Casa » I migliori prompt di intelligenza artificiale per l'ingegneria meccanica

I migliori prompt di intelligenza artificiale per l'ingegneria meccanica

L'intelligenza artificiale stimola l'ingegneria meccanica
Ai ingegneria meccanica
Gli strumenti Ai-driven stanno rivoluzionando l'ingegneria meccanica migliorando l'ottimizzazione della progettazione, la velocità di simulazione, la manutenzione predittiva e la selezione dei materiali attraverso l'analisi avanzata dei dati e il riconoscimento dei modelli.

Gli strumenti di intelligenza artificiale online stanno rapidamente trasformando l'ingegneria meccanica aumentando le capacità umane di progettazione e analisi, produzionee manutenzione. Questi sistemi di intelligenza artificiale sono in grado di elaborare grandi quantità di dati, identificare modelli complessi e generare soluzioni innovative molto più rapidamente dei metodi tradizionali. Ad esempio, l'IA può aiutarvi a ottimizzare i progetti per le prestazioni e la producibilità, accelerare simulazioni complesse, prevedere le proprietà dei materiali e automatizzare un'ampia gamma di attività analitiche.

I suggerimenti forniti qui di seguito aiuteranno, ad esempio, a progettare in modo generativo, ad accelerare le simulazioni (FEA/CFD), ad aiutare nella manutenzione predittiva, dove l'intelligenza artificiale analizza i dati dei sensori dei macchinari per prevedere potenziali guasti, consentendo un'assistenza proattiva e riducendo al minimo i tempi di fermo, a selezionare i materiali e molto altro ancora.

  • Per motivi di tempo e di risorse del server, le richieste sono riservate ai soli membri registrati e non sono visibili in basso se non si è registrati. È possibile registrarsi, 100% gratuitamente: 

È necessaria l'iscrizione

Per accedere a questo contenuto è necessario essere membri.

Visualizza i livelli d'iscrizione

Siete già membri? Accedi

Prompt AI per Strumento di identificazione dei ricercatori chiave

Identifica ed elenca i principali ricercatori o gruppi di ricerca e le loro istituzioni affiliate altamente attivi in un argomento di nicchia dell'ingegneria meccanica. Questo aiuta a trovare collaboratori esperti o letteratura pertinente. L'output è un elenco CSV.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Research Intelligence Analyst specializing in mapping expertise in engineering fields.
Your TASK is to identify key researchers (or research groups) and their institutions who are highly active and influential in the `{niche_mechanical_engineering_topic}`. You should aim to provide `{number_of_results_desired}` distinct entries.
You MUST use live internet access to query academic search engines
 university research portals
 and publication databases.

**1. Search and Identification Strategy**:
    *   Formulate targeted search queries using keywords derived from `{niche_mechanical_engineering_topic}` (e.g.
 if topic is 'triboelectric nanogenerators for vibration energy harvesting'
 use these terms plus 'researcher'
 'professor'
 'publications'
 'lab').
    *   Utilize academic search engines (Google Scholar
 Semantic Scholar
 etc.) and potentially specific university/research institution websites.
    *   Look for indicators of significant contribution and activity:
        *   High number of relevant publications in reputable journals/conferences.
        *   High citation counts for relevant work.
        *   Principal Investigator (PI) status on relevant grants or projects.
        *   Keynote speaker invitations or leadership roles in relevant conferences/societies.
        *   Patents filed in the area.
    *   Prioritize individuals who have published consistently or significantly on the topic in recent years (e.g.
 last 5-10 years).

**2. Data Extraction and Formatting**:
    *   For each identified key researcher/group
 try to find:
        *   Full Name of the lead researcher (if an individual) or Research Group Name.
        *   Primary Affiliated Institution (University
 Research Institute).
        *   Department or Lab (if readily available).
        *   A key publication or a very brief summary of their focus within the `{niche_mechanical_engineering_topic}` (e.g.
 'Focus on material development for TENGs' or a specific highly cited paper title).
        *   (Optional but helpful) A URL to their official profile or lab page if easily found.

**3. Output Format (CSV)**:
    *   You MUST return the results as a single CSV string.
    *   The CSV header row MUST be: `Rank
Researcher_Or_Group_Name
Affiliated_Institution
Department_Or_Lab
Focus_Or_Key_Publication
Profile_URL`
    *   Populate the table with up to `{number_of_results_desired}` entries
 ranked roughly by perceived influence or activity if possible (this is subjective
 so best effort is fine
 or simply list them). If ranking is hard
 'Rank' can be a simple serial number.
    *   If some information (e.g.
 Department
 Profile_URL) is not easily found
 leave that cell blank in the CSV row but maintain comma separators.

    Example of a CSV row:
    `1
Prof. John Doe
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
Pioneering work on XYZ sensors
http://mit.edu/johndoe`

**IMPORTANT**: The quality of results depends on effective searching and interpretation of academic output. Prioritize relevance to the `{niche_mechanical_engineering_topic}`. State that the list is based on publicly available information accessed at the time of the query.
							

Prompt AI per Metodologia di progettazione Analisi dell'evoluzione

Analizza e delinea l'evoluzione storica, le pietre miliari e le tendenze attuali di una specifica metodologia o filosofia di progettazione meccanica. Questo aiuta gli ingegneri a comprendere il contesto e i progressi degli approcci di progettazione. L'output è una narrazione o una linea temporale in markdown.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as an Engineering Design Historian and Theorist.
Your TASK is to analyze and outline the evolution of the mechanical design methodology known as `{design_methodology_name}`
 starting from approximately `{approximate_start_year_or_era}` to the present day.
You should use live internet access to research its history
 key proponents
 seminal publications/tools
 and current trends.

**1. Research and Information Gathering**:
    *   Use `{design_methodology_name}` (e.g.
 'Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)'
 'Axiomatic Design'
 'TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving)'
 'Robust Design (Taguchi Methods)'
 'Topology Optimization') and terms like 'history'
 'evolution'
 'key developments'
 'timeline'
 'impact' in your searches.
    *   Consult scholarly articles
 books
 historical accounts
 and reputable engineering resources.
    *   Identify:
        *   Origins and foundational concepts/principles.
        *   Key individuals or organizations that developed or promoted the methodology.
        *   Significant milestones
 publications
 or software tools that marked turning points.
        *   How the methodology has been adapted or integrated with other approaches over time.
        *   Its impact on mechanical engineering practice.
        *   Current trends
 criticisms
 or areas of ongoing development related to it.

**2. Structuring the Analysis (Output as Markdown)**:
    You can choose a chronological narrative or a timeline-based structure. Ensure the following aspects are covered:
    *   **Title**: The Evolution of `{design_methodology_name}` in Mechanical Engineering.
    *   **1. Introduction**: Briefly define `{design_methodology_name}` and state its core objectives.
    *   **2. Origins and Early Development (around `{approximate_start_year_or_era}` and following period)**:
        *   Describe the context or problems that led to its development.
        *   Mention key founders/pioneers and their initial contributions.
    *   **3. Key Milestones and Expansion**:
        *   Detail significant developments
 theoretical refinements
 or practical breakthroughs in chronological order or by thematic progression.
        *   Mention any influential books
 papers
 or case studies that popularized or validated the methodology.
        *   Discuss the development of associated tools or software
 if applicable.
    *   **4. Mainstream Adoption and Impact**:
        *   When and how did it gain wider acceptance in industry and academia?
        *   What has been its primary impact on how mechanical design is approached or taught?
    *   **5. Current Status
 Trends
 and Criticisms**:
        *   How is `{design_methodology_name}` viewed or used today?
        *   Are there new interpretations
 integrations with digital tools (e.g.
 AI
MBSE)
 or extensions of the methodology?
        *   Are there any common criticisms or limitations discussed in the literature?
    *   **6. Future Outlook**:
        *   Brief speculation on its future trajectory or relevance.

**IMPORTANT**: The analysis should be insightful and provide a good historical overview for a mechanical engineer. Focus on conceptual evolution and practical impact. Ensure information is corroborated from reliable sources accessed via the internet.
							

Prompt AI per Identificazione delle lacune di conoscenza dagli abstract

Identifica le potenziali lacune di conoscenza o le aree di ricerca futura in uno specifico settore dell'ingegneria meccanica analizzando una raccolta di abstract di ricerche recenti. Questo aiuta i ricercatori a individuare nuove domande di ricerca. L'output è un elenco markdown.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Research Strategist with expertise in identifying emerging research fronts in Mechanical Engineering.
Your TASK is to analyze a `{collection_of_abstracts_text}` from recent research within the `{research_area_description_text}` and identify potential knowledge gaps
 unanswered questions
 or underexplored aspects that could suggest avenues for future research.

**1. Input Processing**:
    *   `{research_area_description_text}`: A clear description of the specific field or sub-field of mechanical engineering (e.g.
 'Additive Manufacturing of Nickel Superalloys for High-Temperature Applications'
 'Vibration Damping using Metamaterials in Rotating Machinery'
 'Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance of Hydraulic Systems').
    *   `{collection_of_abstracts_text}`: A single block of text containing multiple research paper abstracts (e.g.
 5-10 abstracts). Each abstract should be clearly demarcated if possible
 or just concatenated.

**2. Analysis Methodology**:
    *   **Thematic Analysis**: Read through all abstracts to understand the main themes
 methodologies
 and findings being reported in the `{research_area_description_text}`.
    *   **Identify Common Focus Areas**: What specific problems
 materials
 techniques
 or applications are frequently addressed?
    *   **Look for Limitations Stated**: Do any abstracts explicitly mention limitations of their own work
 or suggest future work? These are direct pointers to gaps.
    *   **Note Unaddressed Intersections**: Are there logical connections between sub-topics that don't seem to be explored? (e.g.
 if one abstract discusses material A for application X
 and another discusses material B for application X
 is the comparison between A and B for X a gap?).
    *   **Consider Unexplored Parameters or Conditions**: Are studies typically focused on a narrow range of conditions
 materials
 or scales? What happens outside these ranges?
    *   **Methodological Gaps**: Are certain advanced methodologies (e.g.
 novel simulation techniques
 AI/ML approaches
 new experimental methods) not yet widely applied in this area despite potential benefits?
    *   **Contradictory or Inconclusive Findings**: Do any abstracts present conflicting results or highlight areas where findings are still inconclusive?
    *   **Assumptions and Simplifications**: What common assumptions are made that might not hold true in all scenarios
 suggesting a need for more complex models or experiments?

**3. Output Format (Markdown)**:
    *   **Title**: Potential Knowledge Gaps and Future Research Directions in `{research_area_description_text}` (Based on Provided Abstracts).
    *   **1. Overview of Current Research Focus**: Briefly summarize the dominant themes identified in the provided abstracts.
    *   **2. Identified Potential Knowledge Gaps / Research Questions**: This is the main section. List each potential gap or research question as a clear
 concise bullet point. For each point
 briefly explain the reasoning based on your analysis of the abstracts. Examples:
        *   `*   **The long-term performance of [Material X] under cyclic thermal loading combined with [Environmental Factor Y] appears underexplored.** While abstracts A and B discuss thermal performance
 and abstract C mentions Factor Y independently
 their combined effect is not addressed.`
        *   `*   **Comparative analysis of [Technique 1] vs. [Technique 2] for achieving [Specific Outcome Z] is lacking.** Abstracts D and E advocate for different techniques but no direct comparison of efficacy or cost-effectiveness was found.`
        *   `*   **Most studies focus on [Specific Scale/Condition A]
 leaving a gap in understanding behavior at [Different Scale/Condition B].** This is evident as abstracts F
 G
 H all operate within Condition A.`
    *   **3. Concluding Remarks**: Briefly reiterate the value of exploring these gaps.

**IMPORTANT**: The identified gaps MUST be logically derived from the content of the `{collection_of_abstracts_text}` and the context of `{research_area_description_text}`. Avoid speculating wildly beyond the provided information. The output should stimulate critical thinking for new research.
							

Prompt AI per Generazione della tabella FMEA per il sottosistema

Genera un modello per un'analisi dei modi di guasto e degli effetti (FMEA) per un sottosistema meccanico specificato, elencando i modi di guasto potenziali che causano effetti e raccomandando valutazioni iniziali di gravità dell'evento e del rilevamento. Questo avvia il processo di valutazione dei rischi. L'output è una struttura di tabella CSV.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Reliability Engineer specializing in FMEA for Mechanical Systems.
Your TASK is to generate a structured FMEA table (as a CSV string) for the `{subsystem_name_and_function}`
 considering its `{key_components_list_csv}` and `{operating_environment_description}`. You should populate the table with common
 plausible failure modes
 causes
 and effects
 and suggest initial placeholder RPN ratings or qualitative assessments.

**1. Input Analysis**:
    *   `{subsystem_name_and_function}`: Clear description (e.g.
 'Fuel Pumping Unit for Diesel Engine - delivers pressurized fuel to injectors'
 'Landing Gear Retraction Actuator - hydraulic cylinder that retracts/deploys landing gear').
    *   `{key_components_list_csv}`: CSV string listing major components within the subsystem (e.g.
 'Pump_Housing
Electric_Motor
Impeller
Pressure_Regulator
Seals
Bearings').
    *   `{operating_environment_description}`: Details of operational context (e.g.
 'Automotive under-hood
 -40C to 120C
 high vibration
 exposure to fuel/oil'; 'Aerospace
 high cycle fatigue
 wide temperature range
 safety-critical').

**2. FMEA Table Generation Logic**: For each key component in `{key_components_list_csv}` (or for the subsystem as a whole
 focusing on its functions):
    *   **Identify Potential Failure Modes**: What are common ways this component or function can fail? (e.g.
 For a pump: 'Fails to deliver pressure'
 'Leaks'
 'Noisy operation'
 'Seizure'. For a motor: 'Fails to start'
 'Overheats'
 'Excessive vibration').
    *   **Identify Potential Causes**: For each failure mode
 list plausible causes (e.g.
 For pump 'Fails to deliver pressure': 'Impeller wear'
 'Motor failure'
 'Blocked inlet'
 'Internal leakage'). Consider material degradation
 wear and tear
 manufacturing defects
 operational errors
 environmental factors from `{operating_environment_description}`.
    *   **Identify Potential Effects**: For each failure mode
 what are the consequences on the subsystem
 the larger system
 and the end-user/environment? (e.g.
 For pump 'Fails to deliver pressure': 'Engine stalls (system effect)'
 'Vehicle stranded (end-user effect)'
 'Loss of mission (aerospace context)').
    *   **Current Controls (Prevention/Detection)**: Suggest typical preventative controls (design features
 manufacturing tests) or detection controls (sensors
 inspection methods) that might be in place. If none obvious
 state 'None Assumed' or 'To be determined'.
    *   **Assign Initial S-O-D Ratings (Severity
 Occurrence
 Detection)**: Use a 1-10 scale (10 being worst for S/O
 10 being worst/hardest for D). These are INITIAL ESTIMATES to be reviewed by the engineering team.
        *   Severity (S): Based on the worst potential effect.
        *   Occurrence (O): Likelihood of the cause occurring. Consider `{operating_environment_description}`.
        *   Detection (D): Likelihood of detecting the cause or failure mode before it has a major effect
 based on current controls.
    *   **Calculate RPN (Risk Priority Number)**: S x O x D.
    *   **Recommended Actions (Placeholder)**: Initially can be 'Investigate further'
 'Consider design change'
 'Improve detection method' or leave blank for team input.

**3. Output Format (CSV String)**:
    *   The CSV header MUST be: `Item_Or_Function
Potential_Failure_Mode
Potential_Effect_of_Failure
Severity_S
Potential_Cause_of_Failure
Occurrence_O
Current_Design_Controls_Prevention
Current_Design_Controls_Detection
Detection_D
RPN
Recommended_Actions`
    *   Each row will represent one failure mode.
    *   Example row snippet (conceptual):
    `Electric_Motor
Fails_to_start
Subsystem_inoperable
Engine_does_not_start
Vehicle_stranded
8
Open_circuit_in_winding
Corrosion_due_to_environment
4
Visual_inspection_at_assembly
None_during_operation
7
224
Review_winding_protection
Consider_sealed_unit`

**IMPORTANT**: This FMEA is a STARTER TEMPLATE. The AI should populate it with plausible
 common mechanical failure scenarios. The ratings are subjective and for initial discussion by the engineering team. Emphasize that this output needs thorough review and validation by experts familiar with the specific design.
							

Prompt AI per Manufacturing Cell Hazard Identification

Identifies potential safety hazards in a new or modified manufacturing cell layout based on its description processes and human interaction points. This helps in proactively addressing safety concerns during the design phase. Output is a categorized markdown list.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Manufacturing Safety Engineer.
Your TASK is to identify potential safety hazards for a new or modified manufacturing cell
 based on the `{cell_layout_description}`
 the `{processes_involved_list_csv}`
 and the specified `{human_interaction_points_text}`.
You should categorize hazards for clarity.

**1. Input Analysis**:
    *   `{cell_layout_description}`: A textual description of the cell's physical layout
 including major equipment (e.g.
 'Robotic arm'
 'CNC machine'
 'Conveyor belt'
 'Assembly station'
 'Parts bins')
 and their relative positions. If it's from a sketch
 user describes the sketch.
    *   `{processes_involved_list_csv}`: CSV string listing the manufacturing processes occurring within the cell (e.g.
 'Welding
Material_handling
Machining
Automated_inspection
Manual_assembly').
    *   `{human_interaction_points_text}`: Description of where
 when
 and how human operators interact with the cell (e.g.
 'Loading raw materials at Station A'
 'Unloading finished parts from conveyor at Station B'
 'Performing maintenance on CNC machine'
 'Clearing jams in robot gripper'
 'Supervising automated processes').

**2. Hazard Identification Methodology**: Based on the inputs
 systematically consider different types of hazards. For each identified hazard
 briefly note its potential consequence.
    *   **Mechanical Hazards**: From moving parts
 robots
 machinery.
        *   Crushing
 shearing
 cutting
 entanglement
 impact (e.g.
 robot arm movement
 machine tool operation
 conveyor pinch points
 falling objects).
    *   **Electrical Hazards**: From power supplies
 wiring
 control panels.
        *   Shock
 burns
 arc flash.
    *   **Thermal Hazards**: From hot processes or components.
        *   Burns from welding
 heated tooling
 hot parts.
    *   **Ergonomic Hazards**: From workstation design
 manual handling
 repetitive tasks at `{human_interaction_points_text}`.
        *   Musculoskeletal disorders
 strain.
    *   **Process-Specific Hazards**: Related to the `{processes_involved_list_csv}`.
        *   Welding: Fumes
 UV radiation
 fire.
        *   Machining: Flying chips
 coolant exposure
 tool breakage.
        *   Material Handling: Dropped loads
 collisions with automated guided vehicles (if any).
    *   **Automation-Related Hazards**: Especially concerning robotics or automated machinery.
        *   Unexpected robot movement
 programming errors
 sensor failures leading to incorrect actions
 trapping points between robot and fixed structures.
    *   **Trip
 Slip
 and Fall Hazards**: From cables
 spills
 uneven surfaces within the cell layout.
    *   **Chemical Hazards (if applicable)**: From coolants
 lubricants
 cleaning agents
 process byproducts.
    *   **Noise Hazards**: From machinery
 pneumatic systems.

**3. Output Format (Markdown)**:
    *   **Title**: Potential Safety Hazards for Manufacturing Cell: `{cell_layout_description (brief title form)}`
    *   **Introduction**: Briefly state the purpose of the hazard identification.
    *   **Hazard Categories (use H3 or H4 headings for each category below)**:
        *   **Mechanical Hazards**
            *   `- [Hazard 1]: Brief description
 e.g.
 Robot arm collision with operator at loading station. Potential Consequence: Impact injury
 crushing.`
            *   `- [Hazard 2]: ...`
        *   **Electrical Hazards**
            *   `- [Hazard 1]: ...`
        *   **Thermal Hazards**
            *   `- [Hazard 1]: ...`
        *   **(And so on for all relevant categories listed in step 2)**
    *   **Specific Considerations for Human Interaction Points**:
        *   Highlight hazards particularly relevant at the points mentioned in `{human_interaction_points_text}`.
    *   **General Recommendations (Brief)**:
        *   Suggest general next steps
 e.g.
 'Conduct detailed risk assessment for each identified hazard.'
 'Consider hierarchy of controls (elimination
 substitution
 engineering controls
 administrative
 PPE).'

**IMPORTANT**: The list should be comprehensive but focused on PLAUSIBLE hazards given the inputs. The AI is not performing a full risk assessment
 just identifying potential hazards for further investigation. Encourage a systematic approach.
							

Prompt AI per Mitigation Strategies for Vibration Failures

Suggests and elaborates on potential mitigation strategies for vibration-induced failures in specified mechanical equipment given a summary of vibration data and any current attempts. This helps engineers find solutions to improve reliability. Output is a markdown list.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Vibration Analysis and Reliability Engineering Consultant.
Your TASK is to propose and elaborate on potential mitigation strategies for vibration-induced failures in the `{equipment_description_text}`
 considering the `{vibration_data_summary_text}` and any `{current_mitigation_attempts_text}`.
You should suggest a range of solutions
 from simple to more complex.

**1. Input Analysis**:
    *   `{equipment_description_text}`: Description of the affected equipment and its function (e.g.
 'Centrifugal pump
 Model XYZ
 used for cooling water circulation'
 'Large industrial fan mounted on steel frame'
 'Pipeline section experiencing flow-induced vibration').
    *   `{vibration_data_summary_text}`: Key characteristics of the problematic vibration (e.g.
 'High amplitude at 1x rotational speed (unbalance)'
 'Dominant frequency matches nearby machine's operating speed (external source)'
 'Broadband random vibration with peaks near structural resonances'
 'Flow-induced vibration at 50-60 Hz'). Include specific frequencies and amplitudes if known.
    *   `{current_mitigation_attempts_text}`: What
 if anything
 has already been tried and its outcome (e.g.
 'Attempted balancing
 reduced vibration by 20% but still too high'
 'Added stiffeners to frame
 shifted resonance but problem persists at new frequency'
 'None attempted yet').

**2. Mitigation Strategy Brainstorming & Elaboration**: Based on the inputs
 propose several distinct strategies. For each strategy:
    *   **Strategy Name/Type**: (e.g.
 Source Modification
 Path Interruption
 System Modification
 Damping Treatment).
    *   **Specific Action(s)**: Detail the concrete steps or changes involved.
    *   **Principle of Operation**: Explain HOW this strategy reduces vibration or its effects in the context of the `{vibration_data_summary_text}`.
    *   **Applicability/Suitability**: How well does this strategy address the likely root cause suggested by the vibration data? (e.g.
 If unbalance is indicated
 balancing is highly applicable).
    *   **Potential Pros**: Advantages of this approach.
    *   **Potential Cons/Challenges**: Disadvantages
 cost
 complexity
 potential side effects.
    *   **Consideration given `{current_mitigation_attempts_text}`**: How does this build upon or differ from what was already tried?

    **Categories of Strategies to Consider (examples
 tailor to the problem)**:
    *   **Source Treatment**:
        *   Balancing (for rotating machinery).
        *   Alignment (for coupled machines).
        *   Modifying operating speed to avoid resonance.
        *   Reducing fluid flow velocity or changing flow path (for FIV).
    *   **Path Treatment**:
        *   Isolation: Using resilient mounts (elastomeric
 spring isolators) to decouple the source from the receiver.
        *   Barriers: Enclosures for noise/vibration.
    *   **System Response Modification**:
        *   Stiffening: Adding braces or gussets to shift natural frequencies away from excitation frequencies.
        *   Mass Addition: Adding mass to shift natural frequencies.
        *   Damping: 
            *   Applied Damping Treatments (e.g.
 viscoelastic layers
 constrained layer damping).
            *   Tuned Mass Dampers (TMDs) for specific problematic frequencies.
        *   Active Vibration Control (more complex
 using sensors
 actuators
 and controllers).

**3. Output Format (Markdown)**:
    *   **Title**: Vibration Mitigation Strategies for `{equipment_description_text}`.
    *   **1. Summary of Vibration Problem**: Briefly restate the core issue based on inputs.
    *   **2. Proposed Mitigation Strategies**: For each strategy:
        *   `### Strategy X: [Strategy Name/Type]`
            *   `**Specific Actions:**`
            *   `**Principle of Operation:**`
            *   `**Applicability/Suitability:**`
            *   `**Potential Pros:**`
            *   `**Potential Cons/Challenges:**`
            *   `**Relation to Previous Attempts:**`
    *   **3. General Recommendations & Next Steps**: Suggest a logical approach to selecting and implementing strategies (e.g.
 'Start with source treatment if possible'
 'Consider simulation or modal analysis to predict effectiveness of structural modifications'
 'Implement incrementally and monitor results').

**IMPORTANT**: The strategies should be technically sound and relevant to the described problem. The AI should aim to provide a range of options suitable for different levels of complexity and cost.
							

Prompt AI per Machine Design Safety Compliance Check

Evaluates a machine design’s features against user-provided snippets of relevant safety standard clauses to identify potential non-compliance areas. This aids in designing safer machinery from the outset. Output is a markdown checklist.

Uscita: 

				
					Act as a Machinery Safety Specialist with expertise in CE Marking/OSHA compliance (or general machinery safety principles).
Your TASK is to perform a preliminary safety compliance check of the described `{machine_design_features_description_text}` against the provided `{safety_standard_clauses_text}`. Consider the general safety expectations for the `{country_of_operation_for_context}` if it influences interpretation (e.g. EU vs USA).

**1. Input Analysis**:
    *   `{machine_design_features_description_text}`: A textual description of the machine's key design features
 safety components (guards
 E-stops
 interlocks)
 operational modes
 and human interaction points.
    *   `{safety_standard_clauses_text}`: Text containing specific clauses or requirements excerpted from relevant safety standard(s) (e.g.
 snippets from ISO 12100
 ISO 13849-1
 IEC 60204-1
 or specific Type-C standards). The user provides these excerpts.
    *   `{country_of_operation_for_context}`: The intended country or region of operation (e.g.
 'European Union'
 'USA'
 'China')
 as general safety philosophies can differ.

**2. Compliance Check Methodology**: For EACH provided clause in `{safety_standard_clauses_text}`:
    *   **Understand Clause Requirement**: Interpret the main safety objective or requirement of the clause.
    *   **Compare with Design Features**: Assess the `{machine_design_features_description_text}` against this specific requirement.
        *   Does the design appear to meet the requirement?
        *   Are there features that clearly violate or contradict the requirement?
        *   Is there insufficient information in the design description to make a judgment?
    *   **Identify Potential Gaps or Non-Compliances**: Clearly state where the design may fall short.
    *   **Suggest Areas for Improvement or Verification**: What specific aspects of the design should be reviewed
 modified
 or further documented to ensure compliance with this clause?

**3. Output Format (Markdown)**:
    *   **Title**: Preliminary Safety Compliance Check: [Machine Name/Type from description] vs. Provided Standard Clauses.
    *   **Context**: Machine intended for operation in: `{country_of_operation_for_context}`.
    *   **Compliance Checklist**: For each clause provided by the user:
        *   `---`
        *   `**Clause Reference:** [Quote or clearly reference the clause from {safety_standard_clauses_text}]`
        *   `**Clause Summary/Objective:** [Your brief interpretation of what the clause aims to achieve]`
        *   `**Assessment against Machine Design ({machine_design_features_description_text}):**`
            *   `  - **Compliance Status:** [Compliant / Potentially Non-Compliant / Insufficient Information / Partially Compliant]`
            *   `  - **Observations/Reasoning:** [Explain your assessment based on the design features. Be specific.]`
            *   `  - **Potential Gaps Identified (if any):**`
                *   `    - Gap 1: ...`
                *   `    - Gap 2: ...`
            *   `  - **Recommendations/Questions for Design Team:**`
                *   `    - Recommendation 1: e.g.
 'Verify guard opening sizes against EN ISO 13857 for this hazard zone.'`
                *   `    - Question 1: e.g.
 'Is the emergency stop a Category 0 or Category 1 stop as per IEC 60204-1?'`
    *   `---`
    *   **Overall Disclaimer**: `This is a preliminary assessment based SOLELY on the provided design description and standard excerpts. A full compliance assessment requires a detailed review of the complete machine
 its documentation
 a full risk assessment
 and consultation of the complete unabridged standards.`

**IMPORTANT**: The AI is NOT certifying compliance. It is identifying potential areas of concern or questions based on a limited comparison. The assessment should be objective and constructive
 aiming to help the design team improve safety. If a clause is very complex or requires deep domain-specific knowledge not available
 it's okay to state that a specialist review is needed for that point.
							

Prompt AI per Valutazione del rischio etico per i progetti meccanici

Questa richiesta guida l'IA ad analizzare i rischi etici e le conseguenze sociali di uno specifico progetto di ingegneria meccanica, considerando i fattori di impatto ambientale, di sicurezza e sociale. Richiede una descrizione dettagliata del progetto e dell'applicazione prevista per fornire una valutazione strutturata dei rischi etici con raccomandazioni per le misure di mitigazione.

Uscita: 

				
					Analyze the following mechanical engineering project for potential ethical risks and societal consequences. The project description is: {project_description}. The intended application is: {intended_application}. Please provide a detailed ethical risk assessment that includes: 1) Identification of possible environmental impacts 2) Safety concerns for users and communities 3) Social and economic consequences 4) Recommendations for mitigating identified risks. Format your response using clear headings and bullet points for each section. Capitalize important keywords and use markdown for readability.
							

Prompt AI per Generatore di rapporti di sostenibilità e impatto ambientale

Questo prompt richiede all'IA di generare un rapporto completo sulla sostenibilità e sull'impatto ambientale per una determinata tecnologia o processo di ingegneria meccanica, considerando l'analisi del ciclo di vita, i materiali utilizzati e il consumo energetico. L'utente inserisce il nome della tecnologia e i parametri chiave.

Uscita: 

				
					Generate a detailed sustainability and environmental impact report for the mechanical engineering technology named {technology_name}. Use the following key parameters to guide your analysis: {key_parameters}. Include sections on: 1) Lifecycle environmental impact including raw materials sourcing and disposal 2) Energy consumption and efficiency 3) Potential for recycling or reuse 4) Recommendations for improving sustainability. Use markdown formatting with headings, bullet points, and bold important terms for clarity.
							

Prompt AI per Analisi delle implicazioni politiche per le innovazioni meccaniche

Questa richiesta istruisce l'intelligenza artificiale a valutare le implicazioni politiche e normative dell'impiego di una nuova innovazione di ingegneria meccanica. L'utente fornisce la descrizione dell'innovazione e la regione o il Paese di destinazione per adattare l'analisi alla legislazione e agli standard pertinenti.

Uscita: 

				
					Evaluate the policy and regulatory implications of the following mechanical engineering innovation: {innovation_description}. Focus your analysis on the target region or country: {target_region}. Outline existing regulations, standards, and compliance requirements that could affect deployment. Provide recommendations on policy adaptation or lobbying strategies to facilitate innovation adoption. Use numbered lists and clear subheadings to organize your response.
							
Sommario
    Añadir una cabecera para empezar a generar el índice

    SFIDA DI DESIGN o DI PROGETTO?
    Ingegnere meccanico, responsabile di progetto o di ricerca e sviluppo
    Sviluppo efficace del prodotto

    Disponibile per una nuova sfida con breve preavviso in Francia e Svizzera.
    Contattami su LinkedIn
    Prodotti in plastica e metallo, Design-to-cost, Ergonomia, Volume medio-alto, Settori regolamentati, CE e FDA, CAD, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, ISO 13485 Classe II e III

    Stiamo cercando un nuovo sponsor

     

    La vostra azienda o istituzione si occupa di tecnica, scienza o ricerca?
    > inviaci un messaggio <

    Ricevi tutti i nuovi articoli
    Gratuito, no spam, email non distribuita né rivenduta

    oppure puoi ottenere la tua iscrizione completa -gratuitamente- per accedere a tutti i contenuti riservati >Qui<

    Argomenti trattati: test, convalida, input dell'utente, raccolta dati, meccanismo di feedback, test interattivi, progettazione di indagini, test di usabilità, valutazione del software, progettazione sperimentale, valutazione delle prestazioni, questionario, ISO 9241, ISO 25010, ISO 20282, ISO 13407 e ISO 26362.

    1. Wynter

      Stiamo dando per scontato che l'IA possa sempre generare i migliori prompt in ingegneria meccanica? Come vengono generati?

    2. Giselle

      L'intelligenza artificiale renderà superflui gli ingegneri umani?

    Lascia un commento

    Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

    Post correlati

    Torna in alto

    Potrebbe anche piacerti