Technique du groupe nominal

Technique du groupe nominal

Technique du groupe nominal

Objectif :

Générer et hiérarchiser des idées ou des solutions au sein d'un groupe d'une manière structurée qui encourage une participation égale.

Comment il est utilisé :

Avantages

Inconvénients

Catégories :

Idéal pour :

Nominal Group Technique (NGT) finds utility across various industries such as healthcare, technology, education, and product design, particularly during the early phases of innovation and project development when teams seek to harness diverse perspectives and prioritize concepts. This structured approach can be particularly beneficial during brainstorming sessions held to identify new products, features, or improvements to existing offerings. Participants, typically comprising a cross-functional team including engineers, designers, market analysts, and stakeholders, engage in a round-robin format which serves to level the playing field, ensuring that quieter members have an opportunity to voice their ideas without being overshadowed by more dominant personalities. The emphasis on anonymity in the initial idea generation phase minimizes peer pressure, allowing for a broader range of thoughts that might otherwise remain hidden in traditional brainstorming settings. Following the sharing of ideas, the subsequent discussion phase allows participants to seek clarification, build upon suggestions, and refine their understanding before voting on the proposed solutions, which leads to the identification of those with the highest consensus among the group. This technique not only promotes collaboration but also results in actionable outcomes that have been synthesized from group input, making it suitable for complex défis en matière de conception where stakeholder buy-in is critical to the success of the project. Furthermore, NGT can be effectively employed in strategic planning sessions and focus groups, facilitating a democratic process that prioritizes ideas based on collective agreement, thereby paving the way for innovative breakthroughs in product development and organizational strategy.

Principales étapes de cette méthodologie

  1. Participants generate ideas individually in writing.
  2. Ideas are shared one by one in a round-robin format.
  3. Each idea is discussed and clarified by the group.
  4. Participants individually rank or vote on the ideas.
  5. The rankings are tallied to prioritize ideas.

Conseils de pro

  • Encourage participants to draft multiple ideas initially, as this can stimulate deeper thinking and prevent fixation on a single concept during discussion.
  • Use anonymous voting methods for ranking to minimize bias and influence from dominant personalities, leading to more honest feedback.
  • Implement time limits for each stage—idea generation, discussion, and voting—to maintain a dynamic pace and maximize engagement from all participants.

Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le

> Référentiel méthodologique étendu  <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.

Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Articles Similaires

Retour en haut