Méthodologies : Ergonomie, Gestion des risques

Examen du code

Méthodologie Agile, Amélioration continue, Examen de la conception, Assurance qualité, Contrôle de qualité, Logiciel, Ingénierie logicielle, Software Testing

Examen du code

Méthodologie Agile, Amélioration continue, Examen de la conception, Assurance qualité, Contrôle de qualité, Logiciel, Ingénierie logicielle, Software Testing

Objectif :

A systematic examination of computer source code. It is intended to find mistakes overlooked in the initial development phase, improving the overall quality of logiciel.

Comment il est utilisé :

One or more developers, who were not involved in writing the code, check it for bugs, logic errors, and conformance to coding standards before it is merged into the main codebase.

Avantages

Improves code quality and reduces bugs, serves as a knowledge-sharing tool for the team, and ensures adherence to coding standards.

Inconvénients

Can be time-consuming, may cause delays in development if not managed well, and its effectiveness depends on the thoroughness of the reviewer.

Catégories :

Ingénierie, Gestion de projet, Qualité

Idéal pour :

Improving software quality and fostering knowledge sharing by having peers systematically check source code for errors.

In the realm of software development, the Code Review methodology typically takes place during the integration phase of a project, where code from individual developers is prepared for merging into a shared repository. This review process is not limited to ensuring quality but also serves as a training ground for less experienced developers. Many tech companies, such as Google and Microsoft, implement Code Review practices to enhance team collaboration and promote a culture of continuous learning. Participants in Code Review often include software engineers, quality assurance testers, and sometimes even product managers, as they bring diverse perspectives that can improve the overall functionality and usability of the software. This methodology finds application in various industries, from fintech, where adherence to security standards is fundamental, to healthcare, where software must comply with strict regulatory requirements. By integrating automated tools alongside manual reviews, teams can efficiently identify discrepancies or enforce compliance with accessibility and performance guidelines. As a result, the practice of Code Review not only elevates the quality of the codebase but also significantly boosts team coherence and imparts shared knowledge that contributes to professional development in technical abilities and best coding practices.

Principales étapes de cette méthodologie

Perform a thorough examination of the code for syntax errors and bugs.
Check for adherence to defined coding standards and best practices.
Verify logic and algorithm efficiency, ensuring optimal execution.
Evaluate the clarity of variable names and code structure for maintainability.
Assess test coverage and the effectiveness of existing unit tests.
Discuss findings with the author for clarification and learning opportunities.
Apply suggestions and corrections before final approval of the code merge.

Conseils de pro

Incorporate automated tools for static code analysis within the review process to flag potential issues early.
Implement a checklist for reviewers that highlights common pitfalls and checks for adherence to design patterns.
Encourage reviewers to provide constructive feedback and suggest alternative solutions, promoting a culture of continuous improvement.

Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le

> Référentiel méthodologique étendu <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.

Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.