A formal process for finding defects in documents and Software.
- Methodologien: Ideenfindung, Problemlösung
Fagan Inspection

Fagan Inspection
- Agile Methodik, Überprüfung des Designs, Prozessverbesserung, Prozess-Optimierung, Qualitätssicherung, Qualitätskontrolle, Qualitätsmanagement, Qualitätsmanagement-System (QMS), Software-Prüfung
Zielsetzung:
Wie es verwendet wird:
- A structured peer review process that involves defined roles, a set of steps (planning, overview, preparation, inspection, rework, and follow-up), and the use of checklists to identify defects in documents like requirements, design specifications, and code.
Vorteile
- Effective at finding defects early in the development process; Provides a structured and disciplined approach to review.
Nachteile
- Can be time-consuming and expensive to conduct; Requires trained participants and a formal process.
Kategorien:
- Maschinenbau, Qualität
Am besten geeignet für:
- Ensuring the quality of critical documents and code in a software project.
Fagan Inspection finds extensive applications in software engineering but is also beneficial across various industries including aerospace, automotive, telecommunications, and healthcare, particularly where product safety and adherence to regulations are paramount. This methodology clearly delineates roles such as the moderator, author, reviewers, and scribe, each contributing to a collaborative environment to ensure thorough analysis. The phased approach not only enhances document quality but also optimizes workflow, making it suitable for the early project stages, particularly during requirements gathering and design. An initial planning phase leads to an overview and preparation that sets the context for detailed inspection, where checklists guide reviewers in identifying discrepancies and omissions, ultimately resulting in actionable feedback for rework. Follow-up ensures that defects have been addressed, enabling iterative improvement. Practitioners typically include software engineers, quality assurance professionals, project managers, and subject matter experts, all of whom are encouraged to participate actively to foster an inclusive dialogue. Implementing Fagan Inspection within a project can significantly reduce costs and development time by preemptively addressing issues that might otherwise accumulate and escalate during later stages. In environments emphasizing due diligence and compliance, such as finance or pharmaceuticals, the robust nature of this methodology assures stakeholders that products will meet necessary standards before they reach the market.
Die wichtigsten Schritte dieser Methodik
- Conduct a planning meeting to outline inspection goals.
- Perform a walkthrough to familiarize participants with the material.
- Review the document or code according to the checklist.
- Identify defects and discuss findings among the team.
- Assign responsibility for rework of identified defects.
- Conduct a follow-up to ensure rework has been completed.
Profi-Tipps
- Involve stakeholders early in the Fagan Inspection process to clarify expectations and reduce misunderstandings.
- Utilize metrics from previous inspections to identify common defect types and improve checklist specificity.
- Encourage a culture of constructive feedback during inspections to enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing among team members.
Verschiedene Methoden lesen und vergleichen, Wir empfehlen die
> Umfassendes Methoden-Repository <
zusammen mit den über 400 anderen Methoden.
Ihre Kommentare zu dieser Methodik oder zusätzliche Informationen sind willkommen auf der Kommentarbereich unten ↓ , sowie alle ingenieursbezogenen Ideen oder Links.
Verwandte Artikel
Fragebögen zu muskuloskelettalen Beschwerden
Multivariate Tests (MVT)
Mehrfache Regressionsanalyse
Motion-Capture-Systeme
MoSCoW-Methode
Moods Median-Test