Un site ergonomique checklist specifically designed to evaluate the setup of computer workstations in digital reading rooms and similar environments.
- Méthodologies : Ingénierie, Conception de Produits, Gestion de projet
Cornell Digital Reading Room Ergonomics Checklist (CDRREC)

Cornell Digital Reading Room Ergonomics Checklist (CDRREC)
- Ergonomie, Facteurs humains, Ingénierie des facteurs humains (HFE), Conception centrée sur l'humain, Interaction homme-machine, Utilisabilité, Tests d'utilisabilité, Expérience utilisateur (UX), User-Centered Design
Objectif :
Comment il est utilisé :
- This tool guides an evaluator through a checklist of items related to chair, monitor, keyboard, mouse, and lighting setup to identify and mitigate ergonomic risks for computer users.
Avantages
- Specifically tailored for digital reading environments, provides a structured and easy-to-use format, and helps to systematically identify common workstation ergonomic issues.
Inconvénients
- Is specific to computer workstations and may not be applicable to other tasks, acts as a screening tool that may require a more detailed follow-up assessment.
Catégories :
- Ergonomie, Ressources humaines, Gestion des risques
Idéal pour :
- Evaluating and improving the ergonomic setup of computer workstations, particularly in academic or reading-intensive settings.
The Cornell Digital Reading Room Ergonomics Checklist (CDRREC) serves as a valuable resource for educators, researchers, and facility managers aiming to enhance ergonomic standards within workspaces specifically designed for reading and digital engagement. Often utilized in academic institutions, libraries, and corporate offices, this methodology becomes relevant during the design and evaluation phases of workspace development, where user comfort and productivity are essential considerations. The checklist prompts evaluators to assess various components such as chair height, monitor positioning, keyboard and mouse placement, and lighting conditions, offering a straightforward approach to pinpointing ergonomic issues. This can lead to reduced physical strain and potential injuries among users, encouraging sustainable work habits over extended periods of computer use. Stakeholders, including ergonomists, occupational health experts, and workspace designers, can initiate this process by conducting assessments and implementing recommended changes based on the findings of the CDRREC. Regular audits and reviews of ergonomic setups are encouraged, ensuring that adaptations to furniture and technology keep pace with evolving user needs and emerging research on best practices. In environments where prolonged digital interaction is common, such as in academic libraries or reading-intensive office roles, utilizing the CDRREC not only enhances individual user experience but can also boost overall institutional productivity and engagement.
Principales étapes de cette méthodologie
- Evaluate chair height and adjust to ensure feet rest flat on the floor.
- Check desk height to allow elbows to be at a 90-degree angle when typing.
- Position monitor at eye level, about an arm's length away.
- Assess keyboard position; it should be level with the elbows and not raised.
- Place mouse within easy reach, aligned with the keyboard.
- Review lighting to minimize glare on the screen and ensure adequate illumination of the workspace.
- Consider document placement to reduce neck strain while reading or referencing materials.
- Encourage regular breaks to reduce fatigue and strain during prolonged use.
Conseils de pro
- Incorporate adjustable elements such as seat height and lumbar support to accommodate a wider user range and ensure proper posture during prolonged reading sessions.
- Evaluate the monitor placement and ensure it is at eye level, with a distance that minimizes glare while allowing readability, thereby reducing neck strain.
- Implement color temperature adjustments for lighting that mimic natural daylight, as this can enhance focus and reduce eye fatigue during extensive digital reading activities.
Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le
> Référentiel méthodologique étendu <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.
Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.
Articles Similaires
Questionnaires sur les troubles musculo-squelettiques
Tests à plusieurs variables (MVT)
Analyse de régression multiple
Systèmes de capture de mouvement
Méthode MoSCoW
Test de la médiane de Mood