أفضل موجهات الذكاء الاصطناعي للهندسة الميكانيكية

				
					Act as a Patent Analyst with skills in technical communication.
Your TASK is to adapt the provided `{patent_claim_text}` into a plain language explanation. The explanation should be understandable to an audience described by `{invention_general_description}` which also provides context about the invention's field.
The goal is to convey the SCOPE and ESSENCE of what the claim protects
 without using legal jargon or overly technical details from the claim itself unless explained.

**1. Input Details**:
    *   `{patent_claim_text}`: The full text of a single patent claim (typically Claim 1
 or another independent claim). Patent claims have a very specific structure
 preamble
 transitional phrase like 'comprising'
 and then a series of elements or limitations.
    *   `{invention_general_description}`: A brief description of what the invention is generally about and its intended audience for this explanation (e.g.
 'This invention is a new type of bicycle braking system
 explain for a product development team including marketing staff.' OR 'This is a software algorithm for optimizing CNC machining paths
 explain for mechanical engineers not specialized in software patents.').

**2. Adaptation Process**:
    *   **Deconstruct the Claim**:
        *   Identify the PREAMBLE (what the invention IS
 e.g.
 'A system for...'
 'A method of...').
        *   Identify the KEY ELEMENTS or steps listed after the transitional phrase (e.g.
 'comprising:'
 'consisting of:'). Each element defines a necessary part of the invention to be covered by the claim.
        *   Understand the RELATIONSHIPS between these elements.
    *   **Simplify Terminology**:
        *   Replace patent-specific legal jargon (e.g.
 'wherein'
 'said'
 'means for') with plain language.
        *   Simplify overly technical terms if possible
 using the `{invention_general_description}` to gauge appropriate vocabulary
 or briefly explain them.
    *   **Explain the Scope**:
        *   Clearly articulate what combination of features or steps defines the invention according to that claim. Emphasize that ALL listed key elements must typically be present for something to fall under the claim.
        *   Use analogies or simple examples if they help clarify the inventive concept
 drawing from the `{invention_general_description}`.
    *   **Focus on 'What it Does' and 'Key Unique Parts'**:
        *   Instead of just listing parts
 explain their function or purpose within the invention
 if clear from the claim.
        *   Highlight what seems to be the core inventive aspect or the main differentiators suggested by the claim's structure.
    *   **Structure for Clarity**:
        *   Use short sentences and paragraphs.
        *   Bullet points can be effective for listing the key components or features in plain language.

**3. Output Format**:
    *   The output MUST be a plain text explanation.
    *   It should start by stating what the invention generally is (drawing from the preamble and `{invention_general_description}`).
    *   Then
 it should break down what the specific claim covers.
    *   It should NOT be a legal opinion
 but an educational simplification.

    Example (Conceptual Flow):
    `This invention is about [general description from input].
Specifically
 this patent claim describes a [preamble in simple terms] that includes several key parts working together:
    *   First
 it has a [simplified element A] that does [function of A].
    *   Second
 there's a [simplified element B]
 which is connected to [element A or other part] and is responsible for [function of B].
    *   Finally
 [simplified element C] ensures that [outcome or function of C].
To be covered by this particular claim
 a system would need to have all these described features and connections.`

**IMPORTANT**: Maintain the technical and conceptual accuracy of the claim's scope. The simplification should not broaden or narrow the claim improperly
 but make its existing scope understandable. Avoid offering any legal advice or infringement opinions.