Critical Incident Technique

Critical Incident Technique

Critical Incident Technique

Objectif :

A qualitative research méthode that involves collecting detailed information about significant real-world événements (incidents) from observers or participants.

Comment il est utilisé :

Avantages

Inconvénients

Catégories :

Idéal pour :

The Critical Incident Technique (CIT) is particularly adaptable in user experience research, usability testing, and workplace productivity evaluations across various sectors, including healthcare, education, software development, and customer service. The methodology is often employed during early project phases to inform design decisions or during iterative testing stages to refine existing systems. Typically, the initiation of CIT can be spearheaded by user experience researchers, product designers, or human factors engineers who seek to gather detailed qualitative data directly from users or employees. Participants in this methodology are primarily users of the product or system in question, as well as employees who interact with the process, offering authentic insights into their experiences. An example application in the healthcare sector could involve interviewing nurses about critical incidents they encountered while using Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems, which can reveal pivotal factors that either enhance or undermine patient care due to usability issues. By documenting both positive and negative incidents, teams can establish a clear understanding of systemic barriers and successful strategies that lead to improved user interactions, thus laying a foundation for targeted design improvements and training initiatives. The real-world rich data achieved through CIT allows organizations to make informed decisions grounded in actual user experiences rather than assumptions or generalized feedback.

Principales étapes de cette méthodologie

  1. Identify specific tasks or interactions to investigate.
  2. Prompt users or employees to recall significant incidents related to those tasks.
  3. Encourage elaboration on the context of each incident.
  4. Ask for details about the outcomes and consequences of the incidents.
  5. Explore the user's feelings and thoughts during the incident.
  6. Request clarification on what contributed to the success or failure in the situation.
  7. Analyze the collected incidents for common themes and patterns.
  8. Prioritize identified factors based on their impact on user experience.

Conseils de pro

  • Leverage follow-up probing questions to delve deeper into the emotional and situational context of reported incidents, enriching the understanding of user motivations and reactions.
  • Utilize thematic analysis on collected incidents to uncover underlying patterns and trends that can inform both design choices and training interventions.
  • Incorporate multi-modal data sources (e.g., observational data, task analysis) alongside incident interviews to validate findings and uncover discrepancies between perceived and actual user experiences.

Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le

> Référentiel méthodologique étendu  <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.

Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Articles Similaires

Retour en haut