Methodologies: Engineering, Product Design, Project Management

Cornell ROI Estimator

Cost Allocation, Ergonomics, Financial, Human Factors, Process Improvement, Productivity, Value Engineering (VE), Value Proposition

Cornell ROI Estimator

Cost Allocation, Ergonomics, Financial, Human Factors, Process Improvement, Productivity, Value Engineering (VE), Value Proposition

Objective:

A calculator designed to estimate the potential financial return on investment (ROI) from ergonomic interventions.

How it’s used:

The tool takes user inputs about the costs associated with a musculoskeletal disorder problem (e.g., lost workdays, medical costs) and the cost of an ergonomic solution, then calculates the potential savings and payback period.

Pros

Provides a financial justification for ergonomic improvements, helps to communicate the value of ergonomics to management in business terms, is simple to use.

Cons

The results are estimates based on the accuracy of the input data, may not capture all the intangible benefits of ergonomics (e.g., improved morale), can oversimplify complex financial situations.

Categories:

Economics, Ergonomics, Risk Management

Best for:

Making a business case for ergonomic investments by estimating their financial payback.

The Cornell ROI Estimator is particularly effective in various industries where manual labor or repetitive tasks are prevalent, such as manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics. It finds its application during the assessment phase of ergonomic interventions, serving as a vital tool for safety officers, ergonomists, and business managers who are looking to justify investments in workplace health improvements. Stakeholders involved in this process include human resources teams, financial analysts, and operational managers who collaborate to input relevant cost data, such as worker compensation payouts and associated medical expenses while ensuring a comprehensive view of potential returns. By quantifying the financial impact of ergonomic enhancements, organizations can compare the initial costs of interventions against projected savings from reduced injury rates, leading to quicker recovery of investment. This methodology provides a clear articulation of the economic benefits of ergonomics, enabling teams to construct persuasive arguments that resonate with executive leadership seeking data-driven decisions regarding employee welfare and productivity enhancements. When effectively employed, this tool can stimulate strategic discussions around workplace design modifications and encourage a culture of prioritizing employee health and safety by translating ergonomic initiatives into tangible financial outcomes.

Key steps of this methodology

Identify relevant costs associated with musculoskeletal disorders, including medical expenses and lost workdays.
Estimate the cost of implementing ergonomic solutions to address the identified issues.
Calculate potential savings from reduced lost workdays and medical costs after implementing ergonomic improvements.
Determine the payback period by comparing the cost of ergonomic solutions to the estimated savings.
Validate assumptions and inputs to ensure accuracy in savings and payback calculations.

Pro Tips

Incorporate industry benchmarks for MSD-related costs to enhance credibility and create a strong reference point for your financial estimates.
Utilize visual data representation tools like charts and graphs to effectively communicate ROI results to both technical and non-technical stakeholders.
Conduct post-implementation reviews to validate financial projections and adjust future ergonomic strategies based on real-world performance data.

To read and compare several methodologies, we recommend the

> Extensive Methodologies Repository <
together with the 400+ other methodologies.

Your comments on this methodology or additional info are welcome on the comment section below ↓ , so as any engineering-related ideas or links.