A team-oriented, structured problem-solving methodology, typically used to address and resolve recurring or complex quality problems, often in manufacturing.
- Méthodologies : Ingénierie, Qualité
Les huit disciplines de la résolution de problèmes (8D)

Les huit disciplines de la résolution de problèmes (8D)
- Amélioration continue, Action corrective, Huit disciplines Résolution de problèmes (8D), Techniques de résolution de problèmes, Assurance qualité, Contrôle de qualité, Gestion de la qualité, Analyse des causes profondes, Travail d'équipe
Objectif :
Comment il est utilisé :
- Follows eight disciplined steps: D1: Establish the Team, D2: Describe the Problem, D3: Implement and Verify Interim Containment Actions, D4: Determine and Verify Root Cause(s), D5: Choose and Verify Permanent Corrective Actions, D6: Implement and Validate Permanent Corrective Actions, D7: Prevent Recurrence, D8: Congratulate the Team.
Avantages
- Provides a thorough and systematic approach to problem-solving; Emphasizes teamwork and data-driven analysis; Focuses on identifying root causes and implementing permanent solutions; Aims to prevent problem recurrence.
Inconvénients
- Can be lengthy and resource-intensive, especially for complex problems; Requires a committed and knowledgeable team; May be too rigorous for very simple problems; Documentation can be extensive.
Catégories :
- Lean Sigma, Fabrication, Résolution de problèmes, Qualité
Idéal pour :
- Solving complex or recurring quality problems in a structured, team-based manner to ensure thorough root cause analysis and effective corrective actions.
Le Huit disciplines de Résolution de problèmes (8D) methodology is widely applicable across various industries such as automotive, aerospace, manufacturing, and healthcare, particularly in contexts where product or service quality is paramount. It initiates during the product development or quality management phases, often prompted by recurring issues or significant failures that require a structured approach for resolution. Typically, a cross-functional team is formed, comprising members from engineering, quality assurance, production, and supply chain, ensuring a diversity of viewpoints and expertise. The structured nature fosters collaboration and accountability, as team members engage in brainstorming sessions to thoroughly describe the problem and identify interim containment actions, thereby minimizing immediate impacts on customers and operations. The process progresses to systematically analyze data for root causes, ensuring that any identified solutions are validated and implemented in a manner that is sustainable. This methodology not only addresses existing issues but also builds a framework for prevention, encouraging organizations to document the learnings and reinforce practices that deter future occurrences. Congratulating the team at the end underscores the importance of recognizing collective efforts, thus promoting a culture of continuous improvement and engagement, while also enhancing team dynamics and morale. The integration of 8D into everyday operations can significantly reduce defect rates and elevate overall customer satisfaction through a commitment to quality and systemic problem resolution.
Principales étapes de cette méthodologie
- Establish the Team to tackle the problem effectively.
- Describe the Problem with specific details and measurable criteria.
- Implement and Verify Interim Containment Actions to mitigate impact.
- Determine and Verify Root Cause(s) through analysis.
- Choose and Verify Permanent Corrective Actions based on root cause findings.
- Implement and Validate Permanent Corrective Actions to ensure effectiveness.
- Prevent Recurrence by updating processes and conducting training.
- Congratulate the Team for their effort in solving the problem.
Conseils de pro
- Utilize cross-functional teams to leverage diverse expertise for broader problem perspectives in D1.
- In D4, apply the “5 Whys” technique rigorously to drill down to systemic root causes, avoiding superficial analysis.
- In D7, develop a systematic feedback loop to monitor implemented corrective actions for sustained effectiveness.
Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le
> Référentiel méthodologique étendu <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.
Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.
Articles Similaires
Questionnaires sur les troubles musculo-squelettiques
Tests à plusieurs variables (MVT)
Analyse de régression multiple
Systèmes de capture de mouvement
Méthode MoSCoW
Test de la médiane de Mood