A thorough evaluation of a website or application to determine its level of accessibility for people with disabilities.
- Metodologías: Ingeniería, Diseño de producto, Gestión de proyectos
Accessibility Audit

Accessibility Audit
- Pensamiento de diseño, Ergonomía, Interacción Persona-Ordenador, Usabilidad, Experiencia de usuario (UX), Interfaz de usuario (UI), Pruebas de usuario, Diseño centrado en el usuario
Objetivo:
Cómo se utiliza:
- An accessibility audit assesses a digital product against accessibility standards (like WCAG) and provides a report on issues and recommendations for improvement. Audits can be manual, automated, or a hybrid of both.
Ventajas
- Ensures equal access to information for all users, improves user experience, and helps comply with legal requirements.
Contras
- Can be expensive and time-consuming, and automated tools may not catch all accessibility issues.
Categorías:
- Clientes y marketing, Diseño de producto, Calidad
Ideal para:
- Ensuring a website or application is usable by people with disabilities.
An accessibility audit serves as a thorough examination of digital products, allowing organizations to identify and rectify barriers that people with disabilities may encounter. This methodology is commonly employed during initial design, redesign, or post-launch phases of website and application development, ensuring that accessibility is integrated throughout the product lifecycle. Industries such as e-commerce, education, government, and healthcare frequently utilize audits to enhance user engagement and compliance with regulations like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or Section 508. Stakeholders, including UX designers, developers, project managers, and quality assurance teams, collaborate in the audit process, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered in evaluating the digital product. The combination of automated tools and manual assessments allows for a robust and comprehensive evaluation, identifying issues like color contrast, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility. Addressing the findings of an accessibility audit not only enhances usability for individuals with disabilities but also fosters a more inclusive environment that benefits all users by simplifying navigation and content consumption. Employing this methodology can result in positive public sentiment and increased customer loyalty, as organizations demonstrate their commitment to accessibility and diversity.
Pasos clave de esta metodología
- Identify key accessibility standards relevant to the digital product, such as WCAG.
- Conduct a preliminary automated scan of the website or application using accessibility testing tools.
- Perform a manual review, checking for compliance with identified accessibility standards.
- Include usability testing with users who have disabilities to identify real-world accessibility issues.
- Identify and categorize accessibility issues based on severity and impact.
- Prioritize issues and provide recommendations for remediation per issue category.
- Review and validate the findings with stakeholders to ensure accurate feedback.
- Create a follow-up plan for re-evaluation after recommended changes are implemented.
Consejos profesionales
- Incorporate user testing with individuals who have disabilities during the audit process to uncover nuanced usability challenges that automated tools may miss.
- Utilize ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and properties judiciously; improper implementation can create more barriers than it resolves.
- Prioritize findings from the audit according to impact and frequency of use, focusing on high-traffic pages and essential functionalities for remediation efforts.
Leer y comparar varias metodologías, recomendamos el
> Amplio repositorio de metodologías <
junto con otras más de 400 metodologías.
Sus comentarios sobre esta metodología o información adicional son bienvenidos en la dirección sección de comentarios ↓ , así como cualquier idea o enlace relacionado con la ingeniería.
Publicaciones relacionadas
Simulación de Monte Carlo
Pruebas basadas en modelos
Comprobación de modelos
Investigación con métodos mixtos
A prueba de errores (Poka-Yoke)
Pruebas del perfil de la misión