A product development approach where different stages of development (e.g., design, engineering, manufacturing, testing) are run in parallel (concurrently) rather than sequentially, with strong emphasis on cross-functional collaboration from the outset.
- Methodologies: Engineering, Project Management, Quality
Concurrent Engineering

Concurrent Engineering
- Agile Methodology, Continuous Improvement, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Design for Manufacturing (DfM), Lean Manufacturing, Product Development, Product Lifecycle, Project Management, Quality Management
Objective:
How it’s used:
- Cross-functional teams work together from the early stages of product development, sharing information and considering all aspects of the product lifecycle (design, manufacturability, cost, quality, serviceability) simultaneously.
Pros
- Reduces product development time and time-to-market; Improves product quality by identifying and addressing issues earlier; Enhances communication and collaboration between different departments; Can lower development and manufacturing costs.
Cons
- Requires significant changes in organizational structure and culture to support cross-functional teams; Can increase complexity in project management and coordination; Needs effective communication tools and processes; May require upfront investment in training and technology.
Categories:
- Engineering, Manufacturing, Product Design, Project Management, Quality
Best for:
- Accelerating product development and improving product quality by integrating design, manufacturing, and other functions to work in parallel from the start.
Concurrent Engineering is commonly applied in industries such as aerospace, automotive, consumer electronics, and medical devices, where the intricacies of product design and development demand high levels of collaboration among diverse teams. For instance, in the aerospace sector, manufacturers integrate inputs from design engineers, materials specialists, and manufacturing teams early in the project phase to address weight constraints, safety regulations, and performance metrics concurrently, which significantly contributes to delivering compliant and efficient aircraft. In the automotive industry, cross-functional teams engage from the initial concept through to prototyping, allowing for simultaneous assessment of design feasibility, regulatory compliance, and cost implications. The methodology can be particularly effective during the design phase of projects where time sensitivity and competitive pressures are intense, as it enables real-time feedback loops among engineering, marketing, supply chain, and quality assurance domains. Participation typically includes design engineers, manufacturing specialists, product managers, and marketing professionals, which creates a multidisciplinary environment that supports innovation. This integrated approach not only accelerates development cycles but also minimizes the risk of costly post-launch modifications, thereby enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty. Furthermore, tools such as computer-aided design (CAD) and product lifecycle management (PLM) software often facilitate these collaborative efforts, allowing teams to share data seamlessly and track project progress in real time.
Key steps of this methodology
- Identify customer requirements and expectations early in the development process.
- Establish cross-functional teams that include representatives from all relevant departments.
- Conduct concurrent design reviews to assess compatibility of design with manufacturing processes.
- Develop prototypes rapidly to test design concepts and gather feedback quickly.
- Iterate on designs based on feedback from all functional areas, including manufacturing and marketing.
- Implement design-for-manufacturability principles to ensure ease of production.
- Integrate quality assurance processes throughout the development cycle to identify potential issues.
- Prepare for serviceability by including maintenance considerations from the start.
- Continuously align team goals with project milestones to maintain progress and accountability.
Pro Tips
- Implement Design Reviews at key milestones to assess design decisions and gather interdisciplinary feedback, preventing late-stage revisions.
- Use Digital Twin technology to simulate product performance during engineering and design, allowing teams to resolve issues before physical prototyping.
- Establish Cross-Functional KPIs that measure collaboration effectiveness and product lifecycle performance, ensuring accountability and alignment among team members.
To read and compare several methodologies, we recommend the
> Extensive Methodologies Repository <
together with the 400+ other methodologies.
Your comments on this methodology or additional info are welcome on the comment section below ↓ , so as any engineering-related ideas or links.
Related Posts
Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires
Multivariate Testing (MVT)
Multiple Regression Analysis
Motion Capture Systems
MoSCoW Method
Mood’s Median Test