Accessibility Audit

Accessibility Audit

Accessibility Audit

Objectif :

A thorough evaluation of a website or application to determine its level of accessibility for people with disabilities.

Comment il est utilisé :

Avantages

Inconvénients

Catégories :

Idéal pour :

An accessibility audit serves as a thorough examination of digital products, allowing organizations to identify and rectify barriers that people with disabilities may encounter. This methodology is commonly employed during initial design, redesign, or post-launch phases of website and application development, ensuring that accessibility is integrated throughout the product lifecycle. Industries such as e-commerce, education, government, and healthcare frequently utilize audits to enhance user engagement and compliance with regulations like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or Section 508. Stakeholders, including UX designers, developers, project managers, and quality assurance teams, collaborate in the audit process, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered in evaluating the digital product. The combination of automated tools and manual assessments allows for a robust and comprehensive evaluation, identifying issues like color contrast, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility. Addressing the findings of an accessibility audit not only enhances usability for individuals with disabilities but also fosters a more inclusive environment that benefits all users by simplifying navigation and content consumption. Employing this methodology can result in positive public sentiment and increased customer loyalty, as organizations demonstrate their commitment to accessibility and diversity.

Principales étapes de cette méthodologie

  1. Identify key accessibility standards relevant to the digital product, such as WCAG.
  2. Conduct a preliminary automated scan of the website or application using accessibility testing tools.
  3. Perform a manual review, checking for compliance with identified accessibility standards.
  4. Include usability testing with users who have disabilities to identify real-world accessibility issues.
  5. Identify and categorize accessibility issues based on severity and impact.
  6. Prioritize issues and provide recommendations for remediation per issue category.
  7. Review and validate the findings with stakeholders to ensure accurate feedback.
  8. Create a follow-up plan for re-evaluation after recommended changes are implemented.

Conseils de pro

  • Incorporate user testing with individuals who have disabilities during the audit process to uncover nuanced usability challenges that automated tools may miss.
  • Utilize ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and properties judiciously; improper implementation can create more barriers than it resolves.
  • Prioritize findings from the audit according to impact and frequency of use, focusing on high-traffic pages and essential functionalities for remediation efforts.

Lire et comparer plusieurs méthodologies, nous recommandons le

> Référentiel méthodologique étendu  <
ainsi que plus de 400 autres méthodologies.

Vos commentaires sur cette méthodologie ou des informations supplémentaires sont les bienvenus sur le site web de la Commission européenne. section des commentaires ci-dessous ↓ , ainsi que toute idée ou lien en rapport avec l'ingénierie.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Articles Similaires

Retour en haut