グループミーティングにおける議論の補助メディアとして使用する。
| 加重MVP機能優先順位付けツール | ProductPlan | Aha! | Productboard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scoring method: Each feature gets an impact score and an effort score from 1 to 5. Scores combine by the Add method (with an adjustable weight ratio) or the Multiply method, and are shown on an impact versus effort matrix with four zones: Quick Wins, Major Projects, Fill-ins, Reconsider. | Scoring method: Offers prioritization boards inside a roadmapping platform. The scoring models are set up within the product. | Scoring method: Offers a scorecard to prioritize features, tied to roadmaps and idea management. | Scoring method: Includes custom prioritization formulas in the Business and Enterprise plans. The models available are defined in the platform. |
| 範囲: Designed for one task: ranking MVP features during a workshop. A simplified Pugh-matrix approach, with no roadmap or backlog. | 範囲: A roadmap and product intelligence platform, with idea capture and opportunity validation. | 範囲: A broader product management suite with roadmaps, ideas and whiteboards bundled in the Roadmaps plan. | 範囲: A full product management platform with feature hierarchy, dependency tracking and customizable statuses. |
| コストモデル: Free to use. Registration is free and gives access to downloads and full-size images. | コストモデル: One plan with no public price. Only builders are charged, viewers are free, and a demo is booked first. | コストモデル: Aha! Roadmaps is a paid per-seat subscription. A free trial is offered. | コストモデル: Business and Enterprise plans with no public price, a minimum of 5 makers, and annual billing listed as saving 21 percent. |
| Collaboration: Built for group meetings, with several people adding or updating features at the same time. | Collaboration: Multi-user, with seats for builders and unlimited viewers. | Collaboration: Multi-user, with per-user licences. | Collaboration: Multi-user, with makers and contributors (25 contributors included in Business). |
| いつ選択すべきか: Choose it for a fast, transparent discussion with a team when you do not need integration or long-term tracking. | いつ選択すべきか: Choose it when prioritization must feed a maintained roadmap shared across a company. | いつ選択すべきか: Choose it when scoring must connect to strategy, ideas and development tools such as Jira. | いつ選択すべきか: Choose it when many teams need structured feature hierarchies and custom formulas. |
取り上げるトピック: 加重MVP、機能優先順位付けツール、最小実行可能製品、基準の可視化、グループミーティング、ディスカッションサポート、優先順位付けツール、製品開発、ステークホルダーエンゲージメント、意思決定フレームワーク、アジャイル手法、ユーザーフィードバック、ISO 9241、ISO 25010、ISO 25012、ISO 9001、およびISO 31000。
フルサイズの画像とダウンロードは、登録会員のみが100%無料で利用できます。
> ログイン <