Casa » I migliori prompt di intelligenza artificiale per l'ingegneria meccanica

I migliori prompt di intelligenza artificiale per l'ingegneria meccanica

L'intelligenza artificiale stimola l'ingegneria meccanica
Ai ingegneria meccanica
Gli strumenti Ai-driven stanno rivoluzionando l'ingegneria meccanica migliorando l'ottimizzazione della progettazione, la velocità di simulazione, la manutenzione predittiva e la selezione dei materiali attraverso l'analisi avanzata dei dati e il riconoscimento dei modelli.

Gli strumenti di intelligenza artificiale online stanno rapidamente trasformando l'ingegneria meccanica aumentando le capacità umane di progettazione e analisi, produzionee manutenzione. Questi sistemi di intelligenza artificiale sono in grado di elaborare grandi quantità di dati, identificare modelli complessi e generare soluzioni innovative molto più rapidamente dei metodi tradizionali. Ad esempio, l'IA può aiutarvi a ottimizzare i progetti per le prestazioni e la producibilità, accelerare simulazioni complesse, prevedere le proprietà dei materiali e automatizzare un'ampia gamma di attività analitiche.

I suggerimenti forniti qui di seguito aiuteranno, ad esempio, a progettare in modo generativo, ad accelerare le simulazioni (FEA/CFD), ad aiutare nella manutenzione predittiva, dove l'intelligenza artificiale analizza i dati dei sensori dei macchinari per prevedere potenziali guasti, consentendo un'assistenza proattiva e riducendo al minimo i tempi di inattività, ad aiutare nella selezione dei materiali e molto altro ancora.

  • Per motivi di tempo e di risorse del server, le richieste sono riservate ai soli membri registrati e non sono visibili in basso se non si è registrati. È possibile registrarsi, 100% gratuitamente: 

È necessaria l'iscrizione

Per accedere a questo contenuto è necessario essere membri.

Visualizza i livelli d'iscrizione

Siete già membri? Accedi

Prompt AI per Comparative RCA for Repetitive Failures

Analyzes textual descriptions from multiple incident reports of a repetitive failure in a mechanical system. This prompt aims to identify common patterns potential shared root causes and any differentiating factors across incidents helping to solve persistent issues. The output is a markdown formatted comparative analysis.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Senior Reliability Engineer conducting a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) on REPETITIVE failures.
Your TASK is to analyze the information provided in `{multiple_failure_incident_reports_text}` concerning recurring instances of '`{common_failure_description}`' affecting the `{system_or_component_name}`.
The goal is to identify common patterns
 potential shared root causes
 and any significant differentiating factors or unique conditions across the incidents.
The `{multiple_failure_incident_reports_text}` is a single block of text where each incident report is clearly demarcated (e.g.
 by '---INCIDENT REPORT X START---' and '---INCIDENT REPORT X END---'
 or user ensures separation). Each report may contain details like date
 operator
 specific symptoms
 environmental conditions
 immediate actions taken
 and initial findings.

**COMPARATIVE ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS REPORT (MUST be Markdown format):**

**1. Overview of Repetitive Failure:**
    *   **System/Component**: `{system_or_component_name}`
    *   **Common Failure Mode**: `{common_failure_description}`
    *   **Number of Incident Reports Analyzed**: [AI to count based on demarcations in `{multiple_failure_incident_reports_text}`]

**2. Data Extraction and Tabulation (Conceptual - AI to perform this internally):**
    *   For each incident report
 extract key information such as:
        *   Incident ID/Date
        *   Specific symptoms observed (beyond the `{common_failure_description}`)
        *   Operating conditions at time of failure (load
 speed
 temperature
 etc.)
        *   Environmental conditions
        *   Maintenance history just prior
        *   Operator actions or comments
        *   Any parts replaced or immediate fixes tried.
    *   *(AI should internally process this information to find patterns. A table won't be in the final output unless it's a summary table
 but the AI's logic should be based on this kind of structured comparison.)*

**3. Identification of Common Patterns and Themes Across Incidents:**
    *   **Symptomology**: Are there consistent preceding symptoms or secondary effects noted across multiple reports before or during the `{common_failure_description}`?
    *   **Operating Conditions**: Do failures tend to occur under specific loads
 speeds
 temperatures
 or during particular phases of operation (startup
 shutdown
 steady-state)?
    *   **Environmental Factors**: Is there a correlation with specific environmental conditions (e.g.
 high humidity
 dusty environment
 specific time of day/year)?
    *   **Maintenance Activities**: Do failures cluster after certain maintenance activities
 or if maintenance is overdue?
    *   **Component Batch/Supplier (if mentioned in reports)**: Is there any indication of issues related to specific batches or suppliers of the `{system_or_component_name}` or its sub-parts?
    *   **Human Factors**: Any patterns related to operator experience
 shift changes
 or specific procedures being followed/not followed?

**4. Identification of Differentiating Factors and Unique Conditions:**
    *   Are there any incidents that stand out as different in terms
 of symptoms
 conditions
 or severity?
    *   What unique factors were present in these outlier incidents?
    *   Could these differences point to multiple root causes or aggravating factors for the `{common_failure_description}`?

**5. Hypothesis Generation for Potential Shared Root Cause(s):**
    Based on the common patterns
 propose 2-3 primary hypotheses for the underlying root cause(s) of the repetitive '`{common_failure_description}`'. For each hypothesis:
    *   **Hypothesis Statement**: (e.g.
 'Material fatigue due to cyclic loading under X condition'
 'Inadequate lubrication leading to premature wear'
 'Sensor malfunction providing incorrect feedback to control system').
    *   **Supporting Evidence from Reports**: Briefly list the common patterns from section 3 that support this hypothesis.

**6. Recommended Next Steps for Investigation / Verification:**
    *   What specific data collection
 tests
 or analyses should be performed to confirm or refute the proposed hypotheses? Examples:
        *   `Detailed metallurgical analysis of failed components from multiple incidents.`
        *   `Targeted inspection of [specific sub-component] across all similar units.`
        *   `Review of design specifications vs. actual operating conditions.`
        *   `Interviews with operators and maintenance staff involved in the incidents.`
        *   `Monitoring specific parameters (e.g.
 vibration
 temperature) that might be precursors.`

**7. Interim Containment or Mitigation Actions (if obvious from analysis):**
    *   Are there any immediate actions that could be taken to potentially reduce the frequency or severity of the failures while the full RCA is ongoing
 based on the patterns identified?

**IMPORTANT**: The analysis should focus on synthesizing information from MULTIPLE reports to find trends that might not be obvious from a single incident. The AI should clearly articulate the logic connecting observed patterns to potential root causes.
							

Prompt AI per Dual-Use Technology Ethical Assessment

Conducts a preliminary ethical assessment for a mechanical engineering technology that may have dual-use applications highlighting potential risks ethical dilemmas and proposing safeguards. This prompt aims to foster responsible innovation by considering unintended consequences. The output is a structured markdown report.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as an Ethics Reviewer specializing in dual-use technologies in engineering.
Your TASK is to conduct a preliminary ethical assessment of the `{technology_description_and_capabilities}`
 considering its `{intended_civilian_application}` and the `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}` (CSV string: 'Concern_ID
Description_of_Misuse
Potential_Harm_Level_High_Medium_Low').

**ETHICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT (MUST be Markdown format):**

**1. Technology Overview**
    *   Description of `{technology_description_and_capabilities}`.
    *   Stated `{intended_civilian_application}` and its potential benefits.

**2. Identification of Dual-Use Potential**
    *   Analysis of how the core capabilities of the technology could be diverted for harmful or unintended military/security purposes
 drawing from `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}`.
    *   For each concern in `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}`
 elaborate on the pathway from civilian application to potential misuse.

**3. Ethical Dilemmas and Concerns**
    *   **Responsibility of Innovators/Engineers**: Discuss the ethical obligations of those developing such technologies.
    *   **Risk of Unintended Escalation**: How could the technology contribute to instability or an arms race if misused?
    *   **Accessibility and Proliferation**: How easily could the technology or knowledge to replicate it spread to actors with malicious intent?
    *   **Difficulty in Control/Verification**: Once developed
 how hard is it to monitor or control its use or prevent its misuse?
    *   **Impact on Human Rights**: Potential for the technology to be used in ways that violate human rights (e.g.
 surveillance
 autonomous weapons if applicable).

**4. Assessment of Potential Harms (based on `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}`)**
    *   Summarize the potential severity and nature of harms associated with the identified misuses.

**5. Proposed Safeguards and Mitigation Strategies**
    *   **Technical Safeguards**: Are there ways to design the technology to make misuse more difficult (e.g.
 built-in limitations
 usage restrictions
 tamper-proofing
 tracking mechanisms)?
    *   **Policy and Regulatory Safeguards**: Suggestions for governance frameworks
 export controls
 international treaties
 or ethical oversight bodies that could mitigate risks.
    *   **Transparency and Open Dialogue**: Importance of public discussion and engagement with policymakers and ethicists throughout the technology's lifecycle.
    *   **End-User Vetting and Agreements**: Potential for controlling distribution to responsible parties.

**6. Conclusion and Recommendation**
    *   Summarize the key ethical risks associated with the dual-use potential of `{technology_description_and_capabilities}`.
    *   Provide a concluding thought on whether development should proceed
 and if so
 under what ethical conditions or with what mandatory safeguards.
    *   Suggest if a more comprehensive ethical review by a dedicated committee is warranted.

**IMPORTANT**: This is a PRELIMINARY assessment. The aim is to raise awareness and stimulate deeper ethical reflection
 not to provide a definitive judgment. Focus on balancing innovation with responsibility.
							

Prompt AI per Experimental Plan Critique and Improvement Suggestions

This prompt asks the AI to analyze a provided experimental design in mechanical engineering, identifying weaknesses and proposing detailed improvements to enhance validity, reliability, and efficiency. The user inputs the experimental plan description and key variables.

Uscita: 

				
					Critically analyze the following mechanical engineering experimental plan: {experimental_plan}. Consider the key variables: {key_variables}. Identify potential flaws or limitations in design, controls, sample size, measurement methods, and data collection. Suggest specific improvements or alternative approaches to increase validity, reliability, and efficiency. Present your analysis in a numbered list with clear rationale for each suggestion.
							

Prompt AI per Grant Proposal Significance Section Draft

Drafts the Significance and Innovation sections for a mechanical engineering grant proposal highlighting the project’s novelty research gap addressed and potential impact. This prompt helps engineers articulate the core value of their proposed work. The output is a markdown formatted text.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Scientific Writing Assistant specializing in engineering grant proposals.
Your TASK is to draft the 'Significance' and 'Innovation' sections (or a combined 'Significance and Innovation' section) for a grant proposal titled '`{project_title}`'.
The draft should clearly articulate the importance of the `{research_problem_statement}`
 the novelty of the `{proposed_solution_summary}`
 and the potential impact of the research
 drawing upon the `{key_innovative_aspects_list_csv}` (CSV string: 'Aspect_ID
Description_of_Innovation').

**DRAFT SECTIONS (MUST be Markdown format):**

**`{project_title}`**

**Significance**

1.  **Critical Need/Problem Statement**:
    *   Elaborate on the `{research_problem_statement}`. Clearly define the existing challenge
 knowledge gap
 or unmet need in the field of mechanical engineering that this project addresses.
    *   Explain the current limitations or drawbacks of existing approaches or technologies.
    *   Quantify the problem if possible (e.g.
 'Current methods result in X% energy loss'
 'Failures due to Y cost the industry $Z annually').
2.  **Impact if Successful**:
    *   Describe the potential impact of successfully completing this project. How will the `{proposed_solution_summary}` advance scientific knowledge
 technological capability
 or address societal needs?
    *   Who will benefit from this research (e.g.
 specific industries
 researchers
 society at large)?
    *   Discuss broader impacts
 such as contributions to education
 diversity
 or economic development
 if applicable.
3.  **Relevance to Funder's Mission (Generic - user to tailor if funder is known)**:
    *   Briefly connect the project's goals to typical missions of funding agencies focused on scientific and technological advancement (e.g.
 advancing fundamental knowledge
 fostering innovation
 enhancing national competitiveness
 solving critical societal problems).

**Innovation**

1.  **Novelty of Approach/Concept**:
    *   Clearly explain what is fundamentally new and innovative about the `{proposed_solution_summary}` and the project's overall approach.
    *   Refer to specific points from `{key_innovative_aspects_list_csv}`. For each innovative aspect:
        *   Describe the innovation in detail.
        *   Explain how it departs from or improves upon current paradigms
 theories
 methods
 or technologies.
2.  **Advancement Beyond Current State-of-the-Art**:
    *   Contrast the proposed work with existing methods
 highlighting the advancements it offers.
    *   Why is this approach likely to be more effective
 efficient
 or transformative than current alternatives?
3.  **Potential for Paradigm Shift (if applicable)**:
    *   If the project has the potential to significantly change the way research is conducted or problems are solved in this field
 articulate this potential.

**Overall Summary of Significance and Innovation**:
    *   A brief concluding paragraph that powerfully reiterates why this project is important
 innovative
 and worthy of funding.

**IMPORTANT**: The tone should be persuasive
 confident
 and scholarly. Ensure clear connections between the problem
 the proposed innovative solution
 and the expected impact. Avoid jargon where possible or explain it.
							

Prompt AI per Optimal Experimental Design Generator

This prompt instructs the AI to design an optimal experiment to investigate specified mechanical engineering parameters. The user provides the research question, variables to test, and constraints. The AI returns a full experimental plan with control groups, sample sizes, and measurement strategies.

Uscita: 

				
					Design an optimal experimental plan for the mechanical engineering research question: {research_question}. The variables to be tested are: {variables}. Consider the following constraints: {constraints}. Provide a detailed plan including experimental setup, control groups, number of samples, measurement techniques, data collection methods, and statistical analysis approach. Format your response using markdown with sections and bullet points. Emphasize efficiency and validity in your design.
							

Prompt AI per Technical Report Abstract Generator

Generates a concise and informative abstract for a technical report based on key sections of the report. This prompt helps engineers quickly summarize their work for wider dissemination. The output is a plain text abstract.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Technical Editor specializing in engineering reports.
Your TASK is to generate a concise and informative abstract for a technical report titled '`{report_title}`'.
The abstract should be based on the following summaries provided by the user:
    *   `{project_objectives_summary}`: A brief statement of the project's goals.
    *   `{methodology_used_summary}`: A concise description of the methods
 tools
 or approaches employed.
    *   `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`: A summary of the most important findings and the main conclusions drawn from the project.

**ABSTRACT GENERATION GUIDELINES:**

The abstract MUST be a single paragraph
 typically between 150-250 words (though this is a guideline
 quality over strict length).
It should be structured to include the following elements seamlessly:

1.  **Background/Purpose (derived from `{project_objectives_summary}` and `{report_title}`):**
    *   Start with a sentence or two that introduces the context or purpose of the work described in '`{report_title}`' and its main objectives from `{project_objectives_summary}`.
2.  **Methodology (derived from `{methodology_used_summary}`):**
    *   Briefly describe the key methods
 experimental procedures
 simulation techniques
 or analytical approaches used
 as outlined in `{methodology_used_summary}`. Avoid excessive detail; focus on what was done.
3.  **Key Results (derived from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`):**
    *   Highlight the most significant findings or outcomes of the project. Quantify results where possible and impactful (e.g.
 'a 25% improvement in efficiency was observed'
 'the material exhibited a tensile strength of X MPa').
4.  **Main Conclusions (derived from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`):**
    *   State the primary conclusions drawn from the results. What is the overall significance of the findings?
5.  **Keywords (Optional but Recommended - AI to suggest 3-5 based on content):**
    *   If appropriate
 the AI can suggest a few keywords at the end of the abstract text
 prefixed with 'Keywords:'. This is a secondary task.

**Output Format:**
Plain text
 suitable for direct inclusion in a technical report.

**Example Abstract Structure (Conceptual):**
`This report
 '`{report_title}`'
 details an investigation aimed at [paraphrase/combine from `{project_objectives_summary}`]. The study employed [summarize from `{methodology_used_summary}`
 e.g.
 'a combination of finite element analysis and experimental validation' or 'a novel design algorithm']. Key findings indicate [summarize key quantitative or qualitative results from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`]. It was concluded that [summarize main conclusions from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`
 highlighting significance].`
`Keywords: [Suggested Keyword1
 Suggested Keyword2
 Suggested Keyword3]`

**IMPORTANT**: The abstract MUST be self-contained and understandable without reference to the full report. It should be accurate
 concise
 and highlight the most compelling aspects of the work. Avoid using jargon that isn't commonly understood or defined within the abstract's context.
							

Prompt AI per Statistical Power Analysis for Experiments

This prompt requests the AI to perform a statistical power analysis for a mechanical engineering experiment based on input parameters such as effect size, sample size, and significance level. It helps determine if the experiment is sufficiently powered.

Uscita: 

				
					Perform a statistical power analysis for a mechanical engineering experiment with the following parameters: Effect Size: {effect_size}, Sample Size: {sample_size}, Significance Level (alpha): {significance_level}. Calculate the statistical power and interpret whether the current design is adequate. If underpowered, suggest adjustments to sample size or effect size. Present calculations step-by-step and summarize the conclusion clearly.
							

Prompt AI per Critica della metodologia del documento di ricerca

Esamina e suggerisce miglioramenti per la sezione metodologica di un documento di ricerca di ingegneria meccanica, concentrandosi sulla chiarezza, la completezza, la giustificazione e l'adeguatezza dei metodi utilizzati. Questa richiesta contribuisce a migliorare il rigore e la riproducibilità della ricerca. Il risultato è una critica in formato markdown.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Peer Reviewer for a Mechanical Engineering journal.
Your TASK is to critique the provided `{current_methodology_section_text}` from a research paper
 keeping in mind the stated `{research_objectives_text}` and the `{key_equipment_or_software_used_list_csv}` (CSV: 'Item_Name
Model_Specification
Manufacturer').
The critique should focus on improving clarity
 completeness
 justification
 and appropriateness of the described methodology.

**CRITIQUE AND RECOMMENDATIONS (MUST be Markdown format):**

**Critique of Methodology Section for Research Objectives: '`{research_objectives_text}`'**

**1. Overall Clarity and Structure:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Evaluate the overall readability
 logical flow
 and organization of the `{current_methodology_section_text}`. Is it easy to follow? Are steps presented in a logical sequence?]
    *   **Recommendations**: [Suggest improvements to structure
 e.g.
 'Consider using subheadings for distinct phases of the methodology like Experimental Setup
 Data Collection
 and Data Analysis.' or 'Clarify the transition between step X and step Y.']

**2. Completeness of Description:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Are all necessary details provided for another researcher to replicate the study? Consider aspects like:]
        *   Sample preparation (if applicable).
        *   Detailed parameters for `{key_equipment_or_software_used_list_csv}`.
        *   Environmental conditions.
        *   Duration
 frequency
 or number of measurements/simulations.
        *   Specific protocols or standards followed (and if they are cited).
    *   **Recommendations**: [Point out specific missing information
 e.g.
 'Specify the sampling rate used for data acquisition with [Sensor Name].' or 'Provide details on the mesh convergence study for the FEA model using [Software Name].' or 'Describe the calibration procedure for [Instrument Name].']

**3. Justification and Appropriateness of Methods:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Are the chosen methods
 materials
 and equipment appropriate for achieving the `{research_objectives_text}`? Is the choice of methods justified
 either explicitly or implicitly through common practice? Are any limitations of the chosen methods acknowledged?]
    *   **Recommendations**: [Suggest areas where justification is weak or missing
 e.g.
 'Explain why [Specific Method A] was chosen over [Alternative Method B] for addressing [Specific Objective].' or 'Discuss the potential impact of using [Material Grade X] if its properties significantly differ from those assumed in the model.']

**4. Data Analysis and Statistical Treatment (if described):**
    *   **Assessment**: [If data analysis or statistical methods are mentioned
 are they appropriate and clearly described? Are error analysis or uncertainty quantification addressed?]
    *   **Recommendations**: [e.g.
 'Specify the statistical tests used to compare groups.' or 'Clarify how outliers were handled in the dataset.']

**5. Reproducibility:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Overall
 does the section provide enough information to ensure that the work is reproducible?]
    *   **General Recommendations**: [Summarize key actions to enhance reproducibility.]

**Specific Comments/Queries (line numbers or specific phrases can be referenced if the AI were to see the original text with them):**
    *   [e.g.
 'Regarding the statement "...optimized parameters were used..."
 please specify how these parameters were optimized and what the final values were.']
    *   [e.g.
 'The description of [Equipment X from `{key_equipment_or_software_used_list_csv}`] lacks details on its accuracy/resolution
 which could be important.']

**IMPORTANT**: The critique should be constructive
 specific
 and aimed at helping the author improve the methodology section. Refer to the `{research_objectives_text}` to ensure alignment.
							

Prompt AI per Creatore della lista di controllo per la convalida dei dati sperimentali

Questa richiesta chiede all'IA di generare una lista di controllo dettagliata per la convalida della qualità e dell'integrità dei dati sperimentali di ingegneria meccanica, in base alla descrizione dell'esperimento e al tipo di dati forniti dall'utente.

Uscita: 

				
					Create a comprehensive checklist for validating the quality and integrity of experimental data in mechanical engineering. The experiment description is: {experiment_description}. The type of data collected is: {data_type}. The checklist should cover data collection methods, calibration, error sources, data consistency, and documentation practices. Format the checklist in markdown with numbered items and subpoints. Highlight critical validation steps.
							

Prompt AI per Struttura della revisione della letteratura per l'introduzione

Aiuta a strutturare la revisione della letteratura per la sezione introduttiva di un documento di ricerca, identificando i temi chiave dagli abstract forniti e suggerendo un flusso logico per stabilire le lacune della ricerca per un argomento di ingegneria meccanica. L'output è costituito da uno schema in markdown e da una guida narrativa.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Research Methodology Advisor specializing in scientific writing for Mechanical Engineering.
Your TASK is to help structure the literature review part of an introduction section for a research paper on '`{research_topic_title}`'.
You will be given a `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}` (a block of text containing several abstracts or summaries of key papers) and the `{main_research_gap_or_question}` the author intends to address.
Your goal is to propose a logical flow and thematic organization for the literature review that effectively leads to the stated research gap/question.

**PROPOSED LITERATURE REVIEW STRUCTURE (MUST be Markdown format):**

**Research Topic**: `{research_topic_title}`
**Stated Research Gap/Question**: `{main_research_gap_or_question}`

**I. Broad Context and Motivation (1-2 paragraphs)**
    *   **Guidance**: Start by establishing the general importance and relevance of the broader field related to `{research_topic_title}`.
    *   **Content to draw from `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}`**: Identify abstracts that provide this wider context or highlight the significance of the area.
    *   **Example Phrasing**: "The field of [Broader Field of `{research_topic_title}`] has garnered significant attention due to its implications for..."

**II. Key Themes/Sub-areas from Existing Literature (organized thematically
 3-5 paragraphs typically)**
    *   **Guidance**: Analyze the `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}` to identify recurring themes
 established findings
 common methodologies
 or different approaches related to `{research_topic_title}`. Group papers by these themes.
    *   **For each Theme/Sub-area X**: 
        *   **A. Introduce Theme X**: Briefly state what this theme covers.
        *   **B. Summarize Key Contributions**: Discuss what important studies (from the provided list) have found regarding Theme X. Mention specific authors or papers if they are seminal (e.g.
 "Smith et al. (Year) demonstrated...
 while Jones (Year) focused on...").
        *   **C. Highlight Consistencies or Contradictions**: Note if findings are generally in agreement or if there are conflicting results or debates within this theme.
    *   **Example Themes (AI to derive from abstracts)**: Based on typical mechanical engineering topics
 themes could be "Material Development for [Application]"
 "Advancements in [Specific Manufacturing Process]"
 "Computational Modeling of [Phenomenon]"
 "Experimental Validation of [Theory/Model]"
 "Limitations of Current [Technology/Approach]".

**III. Identification of a Specific Gap or Unresolved Issues (1-2 paragraphs)**
    *   **Guidance**: Transition from the summary of existing work to pinpointing specific limitations
 unanswered questions
 or underexplored areas that emerge from the reviewed literature. This section directly sets the stage for the `{main_research_gap_or_question}`.
    *   **Content to draw from `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}`**: Look for phrases in abstracts like "further research is needed..."
 "limitations of this study include..."
 or areas where fewer studies exist.
    *   **Example Phasing**: "Despite these advancements
 several aspects remain underexplored..." or "A critical review of the literature reveals a gap in understanding..."

**IV. Statement of Current Work and How It Addresses the Gap (1 paragraph)**
    *   **Guidance**: Clearly state the `{main_research_gap_or_question}` that YOUR proposed paper will address.
    *   Briefly outline how your paper aims to fill this gap or answer this question
 linking it to the shortcomings identified in section III.
    *   **Example Phasing**: "Therefore
 the present study aims to address this gap by investigating [your specific objective related to `{main_research_gap_or_question}`] through [your brief method]..."

**Logical Flow Summary**:
    *   `General Importance -> Specific Area Review (Thematic) -> Limitations/Gaps in Specific Area -> How Current Paper Fills a Specific Gap.`

**IMPORTANT**: The AI should analyze the provided `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}` to suggest plausible themes. The structure should provide a compelling narrative that justifies the need for the research addressing the `{main_research_gap_or_question}`.
							
Sommario
    Aggiungi un'intestazione per iniziare a generare il sommario

    SFIDA DI DESIGN o DI PROGETTO?
    Ingegnere meccanico, responsabile di progetto o di ricerca e sviluppo
    Sviluppo efficace del prodotto

    Disponibile per una nuova sfida con breve preavviso in Francia e Svizzera.
    Contattami su LinkedIn
    Prodotti in plastica e metallo, Design-to-cost, Ergonomia, Volume medio-alto, Settori regolamentati, CE e FDA, CAD, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, ISO 13485 Classe II e III

    Stiamo cercando un nuovo sponsor

     

    La tua azienda o istituzione si occupa di tecnica, scienza o ricerca?
    > inviaci un messaggio <

    Ricevi tutti i nuovi articoli
    Gratuito, no spam, email non distribuita né rivenduta

    oppure puoi ottenere la tua iscrizione completa -gratuitamente- per accedere a tutti i contenuti riservati >Qui<

    Argomenti trattati: test, convalida, input dell'utente, raccolta dati, meccanismo di feedback, test interattivi, progettazione di indagini, test di usabilità, valutazione del software, progettazione sperimentale, valutazione delle prestazioni, questionario, ISO 9241, ISO 25010, ISO 20282, ISO 13407 e ISO 26362.

    1. Wynter

      Stiamo dando per scontato che l'IA possa sempre generare i migliori prompt in ingegneria meccanica? Come vengono generati?

    2. Giselle

      L'intelligenza artificiale renderà superflui gli ingegneri umani?

    Lascia un commento

    Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

    Post correlati

    Torna in alto

    Potrebbe anche piacerti