Casa » I migliori prompt di intelligenza artificiale per l'ingegneria meccanica

I migliori prompt di intelligenza artificiale per l'ingegneria meccanica

L'intelligenza artificiale stimola l'ingegneria meccanica
Ai ingegneria meccanica
Gli strumenti Ai-driven stanno rivoluzionando l'ingegneria meccanica migliorando l'ottimizzazione della progettazione, la velocità di simulazione, la manutenzione predittiva e la selezione dei materiali attraverso l'analisi avanzata dei dati e il riconoscimento dei modelli.

Gli strumenti di intelligenza artificiale online stanno rapidamente trasformando l'ingegneria meccanica aumentando le capacità umane di progettazione e analisi, produzionee manutenzione. Questi sistemi di intelligenza artificiale sono in grado di elaborare grandi quantità di dati, identificare modelli complessi e generare soluzioni innovative molto più rapidamente dei metodi tradizionali. Ad esempio, l'IA può aiutarvi a ottimizzare i progetti per le prestazioni e la producibilità, accelerare simulazioni complesse, prevedere le proprietà dei materiali e automatizzare un'ampia gamma di attività analitiche.

I suggerimenti forniti qui di seguito aiuteranno, ad esempio, a progettare in modo generativo, ad accelerare le simulazioni (FEA/CFD), ad aiutare nella manutenzione predittiva, dove l'intelligenza artificiale analizza i dati dei sensori dei macchinari per prevedere potenziali guasti, consentendo un'assistenza proattiva e riducendo al minimo i tempi di fermo, a selezionare i materiali e molto altro ancora.

  • Per motivi di tempo e di risorse del server, le richieste sono riservate ai soli membri registrati e non sono visibili in basso se non si è registrati. È possibile registrarsi, 100% gratuitamente: 

È necessaria l'iscrizione

Per accedere a questo contenuto è necessario essere membri.

Visualizza i livelli d'iscrizione

Siete già membri? Accedi

Prompt AI per Analisi dell'albero dei guasti Impostazione dell'evento top

Aiuta ad avviare un'analisi dell'albero dei guasti (FTA) definendo l'evento indesiderato principale e suggerendo i guasti dei sottosistemi o gli eventi di base che vi contribuiscono immediatamente per un sistema meccanico descritto. Questo prompt fornisce un punto di partenza per una dettagliata valutazione quantitativa o qualitativa del rischio. L'output è una struttura ad albero in formato markdown.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a System Safety Engineer specializing in Fault Tree Analysis (FTA).
Your TASK is to help set up the initial levels of a Fault Tree for the `{system_description_text}`.
The TOP EVENT (the main undesired failure) is: `{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`.
Consider the `{key_subsystems_or_components_list_csv}` (CSV: 'Subsystem_Or_Component_Name
Brief_Function') as potential contributors.
You should propose immediate contributing events (intermediate events or basic events) and the logical gates (AND
 OR) that connect them to the Top Event or to each other at the first couple of levels.

**FAULT TREE ANALYSIS - INITIAL STRUCTURE (MUST be Markdown format):**

**System Under Analysis**: `{system_description_text}`
**Top Undesired Event**: `{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`

**Level 0: Top Event**
```mermaid
graph TD
    TE(`{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`")
```

**Level 1: Immediate Contributing Events / Sub-System Failures**
    *   **Guidance**: Think about the major ways the Top Event could occur. These could be failures of major subsystems listed in `{key_subsystems_or_components_list_csv}` or general failure categories. Determine if these immediate causes need to ALL occur (AND gate) or if ANY ONE of them occurring is sufficient (OR gate) to cause the Top Event.

    **Proposed Structure (Example - AI to generate based on inputs):**
    *   *If the Top Event can be caused by failure of Subsystem A OR Subsystem B OR an External Event:*
    ```mermaid
    graph TD
        TE("`{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`") -->|OR Gate G1| IE1("Failure of [Subsystem A Name from CSV]")
        TE -->|OR Gate G1| IE2("Failure of [Subsystem B Name from CSV]")
        TE -->|OR Gate G1| IE3("Relevant External Event Causing Failure
 e.g.
 Power Loss")
    ```
    *   *If the Top Event occurs only if Component X AND Component Y fail simultaneously:*
    ```mermaid
    graph TD
        TE("`{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`") -->|AND Gate G2| BE1("Failure of [Component X Name from CSV]")
        TE -->|AND Gate G2| BE2("Failure of [Component Y Name from CSV]")
    ```

**Level 2: Further Breakdown of Level 1 Intermediate Events (Illustrative for one branch)**
    *   **Guidance**: Take ONE of the Intermediate Events (IE) from Level 1 and break it down further. Identify how that specific subsystem or intermediate event could fail.
    *   **Example (Continuing from OR Gate G1
 focusing on IE1 'Failure of Subsystem A'):**
        *   *If 'Failure of Subsystem A' can be caused by 'Component A1 Failure' OR 'Component A2 Failure':*
        ```mermaid
        graph TD
            TE("`{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`") -->|OR Gate G1| IE1("Failure of [Subsystem A Name]")
            TE -->|OR Gate G1| IE2("Failure of [Subsystem B Name]")
            TE -->|OR Gate G1| IE3("External Event")
            IE1 -->|OR Gate G1A| BE_A1("Failure of [Component A1 of Subsystem A]")
            IE1 -->|OR Gate G1A| BE_A2("Failure of [Component A2 of Subsystem A]")
        ```
        *   The events BE_A1
 BE_A2 would be ""Basic Events"" if they represent the limit of resolution (e.g.
 a specific part failing
 human error
 software glitch) for this initial setup
 or they could be further developed Intermediate Events.

**Key Considerations for Further Development by User:**
    *   **Basic Events**: These are typically failures of individual components
 human errors
 or external events that require no further decomposition. Their probabilities of occurrence are often estimated from historical data
 handbook data
 or expert judgment.
    *   **Gate Logic**: Carefully determine if contributing events need an AND gate (all must occur) or an OR gate (any one can cause the higher-level event).
    *   **Mutual Exclusivity**: Assume events are independent unless otherwise specified.
    *   **Data Requirements**: For a quantitative FTA
 failure probabilities for all basic events are needed.
    *   **Common Cause Failures**: Consider if a single event could cause multiple basic events to fail simultaneously (this adds complexity beyond this initial setup but is important for full FTA).

**AI's Proposed Initial Breakdown (specific to your inputs):**
    *(The AI should now provide a concrete proposed Mermaid diagram snippet for Level 0 and Level 1
 and one branch of Level 2
 based on the user's specific `{system_description_text}`
 `{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`
 and `{key_subsystems_or_components_list_csv}`. It should make reasonable assumptions about how these subsystems might contribute to the top event
 stating the gate logic clearly.)*
    ```mermaid
    graph TD
        TE("`{undesired_top_event_failure_description}`")
        // AI will populate the connections and Level 1 / Level 2 events here
        // Example: If key_subsystems_or_components_list_csv includes 'Hydraulic_Pump
Provides_Pressure' and 'Control_Valve
Directs_Flow'
        // and top event is 'System_Fails_to_Actuate'
        // TE -->|OR Gate G_Main| Pump_Failure("Hydraulic Pump Fails")
        // TE -->|OR Gate G_Main| Valve_Failure("Control Valve Fails")
        // TE -->|OR Gate G_Main| Electrical_Failure("Control System Electrical Failure")
        // Pump_Failure -->|OR Gate G_Pump| Motor_Fails("Pump Motor Fails (Basic Event)")
        // Pump_Failure -->|OR Gate G_Pump| Pump_Internal_Leak("Pump Internal Leakage (Basic Event)")
    ```

**IMPORTANT**: This prompt generates a STARTING POINT for an FTA. A complete FTA is a detailed and iterative process. The Mermaid syntax is provided to suggest a visual structure; the user would use FTA software or draw this out. The AI's main role here is to structure the initial decomposition logically."
							

Prompt AI per Societal Impact Analysis of Automation

Analyzes the potential societal impacts such as employment shifts skill demand changes and accessibility issues arising from implementing a specific automation technology in a mechanical engineering sector. This prompt helps engineers consider broader societal consequences. The output is a text-based report.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Socio-Technical Analyst specializing in the impacts of automation in engineering fields.
Your TASK is to provide an analysis of the potential societal impacts of implementing `{automation_technology_description}` within the `{industry_sector_of_application}` specifically considering the `{geographical_region_context}`.
You SHOULD use live internet access to gather data on employment trends
 skill demands
 and relevant socio-economic studies for the specified region and sector.

**SOCIETAL IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT (Plain Text Format):**

**1. Introduction**
    *   Overview of the `{automation_technology_description}` and its intended application in the `{industry_sector_of_application}`.
    *   Brief note on the socio-economic context of `{geographical_region_context}` relevant to automation.

**2. Potential Impacts on Employment**
    *   **Job Displacement**: Analyze potential for job losses in roles directly affected by the automation. Provide any available statistics or projections for the `{industry_sector_of_application}` in `{geographical_region_context}`.
    *   **Job Creation**: Analyze potential for new jobs created (e.g.
 maintenance of automated systems
 programming
 data analysis
 new roles enabled by the technology).
    *   **Job Transformation**: How existing roles might change
 requiring new skills or responsibilities.

**3. Shifts in Skill Demand**
    *   **Upskilling/Reskilling Needs**: Identify skills that will become more critical (e.g.
 digital literacy
 robotics programming
 data interpretation
 complex problem-solving) and skills that may become obsolete.
    *   **Impact on Training and Education**: Discuss potential needs for changes in vocational training and engineering curricula in `{geographical_region_context}`.

**4. Economic Impacts**
    *   **Productivity Gains**: Potential for increased efficiency
 output
 and competitiveness in the `{industry_sector_of_application}`.
    *   **Investment Requirements**: Capital costs associated with implementing `{automation_technology_description}`.
    *   **Distribution of Economic Benefits**: Discuss who is likely to benefit most (e.g.
 capital owners
 highly skilled labor
 consumers). Consider potential for increased inequality.

**5. Accessibility and Equity**
    *   **Impact on Small vs. Large Businesses**: Can businesses of all sizes in `{geographical_region_context}` adopt this technology
 or does it favor larger enterprises?
    *   **Impact on Different Demographics**: Are there specific groups (e.g.
 older workers
 specific genders
 minority groups) that might be disproportionately affected
 positively or negatively?
    *   **Digital Divide**: Does the technology exacerbate or mitigate the digital divide within the region?

**6. Broader Societal and Ethical Considerations**
    *   **Worker Well-being**: Impact on job quality
 stress levels
 and workplace safety.
    *   **Social Acceptance and Resistance**: Potential for resistance to adoption from workers or the public.
    *   **Long-term Regional Development**: How might widespread adoption of this technology influence the economic trajectory of `{geographical_region_context}`?

**7. Policy Recommendations / Mitigation Strategies (Brief Suggestions)**
    *   Proactive measures that could be taken by policymakers
 industry
 or educational institutions in `{geographical_region_context}` to maximize benefits and mitigate negative impacts (e.g.
 retraining programs
 social safety nets
 investment in education).

**8. Conclusion**
    *   Summary of key potential societal impacts and a call for responsible implementation.

**Disclaimer**: This analysis is based on publicly available information and general trends. Specific impacts can vary based on the details of implementation.
							

Prompt AI per Dual-Use Technology Ethical Assessment

Conducts a preliminary ethical assessment for a mechanical engineering technology that may have dual-use applications highlighting potential risks ethical dilemmas and proposing safeguards. This prompt aims to foster responsible innovation by considering unintended consequences. The output is a structured markdown report.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as an Ethics Reviewer specializing in dual-use technologies in engineering.
Your TASK is to conduct a preliminary ethical assessment of the `{technology_description_and_capabilities}`
 considering its `{intended_civilian_application}` and the `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}` (CSV string: 'Concern_ID
Description_of_Misuse
Potential_Harm_Level_High_Medium_Low').

**ETHICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT (MUST be Markdown format):**

**1. Technology Overview**
    *   Description of `{technology_description_and_capabilities}`.
    *   Stated `{intended_civilian_application}` and its potential benefits.

**2. Identification of Dual-Use Potential**
    *   Analysis of how the core capabilities of the technology could be diverted for harmful or unintended military/security purposes
 drawing from `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}`.
    *   For each concern in `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}`
 elaborate on the pathway from civilian application to potential misuse.

**3. Ethical Dilemmas and Concerns**
    *   **Responsibility of Innovators/Engineers**: Discuss the ethical obligations of those developing such technologies.
    *   **Risk of Unintended Escalation**: How could the technology contribute to instability or an arms race if misused?
    *   **Accessibility and Proliferation**: How easily could the technology or knowledge to replicate it spread to actors with malicious intent?
    *   **Difficulty in Control/Verification**: Once developed
 how hard is it to monitor or control its use or prevent its misuse?
    *   **Impact on Human Rights**: Potential for the technology to be used in ways that violate human rights (e.g.
 surveillance
 autonomous weapons if applicable).

**4. Assessment of Potential Harms (based on `{potential_misuse_concerns_list_csv}`)**
    *   Summarize the potential severity and nature of harms associated with the identified misuses.

**5. Proposed Safeguards and Mitigation Strategies**
    *   **Technical Safeguards**: Are there ways to design the technology to make misuse more difficult (e.g.
 built-in limitations
 usage restrictions
 tamper-proofing
 tracking mechanisms)?
    *   **Policy and Regulatory Safeguards**: Suggestions for governance frameworks
 export controls
 international treaties
 or ethical oversight bodies that could mitigate risks.
    *   **Transparency and Open Dialogue**: Importance of public discussion and engagement with policymakers and ethicists throughout the technology's lifecycle.
    *   **End-User Vetting and Agreements**: Potential for controlling distribution to responsible parties.

**6. Conclusion and Recommendation**
    *   Summarize the key ethical risks associated with the dual-use potential of `{technology_description_and_capabilities}`.
    *   Provide a concluding thought on whether development should proceed
 and if so
 under what ethical conditions or with what mandatory safeguards.
    *   Suggest if a more comprehensive ethical review by a dedicated committee is warranted.

**IMPORTANT**: This is a PRELIMINARY assessment. The aim is to raise awareness and stimulate deeper ethical reflection
 not to provide a definitive judgment. Focus on balancing innovation with responsibility.
							

Prompt AI per Experimental Plan Critique and Improvement Suggestions

This prompt asks the AI to analyze a provided experimental design in mechanical engineering, identifying weaknesses and proposing detailed improvements to enhance validity, reliability, and efficiency. The user inputs the experimental plan description and key variables.

Uscita: 

				
					Critically analyze the following mechanical engineering experimental plan: {experimental_plan}. Consider the key variables: {key_variables}. Identify potential flaws or limitations in design, controls, sample size, measurement methods, and data collection. Suggest specific improvements or alternative approaches to increase validity, reliability, and efficiency. Present your analysis in a numbered list with clear rationale for each suggestion.
							

Prompt AI per Grant Proposal Significance Section Draft

Drafts the Significance and Innovation sections for a mechanical engineering grant proposal highlighting the project’s novelty research gap addressed and potential impact. This prompt helps engineers articulate the core value of their proposed work. The output is a markdown formatted text.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Scientific Writing Assistant specializing in engineering grant proposals.
Your TASK is to draft the 'Significance' and 'Innovation' sections (or a combined 'Significance and Innovation' section) for a grant proposal titled '`{project_title}`'.
The draft should clearly articulate the importance of the `{research_problem_statement}`
 the novelty of the `{proposed_solution_summary}`
 and the potential impact of the research
 drawing upon the `{key_innovative_aspects_list_csv}` (CSV string: 'Aspect_ID
Description_of_Innovation').

**DRAFT SECTIONS (MUST be Markdown format):**

**`{project_title}`**

**Significance**

1.  **Critical Need/Problem Statement**:
    *   Elaborate on the `{research_problem_statement}`. Clearly define the existing challenge
 knowledge gap
 or unmet need in the field of mechanical engineering that this project addresses.
    *   Explain the current limitations or drawbacks of existing approaches or technologies.
    *   Quantify the problem if possible (e.g.
 'Current methods result in X% energy loss'
 'Failures due to Y cost the industry $Z annually').
2.  **Impact if Successful**:
    *   Describe the potential impact of successfully completing this project. How will the `{proposed_solution_summary}` advance scientific knowledge
 technological capability
 or address societal needs?
    *   Who will benefit from this research (e.g.
 specific industries
 researchers
 society at large)?
    *   Discuss broader impacts
 such as contributions to education
 diversity
 or economic development
 if applicable.
3.  **Relevance to Funder's Mission (Generic - user to tailor if funder is known)**:
    *   Briefly connect the project's goals to typical missions of funding agencies focused on scientific and technological advancement (e.g.
 advancing fundamental knowledge
 fostering innovation
 enhancing national competitiveness
 solving critical societal problems).

**Innovation**

1.  **Novelty of Approach/Concept**:
    *   Clearly explain what is fundamentally new and innovative about the `{proposed_solution_summary}` and the project's overall approach.
    *   Refer to specific points from `{key_innovative_aspects_list_csv}`. For each innovative aspect:
        *   Describe the innovation in detail.
        *   Explain how it departs from or improves upon current paradigms
 theories
 methods
 or technologies.
2.  **Advancement Beyond Current State-of-the-Art**:
    *   Contrast the proposed work with existing methods
 highlighting the advancements it offers.
    *   Why is this approach likely to be more effective
 efficient
 or transformative than current alternatives?
3.  **Potential for Paradigm Shift (if applicable)**:
    *   If the project has the potential to significantly change the way research is conducted or problems are solved in this field
 articulate this potential.

**Overall Summary of Significance and Innovation**:
    *   A brief concluding paragraph that powerfully reiterates why this project is important
 innovative
 and worthy of funding.

**IMPORTANT**: The tone should be persuasive
 confident
 and scholarly. Ensure clear connections between the problem
 the proposed innovative solution
 and the expected impact. Avoid jargon where possible or explain it.
							

Prompt AI per Optimal Experimental Design Generator

This prompt instructs the AI to design an optimal experiment to investigate specified mechanical engineering parameters. The user provides the research question, variables to test, and constraints. The AI returns a full experimental plan with control groups, sample sizes, and measurement strategies.

Uscita: 

				
					Design an optimal experimental plan for the mechanical engineering research question: {research_question}. The variables to be tested are: {variables}. Consider the following constraints: {constraints}. Provide a detailed plan including experimental setup, control groups, number of samples, measurement techniques, data collection methods, and statistical analysis approach. Format your response using markdown with sections and bullet points. Emphasize efficiency and validity in your design.
							

Prompt AI per Technical Report Abstract Generator

Generates a concise and informative abstract for a technical report based on key sections of the report. This prompt helps engineers quickly summarize their work for wider dissemination. The output is a plain text abstract.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Technical Editor specializing in engineering reports.
Your TASK is to generate a concise and informative abstract for a technical report titled '`{report_title}`'.
The abstract should be based on the following summaries provided by the user:
    *   `{project_objectives_summary}`: A brief statement of the project's goals.
    *   `{methodology_used_summary}`: A concise description of the methods
 tools
 or approaches employed.
    *   `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`: A summary of the most important findings and the main conclusions drawn from the project.

**ABSTRACT GENERATION GUIDELINES:**

The abstract MUST be a single paragraph
 typically between 150-250 words (though this is a guideline
 quality over strict length).
It should be structured to include the following elements seamlessly:

1.  **Background/Purpose (derived from `{project_objectives_summary}` and `{report_title}`):**
    *   Start with a sentence or two that introduces the context or purpose of the work described in '`{report_title}`' and its main objectives from `{project_objectives_summary}`.
2.  **Methodology (derived from `{methodology_used_summary}`):**
    *   Briefly describe the key methods
 experimental procedures
 simulation techniques
 or analytical approaches used
 as outlined in `{methodology_used_summary}`. Avoid excessive detail; focus on what was done.
3.  **Key Results (derived from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`):**
    *   Highlight the most significant findings or outcomes of the project. Quantify results where possible and impactful (e.g.
 'a 25% improvement in efficiency was observed'
 'the material exhibited a tensile strength of X MPa').
4.  **Main Conclusions (derived from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`):**
    *   State the primary conclusions drawn from the results. What is the overall significance of the findings?
5.  **Keywords (Optional but Recommended - AI to suggest 3-5 based on content):**
    *   If appropriate
 the AI can suggest a few keywords at the end of the abstract text
 prefixed with 'Keywords:'. This is a secondary task.

**Output Format:**
Plain text
 suitable for direct inclusion in a technical report.

**Example Abstract Structure (Conceptual):**
`This report
 '`{report_title}`'
 details an investigation aimed at [paraphrase/combine from `{project_objectives_summary}`]. The study employed [summarize from `{methodology_used_summary}`
 e.g.
 'a combination of finite element analysis and experimental validation' or 'a novel design algorithm']. Key findings indicate [summarize key quantitative or qualitative results from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`]. It was concluded that [summarize main conclusions from `{key_results_and_conclusions_summary}`
 highlighting significance].`
`Keywords: [Suggested Keyword1
 Suggested Keyword2
 Suggested Keyword3]`

**IMPORTANT**: The abstract MUST be self-contained and understandable without reference to the full report. It should be accurate
 concise
 and highlight the most compelling aspects of the work. Avoid using jargon that isn't commonly understood or defined within the abstract's context.
							

Prompt AI per Statistical Power Analysis for Experiments

This prompt requests the AI to perform a statistical power analysis for a mechanical engineering experiment based on input parameters such as effect size, sample size, and significance level. It helps determine if the experiment is sufficiently powered.

Uscita: 

				
					Perform a statistical power analysis for a mechanical engineering experiment with the following parameters: Effect Size: {effect_size}, Sample Size: {sample_size}, Significance Level (alpha): {significance_level}. Calculate the statistical power and interpret whether the current design is adequate. If underpowered, suggest adjustments to sample size or effect size. Present calculations step-by-step and summarize the conclusion clearly.
							

Prompt AI per Research Paper Methodology Critique

Reviews and suggests improvements for the methodology section of a mechanical engineering research paper focusing on clarity completeness justification and appropriateness of the methods used. This prompt aids in enhancing the rigor and reproducibility of research. The output is a markdown formatted critique.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Peer Reviewer for a Mechanical Engineering journal.
Your TASK is to critique the provided `{current_methodology_section_text}` from a research paper
 keeping in mind the stated `{research_objectives_text}` and the `{key_equipment_or_software_used_list_csv}` (CSV: 'Item_Name
Model_Specification
Manufacturer').
The critique should focus on improving clarity
 completeness
 justification
 and appropriateness of the described methodology.

**CRITIQUE AND RECOMMENDATIONS (MUST be Markdown format):**

**Critique of Methodology Section for Research Objectives: '`{research_objectives_text}`'**

**1. Overall Clarity and Structure:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Evaluate the overall readability
 logical flow
 and organization of the `{current_methodology_section_text}`. Is it easy to follow? Are steps presented in a logical sequence?]
    *   **Recommendations**: [Suggest improvements to structure
 e.g.
 'Consider using subheadings for distinct phases of the methodology like Experimental Setup
 Data Collection
 and Data Analysis.' or 'Clarify the transition between step X and step Y.']

**2. Completeness of Description:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Are all necessary details provided for another researcher to replicate the study? Consider aspects like:]
        *   Sample preparation (if applicable).
        *   Detailed parameters for `{key_equipment_or_software_used_list_csv}`.
        *   Environmental conditions.
        *   Duration
 frequency
 or number of measurements/simulations.
        *   Specific protocols or standards followed (and if they are cited).
    *   **Recommendations**: [Point out specific missing information
 e.g.
 'Specify the sampling rate used for data acquisition with [Sensor Name].' or 'Provide details on the mesh convergence study for the FEA model using [Software Name].' or 'Describe the calibration procedure for [Instrument Name].']

**3. Justification and Appropriateness of Methods:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Are the chosen methods
 materials
 and equipment appropriate for achieving the `{research_objectives_text}`? Is the choice of methods justified
 either explicitly or implicitly through common practice? Are any limitations of the chosen methods acknowledged?]
    *   **Recommendations**: [Suggest areas where justification is weak or missing
 e.g.
 'Explain why [Specific Method A] was chosen over [Alternative Method B] for addressing [Specific Objective].' or 'Discuss the potential impact of using [Material Grade X] if its properties significantly differ from those assumed in the model.']

**4. Data Analysis and Statistical Treatment (if described):**
    *   **Assessment**: [If data analysis or statistical methods are mentioned
 are they appropriate and clearly described? Are error analysis or uncertainty quantification addressed?]
    *   **Recommendations**: [e.g.
 'Specify the statistical tests used to compare groups.' or 'Clarify how outliers were handled in the dataset.']

**5. Reproducibility:**
    *   **Assessment**: [Overall
 does the section provide enough information to ensure that the work is reproducible?]
    *   **General Recommendations**: [Summarize key actions to enhance reproducibility.]

**Specific Comments/Queries (line numbers or specific phrases can be referenced if the AI were to see the original text with them):**
    *   [e.g.
 'Regarding the statement "...optimized parameters were used..."
 please specify how these parameters were optimized and what the final values were.']
    *   [e.g.
 'The description of [Equipment X from `{key_equipment_or_software_used_list_csv}`] lacks details on its accuracy/resolution
 which could be important.']

**IMPORTANT**: The critique should be constructive
 specific
 and aimed at helping the author improve the methodology section. Refer to the `{research_objectives_text}` to ensure alignment.
							

Prompt AI per Experimental Data Validation Checklist Creator

This prompt asks the AI to generate a detailed checklist for validating mechanical engineering experimental data quality and integrity based on the experiment description and data type provided by the user.

Uscita: 

				
					Create a comprehensive checklist for validating the quality and integrity of experimental data in mechanical engineering. The experiment description is: {experiment_description}. The type of data collected is: {data_type}. The checklist should cover data collection methods, calibration, error sources, data consistency, and documentation practices. Format the checklist in markdown with numbered items and subpoints. Highlight critical validation steps.
							
Sommario
    Añadir una cabecera para empezar a generar el índice

    SFIDA DI DESIGN o DI PROGETTO?
    Ingegnere meccanico, responsabile di progetto o di ricerca e sviluppo
    Sviluppo efficace del prodotto

    Disponibile per una nuova sfida con breve preavviso in Francia e Svizzera.
    Contattami su LinkedIn
    Prodotti in plastica e metallo, Design-to-cost, Ergonomia, Volume medio-alto, Settori regolamentati, CE e FDA, CAD, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, ISO 13485 Classe II e III

    Stiamo cercando un nuovo sponsor

     

    La vostra azienda o istituzione si occupa di tecnica, scienza o ricerca?
    > inviaci un messaggio <

    Ricevi tutti i nuovi articoli
    Gratuito, no spam, email non distribuita né rivenduta

    oppure puoi ottenere la tua iscrizione completa -gratuitamente- per accedere a tutti i contenuti riservati >Qui<

    Argomenti trattati: test, convalida, input dell'utente, raccolta dati, meccanismo di feedback, test interattivi, progettazione di indagini, test di usabilità, valutazione del software, progettazione sperimentale, valutazione delle prestazioni, questionario, ISO 9241, ISO 25010, ISO 20282, ISO 13407 e ISO 26362.

    1. Wynter

      Stiamo dando per scontato che l'IA possa sempre generare i migliori prompt in ingegneria meccanica? Come vengono generati?

    2. Giselle

      L'intelligenza artificiale renderà superflui gli ingegneri umani?

    Lascia un commento

    Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

    Post correlati

    Torna in alto

    Potrebbe anche piacerti