» Verification vs. Validation

Verification vs. Validation

1980
  • Barry Boehm

Verification and validation (V&V) are distinct processes. Verification ensures a product meets its specified requirements (“Are you building it right?”). Validation ensures the product meets the user’s actual needs and intended use (“Are you building the right thing?”). They are complementary activities within quality management, often performed sequentially or in parallel to ensure both correctness and usefulness.

The distinction between 验证验证 is fundamental to quality assurance in any complex engineering discipline, particularly software and systems engineering. Verification is an internal quality process focused on compliance with specifications. It involves activities like reviews, inspections, and walkthroughs of design documents, code, and requirements. The goal is to find defects early in the development lifecycle. For example, a code review verifies that the software adheres to coding standards and correctly implements a specific algorithm as described in a design document.

Validation, on the other hand, is an external quality process focused on fitness for purpose. It assesses whether the final product is effective in the operational environment for which it was intended. This typically involves testing the product with actual users or in a simulated real-world environment. For instance, user acceptance testing (UAT) is a validation activity where end-users test the software to see if it helps them perform their tasks efficiently and effectively. A system can be perfectly verified—meaning it has no bugs and meets all documented specifications—but still fail validation if those specifications were flawed or did not accurately capture the user’s true needs.

Barry Boehm’s work emphasized that these two activities answer different questions and are crucial for delivering a successful product. Neglecting verification leads to a buggy, unreliable product, while neglecting validation leads to a product that, while technically sound, is ultimately useless to its intended audience. The two processes work in tandem to ensure both correctness and usefulness.

UNESCO Nomenclature: 1203
– Computer Science

类型

Abstract System

Disruption

Substantial

使用方法

Widespread Use

Precursors

  • early concepts of quality control in 制造业
  • formal logic and proof theory
  • structured programming principles
  • 软件 testing methodologies

应用

  • agile software development methodologies
  • systems engineering lifecycle models (e.g., v-model)
  • pharmaceutical drug development protocols
  • aerospace systems certification (e.g., DO-178C)
  • 医疗器械 approval processes (e.g., FDA 法规)

专利:

Potential Innovations Ideas

级别需要会员

您必须是!!等级!!会员才能访问此内容。

立即加入

已经是会员? 在此登录
Related to: verification, validation, quality assurance, software engineering, systems engineering, requirements, specification, testing

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

迎接新挑战
机械工程师、项目或研发经理
有效的产品开发

可在短时间内接受新的挑战。
通过 LinkedIn 联系我
塑料金属电子集成、成本设计、GMP、人体工程学、中高容量设备和耗材、受监管行业、CE 和 FDA、CAD、Solidworks、精益西格玛黑带、医疗 ISO 13485

我们正在寻找新的赞助商

 

您的公司或机构从事技术、科学或研究吗?
> 给我们发送消息 <

接收所有新文章
免费,无垃圾邮件,电子邮件不分发也不转售

或者您可以免费获得完整会员资格以访问所有受限制的内容>这里<

(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)

Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles

滚动至顶部

你可能还喜欢