AET (Arbeitswissenschaftliches Erhebungsverfahren zur Tätigkeitsanalyse – Ergonomic Job Analysis)

AET Ergonomic Job Analysis

AET (Arbeitswissenschaftliches Erhebungsverfahren zur Tätigkeitsanalyse – Ergonomic Job Analysis)

Objective:

A comprehensive ergonomic job analysis method developed in Germany.

How it’s used:

Pros

Cons

Categories:

Best for:

AET is widely adapted in industries such as manufacturing, healthcare, and service sectors, where understanding work-related stressors can lead to significant improvements in job design and employee well-being. In manufacturing, for instance, AET applications can identify ergonomic stressors that lead to injuries, allowing companies to modify workstation designs or implement better lifting techniques. In healthcare settings, the methodology can analyze the demands placed on staff during high-pressure scenarios, helping organizations to redesign workflows and reduce burnout. It can also be employed in office environments to assess social-psychological factors affecting employee collaboration and morale. The procedure is typically initiated by occupational health professionals, ergonomists, or human resource departments who collaborate with employees and management to gather data using the standardized questionnaire. Participants may include frontline workers, team leaders, and safety officers who contribute their experiences and insights, ensuring the analysis reflects a comprehensive view of the work environment. AET findings can serve as the foundation for training programs, organizational changes, or policy developments aimed at enhancing worker satisfaction and productivity, making it a valuable asset during the assessment and post-implementation phases of workplace improvement projects.

Key steps of this methodology

  1. Identify the work activity or task to analyze.
  2. Select relevant ergonomic dimensions to evaluate.
  3. Utilize the standardized questionnaire to obtain qualitative and quantitative data.
  4. Assess physical work factors such as posture, repetitive motions, and lifting.
  5. Evaluate organizational factors including work schedules and job demands.
  6. Analyze social-psychological aspects like teamwork, communication, and stress.
  7. Integrate findings to identify stressors affecting performance and well-being.
  8. Develop recommendations for job design and improvements based on analysis.
  9. Implement changes and monitor their effectiveness over time.

Pro Tips

  • Utilize cross-functional teams to gather diverse input on the questionnaire design, ensuring it captures a full range of stressors across departments.
  • Implement iterative testing of the questionnaire in real-world settings, refining it based on feedback to improve its reliability and validity.
  • Incorporate advanced data analysis techniques, such as machine learning, to identify patterns in the data that traditional analysis might overlook, enhancing comprehension of stressor impacts.

To read and compare several methodologies, we recommend the

> Extensive Methodologies Repository  <
together with the 400+ other methodologies.

Your comments on this methodology or additional info are welcome on the comment section below ↓ , so as any engineering-related ideas or links.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Scroll to Top