Methodologies: Engineering, Product Design, Project Management

Buddy Testing

Agile Methodology, Continuous Improvement, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Design Thinking, Quality Assurance, Quality Management, Software Testing, User Testing, Verification and Validation

Buddy Testing

Agile Methodology, Continuous Improvement, Cross-Functional Collaboration, Design Thinking, Quality Assurance, Quality Management, Software Testing, User Testing, Verification and Validation

Objective:

An informal testing technique where a developer and a tester work together as ‘buddies’ to test a unit or module of code.

How it’s used:

The developer and tester sit together to collaboratively review and test the code right after it's been developed, aiming to catch bugs before the formal testing phase begins.

Pros

Fosters collaboration between development and testing teams, facilitates knowledge sharing, and allows for the early detection of defects, reducing rework costs.

Cons

Its informal nature means it can be less thorough than structured testing, its success depends on the interpersonal skills of the buddies, and it is not a substitute for a formal QA cycle.

Categories:

Engineering, Project Management, Quality

Best for:

Early-stage bug detection and improving code quality through developer-tester collaboration.

Buddy Testing is particularly advantageous in Agile and DevOps environments, where iterative development necessitates rapid feedback loops and adaptability. This methodology is often employed during the coding phase of software projects to ensure that functionality and performance standards are met before entering more formal testing against specifications. With developers and testers engaging in real-time collaboration, this approach is commonly found in industries like finance, telecommunications, and healthcare, where software reliability is paramount due to stringent regulatory requirements. In Agile teams, this practice typically sees participation from software engineers, quality assurance analysts, and sometimes product owners, who can provide contextual feedback related to user requirements. Conducting Buddy Testing can take place in dedicated testing sessions or during pair programming activities, allowing an opportunity for live debugging while promoting an understanding of the application’s architecture and user needs. This method not only enhances code quality but also accelerates the development cycle, as early identification of bugs minimizes delays in later testing phases. Additionally, it encourages a culture of shared responsibility for product quality, motivating all team members to contribute and collaborate on problem-solving as they work towards a common goal.

Key steps of this methodology

Review the code together, focusing on logic and structure.
Identify and discuss potential bugs immediately.
Use debugging tools in conjunction to pinpoint issues.
Make live edits or adjustments to address issues found.
Test individual components collaboratively in real-time.
Encourage open dialogue about design and functional decisions.
Record findings and decisions made during the session.
Reassess any changes for immediate impact on functionality.

Pro Tips

Implement pair programming to enhance real-time feedback, allowing testers to immediately spot discrepancies and suggest improvements.
Utilize task-based scenarios during buddy testing sessions, linking the code functionality directly to user expectations, which aids in identifying potential usability issues early.
Schedule regular knowledge-sharing workshops where developers and testers can discuss patterns in past defects, improving each other's understanding of code and enhancing testing strategies.

To read and compare several methodologies, we recommend the

> Extensive Methodologies Repository <
together with the 400+ other methodologies.

Your comments on this methodology or additional info are welcome on the comment section below ↓ , so as any engineering-related ideas or links.