Hogar » EMF vs. Potential Difference

EMF vs. Potential Difference

1870
  • James Clerk Maxwell

Electromotive force (EMF) and electric potential difference (voltage) are distinct concepts, though both are measured in volts. EMF is the work per unit charge done by a non-conservative force (e.g., chemical reaction, changing magnetic field) to move charge within a source. Potential difference is the work per unit charge done by the conservative electrostatic field between two points.

The core difference between EMF and potential difference lies in the nature of the underlying fields. The electrostatic field ([latex]\mathbf{E}_{c}[/latex]), created by static charges, is conservative. This means the work it does on a charge moving around any closed loop is zero: [latex]\oint \mathbf{E}_{c} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = 0[/latex]. The potential difference, or voltage, between two points is the line integral of this conservative field, [latex]V = -\int \mathbf{E}_{c} \cdot d\mathbf{l}[/latex]. In contrast, an EMF source generates a non-conservative field or “impressed field” ([latex]\mathbf{E}_{nc}[/latex]). This field does non-zero work on a charge around a closed loop: [latex]\mathcal{E} = \oint \mathbf{E}_{nc} \cdot d\mathbf{l} \neq 0[/latex].

In a simple DC circuit with a battery, the battery provides the EMF. Inside the battery, the non-conservative chemical forces move positive charges from the negative to the positive terminal, against the opposing conservative electrostatic field. This “uphill” journey is where the EMF does its work. Outside the battery, in the external circuit, the charges move “downhill” from the positive to the negative terminal, driven by the conservative electrostatic field. The potential drop across the external resistor is equal to the EMF minus the potential drop across the battery’s internal resistance. Thus, EMF is the cause of the sustained current, while potential difference is the measure of energy dissipated per unit charge in a part of the circuit.

UNESCO Nomenclature: 2205
– Electricity and Magnetism

Tipo

Abstract System

Disruption

Foundational

Utilización

Widespread Use

Precursors

  • Alessandro Volta’s work on electric potential
  • Georg Ohm’s law relating voltage, current, and resistance
  • Gustav Kirchhoff’s circuit laws
  • James Clerk Maxwell’s field equations

Aplicaciones

  • circuit analysis (kirchhoff’s voltage law)
  • battery design and characterization
  • understanding of generators and motors
  • thermoelectric device analysis

Patentes:

ESO

Potential Innovations Ideas

Membresía obligatoria de Professionals (100% free)

Debes ser miembro de Professionals (100% free) para acceder a este contenido.

Únete ahora

¿Ya eres miembro? Accede aquí
Related to: emf, potential difference, voltage, conservative field, non-conservative field, electrostatic field, kirchhoff’s laws, circuit theory

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

DISPONIBLE PARA NUEVOS RETOS
Ingeniero Mecánico, Gerente de Proyectos o de I+D
Desarrollo eficaz de productos

Disponible para un nuevo desafío a corto plazo.
Contáctame en LinkedIn
Integración de electrónica de plástico y metal, diseño a coste, GMP, ergonomía, dispositivos y consumibles de volumen medio a alto, industrias reguladas, CE y FDA, CAD, Solidworks, cinturón negro Lean Sigma, ISO 13485 médico

Estamos buscando un nuevo patrocinador

 

¿Su empresa o institución se dedica a la técnica, la ciencia o la investigación?
> Envíanos un mensaje <

Recibe todos los artículos nuevos
Gratuito, sin spam, correo electrónico no distribuido ni revendido.

o puedes obtener tu membresía completa -gratis- para acceder a todo el contenido restringido >aquí<

Historical Context

(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)

Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles

Scroll al inicio

También te puede interesar