Downdetector | Innovation.world

Downdetector compared with StatusGator, IsItDownRightNow and UptimeRobot
ダウンディテクター	StatusGator	IsItDownRightNow	UptimeRobot
Signal source: The signal is made of outage reports submitted by users from per-service pages, shown as a time chart with a map of report origin. It shows user perception of a problem, not an automated measurement.	Signal source: It collects the official status pages of cloud and SaaS vendors and displays them in one dashboard. A change appears when the vendor reports downtime on its own status page.	Signal source: A third-party review states that it runs automated checks itself and does not use user reports. It sends HTTP or HTTPS requests and sometimes ICMP ping and reads the response code.	Signal source: It runs automated checks against the endpoints that you configure, so it measures your own services and not third-party platforms. Free monitor types include HTTP(S), port, ping, keyword, API, UDP, DNS and dependency checks.
カバレッジ： It reports on more than 12,000 services in 45 countries, each country having its own site, according to the Wikipedia article. Typical subjects are ISPs, platforms and consumer services.	カバレッジ： It tracks more than 4,000 cloud service providers and lets you follow individual components or regions as separate services. It can also monitor websites.	カバレッジ： It checks a single website address on demand. A review notes that it tests from limited locations, so regional outages can be missed.	カバレッジ： Coverage is limited to the monitors you create. The free plan allows up to 50 monitors with a 5-minute check interval, and paid plans shorten the interval.
Limits of the signal: A spike in reports does not always mean an outage, and small services can generate noise. For critical systems it should be compared with the provider status page.	Limits of the signal: It depends on what the vendor chooses to publish, so an incident not yet acknowledged by the vendor is not visible, although the product advertises early warning notifications.	Limits of the signal: It checks only whether the server responds. It cannot detect database problems, broken JavaScript, API failures or login issues, and free checks offer little history.	Limits of the signal: It sees only the paths and locations from which it probes, and its results are as good as the checks you define. The free plan keeps data for 3 months.
Alerts and automation: The page provides charts and user comments that often identify the failing component. No scripting interface is described in the sources checked.	Alerts and automation: Features include API access, webhooks, integrations such as PagerDuty, historical CSV export, public status pages and single sign-on.	Alerts and automation: The review describes a quick manual check and recommends confirming results with other tools. It does not describe alerting.	Alerts and automation: Alerts cover slow responses and SSL and domain expiry. Paid plans add webhook, Zapier and PagerDuty integrations and public status pages on your own domain.
	コストモデル： A free plan is available, and paid tiers add features.		コストモデル： A free plan is available, with paid plans offering faster checks, more status pages and longer data retention. Enterprise terms include an SLA and compliance support.

Downdetector compared with StatusGator, IsItDownRightNow and UptimeRobot

ダウンディテクター

StatusGator

IsItDownRightNow

UptimeRobot

Signal source: The signal is made of outage reports submitted by users from per-service pages, shown as a time chart with a map of report origin. It shows user perception of a problem, not an automated measurement.

Signal source: It collects the official status pages of cloud and SaaS vendors and displays them in one dashboard. A change appears when the vendor reports downtime on its own status page.

Signal source: A third-party review states that it runs automated checks itself and does not use user reports. It sends HTTP or HTTPS requests and sometimes ICMP ping and reads the response code.

Signal source: It runs automated checks against the endpoints that you configure, so it measures your own services and not third-party platforms. Free monitor types include HTTP(S), port, ping, keyword, API, UDP, DNS and dependency checks.

カバレッジ： It reports on more than 12,000 services in 45 countries, each country having its own site, according to the Wikipedia article. Typical subjects are ISPs, platforms and consumer services.

カバレッジ： It tracks more than 4,000 cloud service providers and lets you follow individual components or regions as separate services. It can also monitor websites.

カバレッジ： It checks a single website address on demand. A review notes that it tests from limited locations, so regional outages can be missed.

カバレッジ： Coverage is limited to the monitors you create. The free plan allows up to 50 monitors with a 5-minute check interval, and paid plans shorten the interval.

Limits of the signal: A spike in reports does not always mean an outage, and small services can generate noise. For critical systems it should be compared with the provider status page.

Limits of the signal: It depends on what the vendor chooses to publish, so an incident not yet acknowledged by the vendor is not visible, although the product advertises early warning notifications.

Limits of the signal: It checks only whether the server responds. It cannot detect database problems, broken JavaScript, API failures or login issues, and free checks offer little history.

Limits of the signal: It sees only the paths and locations from which it probes, and its results are as good as the checks you define. The free plan keeps data for 3 months.

Alerts and automation: The page provides charts and user comments that often identify the failing component. No scripting interface is described in the sources checked.

Alerts and automation: Features include API access, webhooks, integrations such as PagerDuty, historical CSV export, public status pages and single sign-on.

Alerts and automation: The review describes a quick manual check and recommends confirming results with other tools. It does not describe alerting.

Alerts and automation: Alerts cover slow responses and SSL and domain expiry. Paid plans add webhook, Zapier and PagerDuty integrations and public status pages on your own domain.

コストモデル： A free plan is available, and paid tiers add features.

コストモデル： A free plan is available, with paid plans offering faster checks, more status pages and longer data retention. Enterprise terms include an SLA and compliance support.