Error Guessing

Error Guessing

Error Guessing

Objectif :

To identify defects in logiciel by anticipating errors that are likely to occur.

Comment il est utilisé :

Avantages

Inconvénients

Catégories :

Idéal pour :

Error Guessing is particularly effective in industries where software applications demand high reliability and user satisfaction, such as finance, healthcare, and aerospace. Testers with extensive experience in these fields often initiate Error Guessing during the testing phases, especially when prior incidents or user feedback have indicated vulnerable areas. This method shines in exploratory testing sessions, where knowledge of the application’s architecture or past bugs can guide testers to focus on high-risk components that formal testing might overlook. It also encourages collaboration among team members, as discussions can arise about potential fail points based on diverse experiences and insights. In agile environments, where quick iterations are commonplace, Error Guessing can complement automated testing frameworks by targeting areas not sufficiently covered by scripted tests. Participants in this process typically include senior testers or developers who possess deep domain knowledge, ensuring that their intuition aligns with real-world usage scenarios. Moreover, applying this technique during regression testing phases can reveal defects introduced by new changes, thus enhancing product stability as updates are implemented. This method stands out due to its flexibility and adaptability, making it a valuable addition in diverse contexts, particularly where the stakes of failure are significantly high.

Principales étapes de cette méthodologie

  1. Identify high-risk areas based on system knowledge and complexity.
  2. Use intuition to hypothesize potential failure points in the application.
  3. Design exploratory tests around the guessed areas of failure.
  4. Execute the tests while varying conditions and parameters to uncover defects.
  5. Adjust testing focus based on findings and intuition during the process.
  6. Repeat the guessing and testing cycle for continuously evolving areas.
  7. Collaborate with domain experts to refine understanding of potential issues.

Conseils de pro

  • Utilize experience from previous projects to identify patterns of failure, focusing on areas where similar systems have struggled.
  • Engage in exploratory testing sessions with diverse team members to blend different perspectives on potential weak points in the application.
  • Keep a comprehensive log of past errors encountered and use this data to guide future guessing in areas of likelihood and severity.

Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le

> Référentiel méthodologique étendu  <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.

Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Articles Similaires

Retour en haut