» 基于风险的医疗器械分类

基于风险的医疗器械分类

1976-05-28
监管办公室现场,由专业人员按风险等级对医疗器械进行分类。

(generate image for illustration only)

医疗器械根据其对患者和使用者构成的风险进行分类。美国FDA和欧盟等监管机构采用的这种基于风险的分类方法通常包含三到四个等级(例如,I类、IIa类、IIb类、III类)。压舌板等低风险器械属于I类,而起搏器等高风险生命维持器械属于III类。

The risk-based classification system is a cornerstone of modern 医疗器械 regulation worldwide. It acknowledges that a one-size-fits-all regulatory approach is inefficient and potentially unsafe. Instead of subjecting every device to the most stringent review, regulators tailor their oversight to the potential for harm. The classification is determined by factors such as the device’s intended use, duration of contact with the body, degree of invasiveness, and whether it delivers energy or has a biological effect.

For example, in the United States, Class I devices (e.g., elastic bandages) are subject to ‘General Controls,’ which include registration and proper labeling. Class II devices (e.g., infusion pumps, powered wheelchairs) require ‘Special Controls’ in addition to general ones, often including performance standards and premarket notification (510(k)). The highest risk category, Class III (e.g., implantable pacemakers, heart valves), requires the most rigorous ‘Premarket Approval’ (PMA), which involves submitting extensive clinical data to prove safety and effectiveness.

This tiered system allows regulatory agencies to focus their resources on devices that pose the greatest risk, while facilitating market access for lower-risk innovations. The concept was foundational to the US Medical Device Amendments of 1976 and has been adopted and adapted by regulatory bodies globally, forming the basis for frameworks like the European Union’s Medical Device Regulation (MDR).

UNESCO Nomenclature: 3201
– Public Health

类型

抽象系统

中断

递增

使用方法

广泛使用

前体

  • 沙利度胺悲剧(凸显了药物监管的必要性,影响了设备监管)
  • 达尔康盾牌事件(1976 年医疗器械修正案的关键驱动因素)
  • 工程风险管理一般原则的制定
  • 建立国家卫生当局(例如 1906 年的 FDA)

应用

  • 简化低风险设备的上市前审批流程
  • 分级上市后监管要求
  • 国际监管协调努力(imdrf)
  • development of quality management systems like ISO 13485 tailored to risk

专利:

NA

潜在的创新想法

级别需要会员

您必须是!!等级!!会员才能访问此内容。

立即加入

已经是会员? 在此登录
Related to: medical device classification, risk-based regulation, FDA class I, FDA class II, FDA class III, premarket approval, 510(k), medical device regulation, public health, safety.

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

迎接新挑战
机械工程师、项目、工艺工程师或研发经理
有效的产品开发

可在短时间内接受新的挑战。
通过 LinkedIn 联系我
塑料金属电子集成、成本设计、GMP、人体工程学、中高容量设备和耗材、精益制造、受监管行业、CE 和 FDA、CAD、Solidworks、精益西格玛黑带、医疗 ISO 13485

我们正在寻找新的赞助商

 

您的公司或机构从事技术、科学或研究吗?
> 给我们发送消息 <

接收所有新文章
免费,无垃圾邮件,电子邮件不分发也不转售

或者您可以免费获得完整会员资格以访问所有受限制的内容>这里<

历史背景

基于风险的医疗器械分类

1960
1960
1969
1976-05-28
1980
1990
1960
1965
1970
1980
1980

(如果日期不详或不相关,例如 "流体力学",则对其显著出现的时间作了四舍五入的估计)。

相关发明、创新和技术原理

滚动至顶部

你可能还喜欢