Verification and validation (V&V) are distinct processes. Verification ensures a product meets its specified requirements (“Are you building it right?”). Validation ensures the product meets the user’s actual needs and intended use (“Are you building the right thing?”). They are complementary activities within quality management, often performed sequentially or in parallel to ensure both correctness and usefulness.
Verification vs. Validation
- Barry Boehm
The distinction between verification and validation is fundamental to quality assurance in any complex engineering discipline, particularly software and systems engineering. Verification is an internal quality process focused on compliance with specifications. It involves activities like reviews, inspections, and walkthroughs of design documents, code, and requirements. The goal is to find defects early in the development lifecycle. For example, a code review verifies that the software adheres to coding standards and correctly implements a specific algorithm as described in a design document.
Validation, on the other hand, is an external quality process focused on fitness for purpose. It assesses whether the final product is effective in the operational environment for which it was intended. This typically involves testing the product with actual users or in a simulated real-world environment. For instance, user acceptance testing (UAT) is a validation activity where end-users test the software to see if it helps them perform their tasks efficiently and effectively. A system can be perfectly verified—meaning it has no bugs and meets all documented specifications—but still fail validation if those specifications were flawed or did not accurately capture the user’s true needs.
Barry Boehm’s work emphasized that these two activities answer different questions and are crucial for delivering a successful product. Neglecting verification leads to a buggy, unreliable product, while neglecting validation leads to a product that, while technically sound, is ultimately useless to its intended audience. The two processes work in tandem to ensure both correctness and usefulness.
Type
Disruption
Utilisation
Precursors
- early concepts of quality control in manufacturing
- formal logic and proof theory
- structured programming principles
- early software testing methodologies
Applications
- agile software development methodologies
- systems engineering lifecycle models (e.g., v-model)
- pharmaceutical drug development protocols
- aerospace systems certification (e.g., DO-178C)
- medical device approval processes (e.g., FDA regulations)
Brevets :
Potential Innovations Ideas
!niveaux !!! Adhésion obligatoire
Vous devez être membre de l'association pour accéder à ce contenu.
DISPONIBLE POUR DE NOUVEAUX DÉFIS
Ingénieur mécanique, chef de projet ou de R&D
Disponible pour un nouveau défi dans un court délai.
Contactez-moi sur LinkedIn
Intégration électronique métal-plastique, Conception à coût réduit, BPF, Ergonomie, Appareils et consommables de volume moyen à élevé, Secteurs réglementés, CE et FDA, CAO, Solidworks, Lean Sigma Black Belt, ISO 13485 médical
Nous recherchons un nouveau sponsor
Votre entreprise ou institution est dans le domaine de la technique, de la science ou de la recherche ?
> envoyez-nous un message <
Recevez tous les nouveaux articles
Gratuit, pas de spam, email non distribué ni revendu
ou vous pouvez obtenir votre adhésion complète - gratuitement - pour accéder à tout le contenu restreint >ici<
Historical Context
Verification vs. Validation
(if date is unknown or not relevant, e.g. "fluid mechanics", a rounded estimation of its notable emergence is provided)
Related Invention, Innovation & Technical Principles