A formal statistical study to determine if a measurement system is capable of providing reliable data by quantifying its accuracy, precision (repeatability and reproducibility), stability, and bias.
- Méthodologies : Ingénierie, Conception de Produits, Gestion de projet
Analyse des systèmes de mesure (MSA)

Analyse des systèmes de mesure (MSA)
- Capacité de traitement, Amélioration des processus, Assurance qualité, Contrôle de qualité, Gestion de la qualité, Six Sigma, Contrôle statistique des processus (CSP)
Objectif :
Comment il est utilisé :
- Utilizes tools such as Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (Gage R&R) studies, linearity studies, and stability studies. Multiple appraisers measure the same parts multiple times to isolate and quantify the sources of variation within the measurement system.
Avantages
- Provides confidence in data used for making critical decisions about product quality or contrôle des processus; Identifies sources of measurement error so they can be addressed; A key component of quality management systems like IATF 16949.
Inconvénients
- Requires careful planning and execution to ensure valid results; Can be resource-intensive, requiring trained personnel and dedicated time; Interpretation of results needs a good understanding of statistical concepts.
Catégories :
- Lean Sigma, Fabrication, Qualité
Idéal pour :
- Assessing the capability of measurement systems to provide trustworthy data for analysis, process control, and product acceptance.
Measurement System Analysis (MSA) serves as a foundational methodology emphasizing the verification of measurement tools and processes across various industries, including manufacturing, automotive, aerospace, and pharmaceuticals, where precision and accuracy are integral to quality assurance. MSA can be initiated during the design phase of a product lifecycle, allowing engineers and quality professionals to validate measurement tools before production begins. Various team members, including quality engineers, process engineers, and operations managers, collaborate in conducting Gage R&R studies, which evaluate both the repeatability and reproducibility of measurement systems by comparing results from multiple appraisers across duplicated measurements of the same parts. This methodological approach also encompasses linearity studies, which assess how measurement accuracy changes with respect to different values, and stability studies that monitor whether measurement precision is consistent over time when evaluating the same characteristic. By identifying and quantifying measurement errors, MSA not only instills trust in the data collected but also equips teams with the information needed to make informed decisions regarding process improvements and product finalization. Industries adhering to standards such as IATF 16949 benefit greatly as MSA aligns with quality management practices that seek to reduce variation and enhance customer satisfaction through reliable measurement processes. Regular implementation not only strengthens in-house capability but also establishes a framework for continuous improvement, ensuring that organizations can meet evolving regulatory requirements and market expectations.
Principales étapes de cette méthodologie
- Define the measurement system and its purpose.
- Select the measurement instruments and define their specifications.
- Organize multiple appraisers to conduct measurements independently.
- Ensure that test conditions are standardized across all measurements.
- Perform the Gage R&R study to analyze repeatability and reproducibility.
- Conduct linearity studies to assess measurement accuracy across the entire range.
- Execute stability studies to evaluate measurement consistency over time.
- Analyze the collected data to determine sources of variation.
- Implement corrective actions to address identified measurement errors.
- Document findings and update measurement system protocols as necessary.
Conseils de pro
- Conduct Gage R&R studies with diverse appraisers to capture both repeatability and reproducibility factors accurately, reducing bias from specific operator preferences.
- Implement a structured approach to linearity studies by evaluating multiple measurement ranges to ensure that the measurement system performs consistently across operational limits.
- Regularly perform stability studies over extended time frames, identifying trends or drift in measurement systems that could undermine data integrity.
Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le
> Référentiel méthodologique étendu <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.
Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.
Articles Similaires
Questionnaires sur les troubles musculo-squelettiques
Tests à plusieurs variables (MVT)
Analyse de régression multiple
Systèmes de capture de mouvement
Méthode MoSCoW
Test de la médiane de Mood