Decision Table Testing

Decision Table Testing

Decision Table Testing

Objectif :

A black-box logiciel testing technique used to test systems with complex business logic.

Comment il est utilisé :

Avantages

Inconvénients

Catégories :

Idéal pour :

Decision Table Testing is particularly beneficial in sectors such as finance, telecommunications, healthcare, and software development where intricate business rules govern transactions or processes. For instance, in the insurance industry, a decision table can encompass various factors, including customer age, policy type, and claim history, thereby allowing underwriters to clarify how different combinations affect premium calculations or claim approvals. This methodology is particularly effective during the testing phase of product development, where stakeholders such as business analysts, quality assurance testers, and software engineers collaborate to evaluate business logic implementation. By systematically listing input combinations with their expected results, teams can monitor and refine edge cases that might not surface during traditional testing. This aids in identifying not only gaps in logic but also overlaps, ensuring that business rules align with project specifications. Using tools like spreadsheets or specialized software can further enhance collaboration among team members, allowing for efficient updates to tables with increasing project complexity. Consequently, the visual nature of decision tables enhances communication clarity among team members and stakeholders, supporting better decision-making and accelerating the testing process without sacrificing thoroughness.

Principales étapes de cette méthodologie

  1. Identify input conditions relevant to the business rules.
  2. List all possible combinations of these input conditions.
  3. Define the expected actions or outcomes for each combination.
  4. Create a decision table that organizes input combinations and corresponding outcomes.
  5. Review the table for completeness and correctness against requirements.
  6. Execute test cases derived from the decision table.
  7. Analyze results to determine if actual outcomes match expected outcomes.
  8. Identify any missing combinations or discrepancies and adjust the table as needed.

Conseils de pro

  • Incorporate boundary analyse de la valeur into the decision table to validate edge cases that may not be covered by standard combinations.
  • Use automated tools to manage and generate decision tables, which can minimize errors and expedite the testing process over time.
  • Periodically review and revise decision tables as business rules evolve, ensuring they remain relevant and comprehensive against changing requirements.

Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le

> Référentiel méthodologique étendu  <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.

Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Articles Similaires

Retour en haut