Methodologies: Customers & Marketing, Ergonomics, Product Design

Equivalence Partitioning

Agile Methodology, Continuous Improvement, Process Improvement, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Quality Management, Software Testing, Testing Methods, Validation

Equivalence Partitioning

Agile Methodology, Continuous Improvement, Process Improvement, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Quality Management, Software Testing, Testing Methods, Validation

Objective:

To reduce the number of test cases to a manageable level while maintaining reasonable test coverage.

How it’s used:

Divides the input data of a software unit into partitions of equivalent data from which test cases can be derived. The assumption is that if one value in a partition works, all values in that partition will work.

Pros

Reduces the number of test cases needed; Efficiently covers a wide range of inputs.

Cons

May not catch errors at the boundaries of partitions; Requires careful analysis to define partitions correctly.

Categories:

Engineering, Quality

Best for:

Efficiently testing software applications with a large number of possible inputs.

Equivalence Partitioning is particularly advantageous in software testing phases, primarily during system and integration testing, where the focus is on validating the functionality of software applications with diverse input ranges. This methodology sees prevalent applications across various sectors such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and e-commerce, where applications frequently handle extensive input domains, including user inputs, transaction data, and configuration settings. For instance, in an online payment system, inputs could include transaction amounts, card numbers, and expiration dates, where partitioning can isolate valid and invalid ranges, thereby ensuring comprehensive coverage without exhaustive testing. Initiators of this methodology typically include quality assurance teams and test engineers, often in collaboration with software developers to create effective test cases that efficiently validate software behavior in real-world scenarios. Participants in this process usually encompass stakeholders from development, testing, and product management to ensure a diverse perspective on potential inputs and their expected outcomes. The systematic approach of Equivalence Partitioning not only provides efficient coverage of functional requirements but also significantly reduces the overhead associated with manual test case creation while enhancing test reliability.

Key steps of this methodology

Identify the input data that the software unit can accept.
Divide the input data into equivalence classes based on similar behavior.
Determine valid and invalid partitions for each class.
Select test cases from each partition, aiming for representative values.
Execute test cases to verify functionality across partitions.

Pro Tips

Incorporate boundary value analysis with equivalence partitioning to enhance test coverage and identify edge cases effectively.
Regularly review and update partitions as requirements evolve to ensure that all relevant input scenarios remain covered.
Utilize automated testing tools that support equivalence partitioning to swiftly generate and manage test cases based on defined partitions.

To read and compare several methodologies, we recommend the

> Extensive Methodologies Repository <
together with the 400+ other methodologies.

Your comments on this methodology or additional info are welcome on the comment section below ↓ , so as any engineering-related ideas or links.