Critical Incident Technique

Critical Incident Technique

Critical Incident Technique

Zielsetzung:

A qualitative research Verfahren that involves collecting detailed information about significant real-world Veranstaltungen (incidents) from observers or participants.

Wie es verwendet wird:

Vorteile

Nachteile

Kategorien:

Am besten geeignet für:

The Critical Incident Technique (CIT) is particularly adaptable in user experience research, usability testing, and workplace productivity evaluations across various sectors, including healthcare, education, software development, and customer service. The methodology is often employed during early project phases to inform design decisions or during iterative testing stages to refine existing systems. Typically, the initiation of CIT can be spearheaded by user experience researchers, product designers, or human factors engineers who seek to gather detailed qualitative data directly from users or employees. Participants in this methodology are primarily users of the product or system in question, as well as employees who interact with the process, offering authentic insights into their experiences. An example application in the healthcare sector could involve interviewing nurses about critical incidents they encountered while using Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems, which can reveal pivotal factors that either enhance or undermine patient care due to usability issues. By documenting both positive and negative incidents, teams can establish a clear understanding of systemic barriers and successful strategies that lead to improved user interactions, thus laying a foundation for targeted design improvements and training initiatives. The real-world rich data achieved through CIT allows organizations to make informed decisions grounded in actual user experiences rather than assumptions or generalized feedback.

Die wichtigsten Schritte dieser Methodik

  1. Identify specific tasks or interactions to investigate.
  2. Prompt users or employees to recall significant incidents related to those tasks.
  3. Encourage elaboration on the context of each incident.
  4. Ask for details about the outcomes and consequences of the incidents.
  5. Explore the user's feelings and thoughts during the incident.
  6. Request clarification on what contributed to the success or failure in the situation.
  7. Analyze the collected incidents for common themes and patterns.
  8. Prioritize identified factors based on their impact on user experience.

Profi-Tipps

  • Leverage follow-up probing questions to delve deeper into the emotional and situational context of reported incidents, enriching the understanding of user motivations and reactions.
  • Utilize thematic analysis on collected incidents to uncover underlying patterns and trends that can inform both design choices and training interventions.
  • Incorporate multi-modal data sources (e.g., observational data, task analysis) alongside incident interviews to validate findings and uncover discrepancies between perceived and actual user experiences.

Verschiedene Methoden lesen und vergleichen, Wir empfehlen die

> Umfassendes Methoden-Repository  <
zusammen mit den über 400 anderen Methoden.

Ihre Kommentare zu dieser Methodik oder zusätzliche Informationen sind willkommen auf der Kommentarbereich unten ↓ , sowie alle ingenieursbezogenen Ideen oder Links.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Verwandte Artikel

Nach oben scrollen