Verification and validation (V&V) are distinct processes. Verification ensures a product meets its specified requirements (“Are you building it right?”). Validation ensures the product meets the user’s actual needs and intended use (“Are you building the right thing?”). They are complementary activities within quality management, often performed sequentially or in parallel to ensure both correctness and usefulness.
Verification vs. Validation
- Barry Boehm
The distinction between verification and validation is fundamental to quality assurance in any complex engineering discipline, particularly software and systems engineering. Verification is an internal quality process focused on compliance with specifications. It involves activities like reviews, inspections, and walkthroughs of design documents, code, and requirements. The goal is to find defects early in the development lifecycle. For example, a code review verifies that the software adheres to coding standards and correctly implements a specific algorithm as described in a design document.
Validation, on the other hand, is an external quality process focused on fitness for purpose. It assesses whether the final product is effective in the operational environment for which it was intended. This typically involves testing the product with actual users or in a simulated real-world environment. For instance, user acceptance testing (UAT) is a validation activity where end-users test the software to see if it helps them perform their tasks efficiently and effectively. A system can be perfectly verified—meaning it has no bugs and meets all documented specifications—but still fail validation if those specifications were flawed or did not accurately capture the user’s true needs.
Barry Boehm’s work emphasized that these two activities answer different questions and are crucial for delivering a successful product. Neglecting verification leads to a buggy, unreliable product, while neglecting validation leads to a product that, while technically sound, is ultimately useless to its intended audience. The two processes work in tandem to ensure both correctness and usefulness.
Typ
Disruption
Verwendung
Precursors
- early concepts of quality control in manufacturing
- formal logic and proof theory
- structured programming principles
- early software testing methodologies
Anwendungen
- agile software development methodologies
- systems engineering lifecycle models (e.g., v-model)
- pharmaceutical drug development protocols
- aerospace systems certification (e.g., DO-178C)
- medical device approval processes (e.g., FDA regulations)
Patente:
Potential Innovations Ideas
!Professionals (100% free) Mitgliedschaft erforderlich
Sie müssen ein Professionals (100% free) Mitglied sein, um auf diesen Inhalt zugreifen zu können.
VERFÜGBAR FÜR NEUE HERAUSFORDERUNGEN
Maschinenbauingenieur, Projekt- oder F&E-Manager
Kurzfristig für eine neue Herausforderung verfügbar.
Kontaktieren Sie mich auf LinkedIn
Integration von Kunststoff-Metall-Elektronik, Design-to-Cost, GMP, Ergonomie, Geräte und Verbrauchsmaterialien in mittleren bis hohen Stückzahlen, regulierte Branchen, CE und FDA, CAD, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, medizinische ISO 13485
Wir suchen einen neuen Sponsor
Ihr Unternehmen oder Ihre Institution beschäftigt sich mit Technik, Wissenschaft oder Forschung?
> Senden Sie uns eine Nachricht <
Erhalten Sie alle neuen Artikel
Kostenlos, kein Spam, E-Mail wird nicht verteilt oder weiterverkauft
oder Sie können eine kostenlose Vollmitgliedschaft erwerben, um auf alle eingeschränkten Inhalte zuzugreifen >Hier<
Historical Context
Verification vs. Validation
(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)
Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles