For the results of an ANOVA to be considered valid, several key assumptions about the data must be met. These are: (1) Independence of observations, meaning the errors are uncorrelated. (2) Normality, where the residuals for each group are approximately normally distributed. (3) Homoscedasticity, or homogeneity of variances, meaning the variance of residuals is equal across all groups.
Assumptions of ANOVA
These assumptions relate to the residuals (the differences between observed values and the group means), not the raw data itself. Independence is the most critical assumption and is typically ensured by proper experimental design and random sampling; violations can lead to severely biased results. Normality means the distribution of residuals within each group should follow a bell curve. ANOVA is considered relatively robust to moderate violations of this assumption, especially with large and balanced sample sizes, due to the Central Limit Theorem. Homoscedasticity ([latex]\sigma_1^2 = \sigma_2^2 = \dots = \sigma_k^2[/latex]) means the spread or scatter of data points around their group mean should be similar for all groups. Significant violation of this assumption (heteroscedasticity) can increase the rate of Type I errors. Statisticians have developed diagnostic tools to check these assumptions. For example, Q-Q plots can assess normality, and Levene’s test or Bartlett’s test can check for homogeneity of variances. If assumptions are severely violated, researchers may need to transform the data or use alternative statistical methods that do not rely on these assumptions.
Taper
Perturbation
Usage
Précurseurs
- Central Limit Theorem (Abraham de Moivre, Pierre-Simon Laplace)
- Theory of the normal distribution (Carl Friedrich Gauss)
- Concept of statistical residuals from regression models
- Development of formal hypothesis testing (Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson)
Applications
- diagnostic checking in statistical modeling to ensure validity
- guiding data transformation (e.g., log transform to correct for heteroscedasticity)
- informing the choice of non-parametric alternatives like the Kruskal-Wallis test when assumptions are violated
- ensuring the reliability of scientific research findings published in peer-reviewed journals
- validating the results of A/B testing in business analytics
Brevets:
Idées d'innovations potentielles
!niveaux !!! Adhésion obligatoire
Vous devez être membre de l'association pour accéder à ce contenu.
DISPONIBLE POUR DE NOUVEAUX DÉFIS
Ingénieur mécanique, chef de projet, ingénierie des procédés ou R&D
Disponible pour un nouveau défi dans un court délai.
Contactez-moi sur LinkedIn
Intégration électronique métal-plastique, Conception à coût réduit, BPF, Ergonomie, Appareils et consommables de volume moyen à élevé, Production allégée, Secteurs réglementés, CE et FDA, CAO, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, ISO 13485 médical
Nous recherchons un nouveau sponsor
Votre entreprise ou institution est dans le domaine de la technique, de la science ou de la recherche ?
> envoyez-nous un message <
Recevez tous les nouveaux articles
Gratuit, pas de spam, email non distribué ni revendu
ou vous pouvez obtenir votre adhésion complète - gratuitement - pour accéder à tout le contenu restreint >ici<
Inventions, innovations et principes techniques connexes