivo medico approval processes (e.g., FDA regolamenti)
Brevetti:
Potential Innovations Ideas
Livelli! Iscrizione richiesta
Per accedere a questo contenuto devi essere un membro di !Professionals (100% free)!
DISPONIBILE PER NUOVE SFIDE
Ingegnere meccanico, responsabile di progetto o di ricerca e sviluppo
Disponibile per una nuova sfida con breve preavviso.
Contattami su LinkedIn
Integrazione di componenti elettronici in plastica e metallo, progettazione in base ai costi, GMP, ergonomia, dispositivi e materiali di consumo di medio-alto volume, settori regolamentati, CE e FDA, CAD, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, ISO 13485 in ambito medico
Stiamo cercando un nuovo sponsor
La tua azienda o istituzione si occupa di tecnica, scienza o ricerca?
> inviaci un messaggio <
Ricevi tutti i nuovi articoli
Gratuito, no spam, email non distribuita né rivenduta
oppure puoi ottenere la tua iscrizione completa -gratuitamente- per accedere a tutti i contenuti riservati >Qui<
Verification vs. Validation
(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)
Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles