Formal meetings or checkpoints in a project where a design is presented to stakeholders for feedback and approval.
- Metodologie: Ingegneria, Qualità
Recensioni sul design

Recensioni sul design
- Miglioramento continuo, Valutazione del progetto, Processo di progettazione, Revisione del design, Convalida del progetto, Gestione del progetto, Garanzia di qualità, Controllo di qualità
Obiettivo:
Come si usa:
- These are milestones in the development process where engineers, managers, and other stakeholders evaluate a design against its requirements to identify problems, ensure feasibility, and get buy-in before proceeding to the next phase.
Professionisti
- Helps to identify design flaws early, saving time and money; ensures all stakeholders are aligned and informed; provides a structured process for design approval.
Contro
- Can become bureaucratic 'gate-keeping' exercises if not managed well; can stifle creativity if the feedback is overly critical or prescriptive.
Categorie:
- Ingegneria, Progettazione del prodotto, Gestione del progetto, Qualità
Ideale per:
- Formally evaluating a design at key milestones to ensure it meets requirements and to get approval from all stakeholders.
Recensioni sul design take place in various sectors such as automotive, aerospace, consumer electronics, and medical devices, where rigorous adherence to specifications and safety standards is paramount. These reviews typically occur at the completion of each design phase, including conceptual design, preliminary design, and detailed design stages, allowing teams to assess functionality, manufacturability, and compliance with industry regulations. The participants include cross-functional team members such as engineers, product managers, quality assurance professionals, and sometimes end-users or clients for feedback. Involving diverse perspectives during these evaluations can foster collaboration and innovation, as different stakeholders bring unique requirements and constraints to the table. Techniques such as rigorous checklists, simulation testing, and prototype evaluations are often incorporated into the review process, allowing for data-driven discussions. Conducting these reviews regularly aids in maintaining project timelines and budgets, as issues can be identified and addressed promptly, preventing costly fixes later in the development process. Furthermore, this structured approach not only provides transparency and accountability but also enhances communication among team members, ensuring that everyone is aligned with the project goals and expectations.
Fasi chiave di questa metodologia
- Set clear objectives for the review meeting.
- Present the design against requirements and specifications.
- Facilitate discussions to assess design feasibility and alignment.
- Identify and document potential risks and issues.
- Solicit feedback from all stakeholders.
- Reach a consensus on the design status and next steps.
- Apply agreed-upon changes and adjustments to the design.
- Confirm approval to proceed to the next development phase.
Suggerimenti per i professionisti
- Implement a structured checklist that aligns with specific design criteria to ensure all aspects are covered consistently during reviews.
- Encourage a culture of constructive feedback by training all stakeholders in providing actionable critiques rather than broad opinions.
- Utilize performance metrics from previous reviews to inform decisions and adjust methodologies, enhancing the effectiveness of future evaluations.
Leggere e confrontare diverse metodologie, raccomandiamo il
> Ampio archivio di metodologie <
insieme ad altre 400 metodologie.
I vostri commenti su questa metodologia o ulteriori informazioni sono benvenuti su sezione commenti qui sotto ↓ , così come tutte le idee o i link relativi all'ingegneria.
Post correlati
Calcolatore da METS a calorie
Meta-analisi
Mappatura dei messaggi
Diagrammi del modello mentale
Forze di spinta e di trazione massime accettabili
Pianificazione dei fabbisogni di materiale (MRP)