系统 可用性 系统可用性量表 (SUS) 是一种广泛使用且可靠的 10 项问卷,用于评估感知可用性。用户使用 5 点李克特量表对每个陈述进行评分。然后将回答转换为 0 到 100 之间的单一分数。尽管它很简单,但它能够从用户的主观角度快速而有效地衡量系统的整体可用性。

(图片仅供参考)
系统 可用性 系统可用性量表 (SUS) 是一种广泛使用且可靠的 10 项问卷,用于评估感知可用性。用户使用 5 点李克特量表对每个陈述进行评分。然后将回答转换为 0 到 100 之间的单一分数。尽管它很简单,但它能够从用户的主观角度快速而有效地衡量系统的整体可用性。
The System Usability Scale (SUS) was developed by John Brooke in 1986 as a “quick and dirty” tool for usability practitioners. It consists of ten statements, five worded positively (e.g., “I thought the system was easy to use”) and five worded negatively (e.g., “I found the system unnecessarily complex”). This alternating tone helps prevent acquiescence bias. Users respond using a 5-point scale from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree.” The scoring is slightly complex: for positive items, subtract 1 from the scale position; for negative items, subtract the scale position from 5. This results in all values ranging from 0 to 4. The sum of these values is then multiplied by 2.5 to obtain the final SUS score, which ranges from 0 to 100. It’s important to note that this is not a percentage; it’s a percentile score. A score of 68 is considered average. Despite its brevity, research has shown SUS to be reliable and valid across a wide range of interfaces, from hardware to software and websites. Its major advantages are that it is technology-agnostic, easy to administer, and provides a single score that is easy to communicate to stakeholders. It is often used after a usability test to capture the user’s overall impression of the system they just used.
系统可用性量表(SUS)
(如果日期未知或不相关,例如“流体力学”,则提供其显著出现的近似估计)
只有注册会员才能免费获取完整尺寸的图片和下载内容。
> 登录 <