德尔菲法

德尔菲法

德尔菲法

目标

To achieve a consensus on a specific topic or forecast future 事件 by surveying a panel of experts through multiple rounds of questionnaires.

如何使用

优点

缺点

类别

最适合:

The Delphi Method is particularly effective in scenarios such as technological forecasting, where opinions about future advancements and their potential impacts are sought, making it suitable for industries like pharmaceuticals, information technology, and telecommunications, where expert projections influence R&D investments and strategic direction. Its application extends to project management phases that involve risk assessment, market analysis, and policy development, allowing organizations to harness expert knowledge during the planning and ideation stages. Participants typically include a broad range of experts from academia, industry, and government, which enriches the depth of analysis and encourages interdisciplinary collaboration. The anonymity of responses not only lowers the pressure on experts to conform to majority views but also promotes a richer variety of ideas and perspectives. Facilitators can effectively manage the process to mitigate 偏见, ensuring that less vocal experts still contribute meaningful insights. Results generated through multiple rounds offer a quantified representation of expert sentiment, aiding in the identification of trends and uncertainties that may not be obvious at first glance. As such, it serves as a strategic tool for decision-makers looking to derive consensus on innovative solutions or emerging challenges where empirical data is limited or non-existent.

该方法的关键步骤

  1. Define the specific issue or topic for the Delphi study.
  2. Select a diverse panel of experts relevant to the topic.
  3. Conduct the first round of surveys to gather expert opinions anonymously.
  4. Analyze the responses and identify key themes or points of agreement and disagreement.
  5. Provide a summary of findings back to the experts for further consideration.
  6. Facilitate subsequent rounds of feedback, allowing experts to revise their opinions.
  7. Repeat the feedback and revision process until consensus is approached.

专业提示

  • Incorporate diverse expertise by selecting panelists from various disciplines to enhance perspective breadth and minimize biases.
  • Utilize iterative feedback intervals efficiently, ensuring each round is brief and focused on specific themes to maintain engagement and clarity.
  • Document and analyze changes in expert opinions between rounds to identify patterns or shifts that inform consensus-building effectively.

阅读和比较几种方法、 我们建议

> 广泛的方法论资料库  <
以及其他 400 多种方法。

欢迎您就此方法发表评论或提供更多信息,请登录 下面的评论区 ↓ ,因此任何与工程相关的想法或链接都是如此。

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

相关文章

滚动至顶部