根据预先确定的标准和结构化的评分程序,系统地评估并从更大的创意或概念集合中选出最有前途的创意或概念。
- 方法: 工程, 产品设计, 项目管理
埃利托方法

埃利托方法
- 敏捷方法论, 持续改进, 设计思维, 创新, 精益制造, 多重标准决策制定(MCDM), 项目管理, 质量管理
目标
如何使用
- 由一组评估人员根据一套加权标准(如可行性、市场潜力、战略契合度)对每个创意进行单独或集体评分。分数汇总后对创意进行排序,便于决策。通常涉及成对比较或其他排序技术。
优点
- 提供一个结构化和透明的决策过程,有助于客观地比较各种不同的想法,促进小组达成共识,确保所选想法与战略目标相一致。
缺点
- 如果标准或权重界定不清,则可能具有主观性;可能会扼杀那些在传统指标上得分不高的新颖或非常规创意;对于大量创意或评估者来说,可能会耗费大量时间。
类别
- 构思, 解决问题, 项目管理, 风险管理
最适合:
- 以结构化和客观的方式对大量创意、概念或项目提案进行筛选和优先排序,尤其是在创新或项目选择的早期阶段。
The Elito Method is particularly valuable in environments where innovation is heavily emphasized, such as technology startups, research and development departments in large corporations, or academic institutions pursuing cutting-edge projects. This methodology is applicable during initial phases of product development or project evaluation, where numerous ideas need filtering to streamline focus on the most promising opportunities. Cross-functional teams, including product managers, engineers, marketers, and designers, should be involved in the scoring process to ensure a diverse range of perspectives is accounted for in the evaluation. Industries such as consumer electronics, pharmaceuticals, or sustainable energy frequently utilize such structured decision-making to navigate the uncertainty and risk inherent in early-stage initiatives. The ability to align selected ideas with strategic business objectives through the weighting of criteria, such as market potential or feasibility, assists organizations in maintaining focus on their long-term vision while addressing current market needs. The aggregation of scores and the use of pairwise comparisons enable teams to reach a consensus efficiently, minimizing bias and promoting an inclusive environment for idea selection. Consequently, stakeholders find it easier to advocate for the chosen projects, as the transparent nature of the methodology provides a clear rationale for decisions made based on collective evaluations.
该方法的关键步骤
- Define evaluation criteria based on strategic goals and project requirements.
- Assign weights to each criterion reflecting their importance in the decision-making process.
- Have evaluators individually score ideas against the criteria using a consistent scoring system.
- Aggregate individual scores to form a collective score for each idea.
- Utilize pairwise comparison or ranking techniques to facilitate further analysis and discussion.
- Rank ideas based on aggregated scores to identify top candidates for selection.
- Facilitate group discussion to reach consensus on final selections and justifications.
专业提示
- Incorporate a dynamic scoring system that allows for real-time adjustments based on stakeholder feedback and market changes.
- Utilize scoring calibration sessions among evaluators to ensure alignment on how criteria are interpreted and applied.
- Implement a feedback loop post-evaluation to assess the predictive validity of the scoring outcomes against actual project performance.
相关文章
肌肉骨骼不适调查表
多变量测试(MVT)
多元回归分析
动作捕捉系统
MoSCoW 方法
情绪中值测试