An organization (Cornell University Ergonomie) and a label for the various ergonomique tools, checklists, and guidelines developed at Cornell University.
- Méthodologies : Ingénierie, Conception de Produits, Gestion de projet
CUErgo

CUErgo
- Amélioration continue, Conception pour Six Sigma (DfSS), Ergonomie, Facteurs humains, Ingénierie des facteurs humains (HFE), Amélioration des processus, Assurance qualité, Contrôle de qualité, Gestion de la qualité
Objectif :
Comment il est utilisé :
- This is not a single tool, but rather a collective name for the resources provided by Cornell's ergonomics department, such as the Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires, retour sur investissement estimators, and various checklists.
Avantages
- Provides a suite of research-based, practical tools for ergonomic assessment; many tools are freely available and widely used; resources cover a broad range of ergonomic topics.
Inconvénients
- The tools are specific and may not cover all ergonomic needs; effective use often requires some background knowledge in ergonomics.
Catégories :
- Ergonomie, Ressources humaines, Gestion des risques
Idéal pour :
- Applying a range of scientifically-backed tools for assessing and improving workplace ergonomics.
CUErgo offers a versatile suite of resources most beneficial during the design and assessment phases of products and work environments, particularly in industries such as manufacturing, healthcare, and office settings, where ergonomic considerations are paramount. Initiatives can be dirigé by ergonomists, safety officers, or design engineers collaborating with employees to assess physical demands and workspace configurations using tools like the Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires to gather data on user comfort and pain levels. The ROI estimators allow businesses to quantify the financial benefits of implementing ergonomic solutions, enhancing the case for investment in ergonomic improvements. Various checklists facilitate systematic evaluations of workstation design, workstation layout, and equipment used, guiding teams through compliance with established ergonomic standards. The accessibility of many of these resources furthers engagement, allowing organizations of all sizes to integrate scientifically-backed assessments into their existing processes. This methodology promotes continuous improvement and a proactive approach to mitigating risks associated with musculoskeletal disorders, leading to enhanced productivity and employee satisfaction. Collaboration among diverse team members, from ressources humaines to operational managers, is encouraged to ensure a comprehensive understanding of ergonomic principles and their practical applications within specific contexts, thereby optimizing both employee well-being and organizational efficiency.
Principales étapes de cette méthodologie
- Select relevant ergonomic assessment tools from the CUErgo resources based on the specific workplace context.
- Utilize Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires to evaluate employee discomfort and identify risk factors.
- Apply ROI estimators to calculate the potential financial benefits of ergonomic interventions.
- Conduct ergonomic checklists to assess workplace setups against established ergonomic standards.
- Implement intervention strategies based on assessment findings and ensure appropriate solutions are applied.
- Assess the effectiveness of implemented ergonomic solutions using follow-up assessments and feedback.
- Maintain an iterative process of continual assessment and improvement for workplace ergonomics.
Conseils de pro
- Utilize Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires to identify specific areas of concern, enabling targeted interventions for discomfort reduction.
- Apply ROI estimators to quantify the financial benefits of ergonomic improvements, fostering evidence-based decision-making for investments in safety and comfort.
- Incorporate checklists for workstation assessments to ensure consistent evaluations across environments, minimizing oversight in ergonomic practices.
Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le
> Référentiel méthodologique étendu <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.
Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.
Articles Similaires
Gestion des opérations de fabrication (MOM)
Système d'exécution de la fabrication (MES)
Plan de contrôle de la fabrication
Tests manuels
Tableaux d'évaluation des manutentions manuelles (MAC)
ManTRA (outil d'évaluation des risques liés aux tâches manuelles)