The process of reviewing all types of documentation related to a project or system to ensure its accuracy, clarity, and completeness.
- Metodologías: Ideación, Resolución de problemas
Comprobación de la documentación

Comprobación de la documentación
- Documentación de diseño, Revisión del diseño, Mejora de procesos, Seguro de calidad, Control de calidad, Gestión de calidad, Sistema de gestión de la calidad (SGC), Verificación, Verificación y validación
Objetivo:
Cómo se utiliza:
- This can include reviewing requirements specifications, design documents, user manuals, and test plans to find errors, inconsistencies, or ambiguities.
Ventajas
- Ensures that all stakeholders have a clear and accurate understanding of the system; improves the quality and maintainability of the product; is a crucial part of quality assurance.
Contras
- Can be a very tedious and time-consuming manual process; it's easy to miss errors in large documents; keeping documentation up-to-date is a constant challenge.
Categorías:
- Ingeniería, Gestión de proyectos, Calidad
Ideal para:
- Verifying the accuracy and completeness of project documents, such as requirements and user manuals.
Documentation Checking is often integrated within the broader scope of software development and engineering processes, particularly during various stages such as requirements gathering, revisiones de diseño, and pre-release testing. This methodology proves useful in industries such as aerospace, automotive, software, and electronics, where precision is paramount due to safety regulations and user safety. The initiation of documentation checking typically involves project managers or quality assurance teams who organize review sessions, bringing together stakeholders, design engineers, product managers, and end-users to verify that documentation accurately reflects the intended functionalities and user requirements. This collaborative approach encourages feedback and identifies any discrepancies or ambiguities early in the project, thereby minimizing the risk of costly errors during later phases. The process addresses a range of documents including requirement specifications, design documents, and test plans, ensuring that they remain aligned with the project’s goals. Engaging in thorough documentation reviews often identifies areas for improvement, enhancing understanding among team members and increasing the likelihood of producing a well-documented system, which is easier to maintain and modify in the future. Regular documentation checks also promote best practices in writing clear and concise manuals that can directly enhance user experience and satisfaction by providing accurate guidance. In regulated industries, consistent documentation review practices can facilitate compliance with industry standards and aid in passing audits, protecting organizations from potential liabilities. By embedding these practices into project workflows, teams can cultivate a culture of quality and accountability that is reflected in the final product.
Pasos clave de esta metodología
- Identify all relevant documents to be checked, such as requirements specifications and design documents.
- Review each document for clarity and completeness, ensuring all necessary information is included.
- Cross-reference the documents to confirm consistency among requirements, designs, and user manuals.
- Check for compliance with industry standards and guidelines applicable to the project.
- Highlight any ambiguities or discrepancies for further discussion with stakeholders.
- Ensure all terminologies and concepts are clearly defined and understood.
- Document the findings in a clear format, indicating the severity of issues identified.
- Facilitate discussions with stakeholders to address identified issues and reach consensus on solutions.
- Update the documents as necessary based on stakeholder feedback and subsequent findings.
- Perform a final review of updated documents to verify that all issues have been resolved.
Consejos profesionales
- Employ automated tools for document comparison to quickly identify discrepancies and ensure alignment across all documentation.
- Implement a checklist tailored to specific project needs for thorough verification of compliance with defined standards and stakeholder expectations.
- Conduct regular peer reviews within cross-functional teams to leverage diverse expertise, which can unveil ambiguities and improve document clarity.
Leer y comparar varias metodologías, recomendamos el
> Amplio repositorio de metodologías <
junto con otras más de 400 metodologías.
Sus comentarios sobre esta metodología o información adicional son bienvenidos en la dirección sección de comentarios ↓ , así como cualquier idea o enlace relacionado con la ingeniería.
Publicaciones relacionadas
Cuestionarios sobre molestias musculoesqueléticas
Pruebas multivariantes (MVT)
Análisis de regresión múltiple
Sistemas de captura de movimiento
Método MoSCoW
Prueba de la mediana de Mood