Methodologies: Engineering, Quality

Back-to-Back Testing

Agile Methodology, Continuous Improvement, Process Improvement, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Software Testing, Testing Methods, Validation

Back-to-Back Testing

Agile Methodology, Continuous Improvement, Process Improvement, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Software Testing, Testing Methods, Validation

Objective:

A type of testing that involves comparing the output of two or more versions of a system to check for consistency.

How it’s used:

Back-to-back testing is used to test for regressions in a system. By comparing the output of a new version of a system to the output of a previous version, you can check if the new version has introduced any new bugs.

Pros

Is an effective way to test for regressions, can be automated, and can be used to test a wide range of systems.

Cons

Can be difficult to set up, requires a stable baseline version of the system, and may not be suitable for all types of systems.

Categories:

Engineering, Quality

Best for:

Testing for regressions in a system by comparing the output of different versions.

Back-to-back testing is particularly beneficial in industries where software updates and system enhancements occur frequently, such as in software development, telecommunications, and financial services. This methodology can effectively be integrated during the development phase of a product lifecycle, especially before a significant release or rollout, enabling teams to mitigate risks associated with new code implementations. Participants typically include software engineers, quality assurance teams, and product managers who work collaboratively to define test cases and acceptable outcomes for both versions of the system. Industries that employ this testing approach often leverage automated testing frameworks, which enhance efficiency by reducing manual testing efforts and ensuring thorough coverage across various scenarios. The results from back-to-back testing provide valuable feedback that guides decision-making for future iterations, ensuring that new features do not adversely affect existing functionalities. It is not uncommon to see this approach employed in machine learning applications, where model outputs are compared, or in API updates, where different versions are evaluated for consistency in data responses. Additionally, organizations can maintain their competitive edge by adopting continuous integration and deployment practices, allowing them to release updates confidently, knowing that regression issues have been effectively identified and addressed through robust back-to-back testing methodologies.

Key steps of this methodology

Identify the key functionalities and metrics from the previous version to test against.
Execute the previous version of the system and capture its outputs for the identified metrics.
Run the new version of the system under the same conditions and capture its outputs for the same metrics.
Perform a direct comparison of the outputs from both versions.
Document any discrepancies or regressions found in the new version's outputs.
Analyze the root cause of any regressions and determine if they can be fixed.

Pro Tips

Employ version control to manage changes and clearly document output differences between system versions for precise regression tracking.
Incorporate statistical analysis to quantify differences in outputs, allowing for the identification of significant regressions beyond mere observation.
Implement a robust logging mechanism that captures comprehensive input and output data, ensuring that test conditions are repeatable and transparent.

To read and compare several methodologies, we recommend the

> Extensive Methodologies Repository <
together with the 400+ other methodologies.

Your comments on this methodology or additional info are welcome on the comment section below ↓ , so as any engineering-related ideas or links.