A detailed analysis and comparison of competing products in the market.
- Methodologies: Engineering, Product Design, Project Management
Competitive Product Survey

Competitive Product Survey
- Competitive Analysis, Design Evaluation, Design for Manufacturing (DfM), Design Thinking, Product Development, Product Differentiation, User experience (UX), User Testing
Objective:
How it’s used:
- This involves acquiring and systematically examining competitor products to evaluate their features, design, quality, cost, and user experience, often involving teardowns or user testing.
Pros
- Provides direct insights into competitor product strategies, helps benchmark your own product's features and quality, and can reveal opportunities for differentiation.
Cons
- Can be expensive if it requires purchasing multiple competitor products, is a snapshot in time as products are constantly updated, and provides limited insight into the competitor's process or strategy.
Categories:
- Engineering, Product Design, Quality
Best for:
- Benchmarking and analyzing competitor products to inform the design and development of your own.
The Competitive Product Survey methodology is often applied during the early stages of product development or when assessing existing products for iterations and upgrades. Key players in this process typically include product managers, design teams, quality assurance specialists, and market analysts who collaborate to evaluate competitors’ offerings comprehensively. Various industries benefit from this approach, particularly technology, consumer electronics, automotive, and healthcare, where understanding market trends and customer preferences is imperative. For instance, in consumer electronics, teams may conduct teardowns of competing smartphones to analyze hardware configurations and materials, directly comparing them against their own products. User testing is another aspect that can provide valuable data on usability, where competitor products are put through similar user scenarios to gather consumer feedback. This methodology not only assists in identifying gaps in the market but also plays a crucial role in determining pricing strategies, feature sets, and marketing narratives that can lead to distinctive positioning. It serves as a framework for organizations to systematically document findings while keeping an eye on emerging trends and technologies that competitors leverage for market advantage, guiding teams towards more informed decision-making in their design and development practices.
Key steps of this methodology
- Select a range of competitor products for analysis.
- Conduct a thorough teardown to assess components and construction quality.
- Analyze product specifications and features in detail.
- Evaluate user experience through focus groups or usability tests.
- Measure performance metrics against your product's benchmarks.
- Identify unique selling points and differentiators of competitor products.
- Document observed strengths and weaknesses systematically.
- Identify trends in design and functionality across competitor offerings.
Pro Tips
- Utilize a mix of qualitative and quantitative metrics during user testing to capture both subjective experiences and objective performance data.
- Integrate contextual inquiries by observing users in natural settings while they interact with competitor products, revealing unarticulated needs and pain points.
- Conduct multi-dimensional teardowns that include not only physical disassembly but also an analysis of manufacturing processes and materials used for deeper insights into cost structures.
To read and compare several methodologies, we recommend the
> Extensive Methodologies Repository <
together with the 400+ other methodologies.
Your comments on this methodology or additional info are welcome on the comment section below ↓ , so as any engineering-related ideas or links.
Related Posts
Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Mass Customization
Marketing Funnel
Marketing Audit
MAPO Index (Movement and Assistance of Hospital Patients)
Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II)