Formal Verification

The Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) condition is a necessary stability criterion for numerical solutions of hyperbolic partial differential equations using explicit time-integration schemes. It dictates that the time step size must be small enough that information does not travel further than one spatial grid cell per time step. For a 1D case, [latex]C = u \frac{\Delta t}{\Delta x} \le C_{max}[/latex], ensuring numerical stability.

The reliability function, R(t), defines the probability that a system or component will perform its required function without failure for a specified time 't'. For systems with a constant failure rate (λ), it is described by the exponential distribution: [latex]R(t) = e^{-\lambda t}[/latex]. This function is fundamental to predicting the longevity and performance of a product.

The Finite Volume Method (FVM) is a dominant numerical technique in CFD for solving partial differential equations. It discretizes the domain into a mesh of control volumes and applies the governing equations in their integral form to each volume. By converting volume integrals to surface integrals using the divergence theorem, it focuses on calculating the flux of conserved properties across cell faces.

A topological space is an ordered pair [latex](X, \tau)[/latex], where [latex]X[/latex] is a set and [latex]\tau[/latex] is a collection of subsets of [latex]X[/latex], called open sets, satisfying three axioms: 1) The empty set [latex]\emptyset[/latex] and [latex]X[/latex] itself are in [latex]\tau[/latex]. 2) The union of any number of sets in [latex]\tau[/latex] is also in [latex]\tau[/latex]. 3) The intersection of any finite number of sets in [latex]\tau[/latex] is also in [latex]\tau[/latex].

The Finite Element Method (FEM) is a powerful numerical technique for solving complex engineering and physics problems described by partial differential equations. It works by discretizing a continuous domain into a set of smaller, simpler subdomains called 'finite elements'. This allows for the approximate numerical solution of problems in structural analysis, heat transfer, fluid flow, and electromagnetism.

Verification techniques are broadly classified as static or dynamic. Static verification (or static analysis) examines the system's code or design without executing it. Examples include code reviews, inspections, and automated static analysis tools. Dynamic verification (or testing) involves executing the system with a set of inputs and observing its behavior to find defects. Both are complementary for comprehensive quality assurance.

Verification and validation (V&V) are distinct processes. Verification ensures a product meets its specified requirements ("Are you building it right?"). Validation ensures the product meets the user's actual needs and intended use ("Are you building the right thing?"). They are complementary activities within quality management, often performed sequentially or in parallel to ensure both correctness and usefulness.

The repeatability limit, [latex]r[/latex], is a critical value derived from the repeatability standard deviation ([latex]s_r[/latex]). It represents the maximum expected absolute difference between two single test results, obtained under repeatability conditions, with a 95% probability. It is commonly calculated as [latex]r = 2.8 \times s_r[/latex]. If the difference exceeds [latex]r[/latex], the results are considered suspect.