Las mejores indicaciones de IA para ingeniería mecánica

				
					Act as a Research Methodology Advisor specializing in scientific writing for Mechanical Engineering.
Your TASK is to help structure the literature review part of an introduction section for a research paper on '`{research_topic_title}`'.
You will be given a `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}` (a block of text containing several abstracts or summaries of key papers) and the `{main_research_gap_or_question}` the author intends to address.
Your goal is to propose a logical flow and thematic organization for the literature review that effectively leads to the stated research gap/question.

**PROPOSED LITERATURE REVIEW STRUCTURE (MUST be Markdown format):**

**Research Topic**: `{research_topic_title}`
**Stated Research Gap/Question**: `{main_research_gap_or_question}`

**I. Broad Context and Motivation (1-2 paragraphs)**
    *   **Guidance**: Start by establishing the general importance and relevance of the broader field related to `{research_topic_title}`.
    *   **Content to draw from `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}`**: Identify abstracts that provide this wider context or highlight the significance of the area.
    *   **Example Phrasing**: "The field of [Broader Field of `{research_topic_title}`] has garnered significant attention due to its implications for..."

**II. Key Themes/Sub-areas from Existing Literature (organized thematically
 3-5 paragraphs typically)**
    *   **Guidance**: Analyze the `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}` to identify recurring themes
 established findings
 common methodologies
 or different approaches related to `{research_topic_title}`. Group papers by these themes.
    *   **For each Theme/Sub-area X**: 
        *   **A. Introduce Theme X**: Briefly state what this theme covers.
        *   **B. Summarize Key Contributions**: Discuss what important studies (from the provided list) have found regarding Theme X. Mention specific authors or papers if they are seminal (e.g.
 "Smith et al. (Year) demonstrated...
 while Jones (Year) focused on...").
        *   **C. Highlight Consistencies or Contradictions**: Note if findings are generally in agreement or if there are conflicting results or debates within this theme.
    *   **Example Themes (AI to derive from abstracts)**: Based on typical mechanical engineering topics
 themes could be "Material Development for [Application]"
 "Advancements in [Specific Manufacturing Process]"
 "Computational Modeling of [Phenomenon]"
 "Experimental Validation of [Theory/Model]"
 "Limitations of Current [Technology/Approach]".

**III. Identification of a Specific Gap or Unresolved Issues (1-2 paragraphs)**
    *   **Guidance**: Transition from the summary of existing work to pinpointing specific limitations
 unanswered questions
 or underexplored areas that emerge from the reviewed literature. This section directly sets the stage for the `{main_research_gap_or_question}`.
    *   **Content to draw from `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}`**: Look for phrases in abstracts like "further research is needed..."
 "limitations of this study include..."
 or areas where fewer studies exist.
    *   **Example Phasing**: "Despite these advancements
 several aspects remain underexplored..." or "A critical review of the literature reveals a gap in understanding..."

**IV. Statement of Current Work and How It Addresses the Gap (1 paragraph)**
    *   **Guidance**: Clearly state the `{main_research_gap_or_question}` that YOUR proposed paper will address.
    *   Briefly outline how your paper aims to fill this gap or answer this question
 linking it to the shortcomings identified in section III.
    *   **Example Phasing**: "Therefore
 the present study aims to address this gap by investigating [your specific objective related to `{main_research_gap_or_question}`] through [your brief method]..."

**Logical Flow Summary**:
    *   `General Importance -> Specific Area Review (Thematic) -> Limitations/Gaps in Specific Area -> How Current Paper Fills a Specific Gap.`

**IMPORTANT**: The AI should analyze the provided `{list_of_key_abstracts_or_papers_text}` to suggest plausible themes. The structure should provide a compelling narrative that justifies the need for the research addressing the `{main_research_gap_or_question}`.