A formal process for finding defects in logiciel and documents.
- Méthodologies : Ingénierie, Conception de Produits, Gestion de projet
Formal Technical Reviews

Formal Technical Reviews
- Amélioration continue, Examen de la conception, Prévention des erreurs, Amélioration des processus, Assurance qualité, Contrôle de qualité, Gestion de la qualité, Système de gestion de la qualité (SGQ), Software Testing
Objectif :
Comment il est utilisé :
- A structured peer review process with defined roles and procedures for finding defects in software artifacts like code, designs, and requirements. It aims to improve quality and find errors early in the development lifecycle.
Avantages
- Effective at finding defects early; Improves the quality of software products.
Inconvénients
- Can be time-consuming and require significant preparation; Requires trained participants.
Catégories :
- Ingénierie, Qualité
Idéal pour :
- Reviewing critical software components or documents to ensure their quality and correctness.
Formal Technical Reviews find applications across various industries such as automotive, aerospace, software development, and healthcare, where the reliability and safety of systems are paramount. This methodology is particularly effective during the requirements analysis and design phases of software projects, serving as a disciplined approach for evaluating software artifacts. Teams typically consist of a moderator, authors of the artifacts under review, reviewers who are subject matter experts, and stakeholders who provide insights on requirements and expectations. Initiators of the review may include project managers or quality assurance leads who recognize the necessity of maintaining high-quality standards. The review process can be implemented iteratively throughout the development cycle, allowing for early detection of defects before the product moves into later stages, significantly reducing the cost and effort required to rectify issues later. Regularly scheduled reviews can also facilitate knowledge sharing among team members, helping to align the understanding of requirements and design across the group, thereby promoting consistency and coherence in the development effort. The discipline of Formal Technical Reviews can also support compliance with industry regulations and standards, making it a preferred strategy in sectors such as pharmaceuticals and defense, where documentation of quality processes is often mandated.
Principales étapes de cette méthodologie
- Conduct a pre-review meeting to outline objectives and roles.
- Review the software artifacts individually to identify potential defects.
- Group discussion of findings, focusing on defects discovered during the review.
- Document defects and areas for improvement identified during the discussion.
- Establish action items and assign responsibilities for addressing defects.
- Ensure that all participants understand their roles in the follow-up process.
Conseils de pro
- Establish clear criteria for success to guide the review process, ensuring all participants understand the priorities and expectations.
- Encourage diverse roles during reviews, such as technical leaders and non-technical stakeholders, to leverage varying perspectives for deeper analysis.
- Integrate review outcomes into a continuous feedback loop, ensuring lessons learned are documented and inform subsequent development phases.
Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le
> Référentiel méthodologique étendu <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.
Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.
Articles Similaires
Calculateur de METS en calories
Méta-analyse
Cartographie des messages
Diagrammes du modèle mental
Forces de poussée et de traction maximales acceptables
Planification des besoins en matériaux (MRP)