Challenge Mapping

Challenge Mapping

Challenge Mapping

Objectif :

A brainstorming méthode that focuses on reframing a problem or challenge as an opportunity to generate more innovative solutions.

Comment il est utilisé :

Avantages

Inconvénients

Catégories :

Idéal pour :

Challenge Mapping proves valuable in various sectors such as product design, consumer electronics, and even community development, where the emphasis is on driving innovation through collaboration. During the initial phases of project development, diverse teams consisting of designers, engineers, and stakeholders convene to define a central challenge question like “How might we enhance user experience in our product?” This open-ended approach encourages participants from different backgrounds to contribute unique perspectives, enriching the brainstorming process with multifaceted ideas. Examples include tech companies utilizing Challenge Mapping to reimagine user interfaces by breaking down the broader challenge into specific inquiries about usability, accessibility, and engagement. In the healthcare sector, teams may use this methodology to explore innovative ways to improve patient care by dissecting the challenge into sub-questions concerning technology integration, patient feedback, and workflow efficiency. The collaborative nature of Challenge Mapping invites involvement from various sectors within an organization, promoting cross-functional teamwork. As teams brainstorm based on the refined sub-questions, they generate a wider array of potential solutions that can be prototyped and tested, thus accelerating the innovation process while ensuring solutions are rooted in user-centric design principles.

Principales étapes de cette méthodologie

  1. Define the central challenge question using the format 'How might we...?'.
  2. Identify key themes or areas related to the central challenge.
  3. Break down the central challenge into smaller, actionable sub-questions.
  4. Generate ideas corresponding to each sub-question through brainstorming sessions.
  5. Encourage diverse perspectives by inviting contributions from various stakeholders.
  6. Iterate on ideas by combining, refining, or reshaping them as necessary.
  7. Prioritize ideas based on feasibility, impact, and alignment with the challenge.
  8. Develop a prototype or outline for the most promising concepts.

Conseils de pro

  • Incorporate diverse stakeholder viewpoints early in the process; this can uncover hidden assumptions and broaden the range of possible solutions.
  • Create a visual framework for sub-questions using mind maps or flowcharts; this aids in clarifying relationships between challenges and enhances collaborative ideation.
  • Set specific criteria for evaluating sub-questions; this helps prioritize which ideas to pursue further, ensuring resources are allocated effectively.

Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le

> Référentiel méthodologique étendu  <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.

Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Articles Similaires

Retour en haut