A systematic examination of computer source code. It is intended to find mistakes overlooked in the initial development phase, improving the overall quality of software.
- Metodologías: Ideación, Resolución de problemas
Code Review

Code Review
- Metodología ágil, Mejora continua, Revisión del diseño, Seguro de calidad, Control de calidad, Software, Ingeniería de software, Pruebas de software
Objetivo:
Cómo se utiliza:
- One or more developers, who were not involved in writing the code, check it for bugs, logic errors, and conformance to coding standards before it is merged into the main codebase.
Ventajas
- Improves code quality and reduces bugs, serves as a knowledge-sharing tool for the team, and ensures adherence to coding standards.
Contras
- Can be time-consuming, may cause delays in development if not managed well, and its effectiveness depends on the thoroughness of the reviewer.
Categorías:
- Ingeniería, Gestión de proyectos, Calidad
Ideal para:
- Improving software quality and fostering knowledge sharing by having peers systematically check source code for errors.
In the realm of software development, the Code Review methodology typically takes place during the integration phase of a project, where code from individual developers is prepared for merging into a shared repository. This review process is not limited to ensuring quality but also serves as a training ground for less experienced developers. Many tech companies, such as Google and Microsoft, implement Code Review practices to enhance team collaboration and promote a culture of continuous learning. Participants in Code Review often include software engineers, quality assurance testers, and sometimes even product managers, as they bring diverse perspectives that can improve the overall functionality and usability of the software. This methodology finds application in various industries, from fintech, where adherence to security standards is fundamental, to healthcare, where software must comply with strict regulatory requirements. By integrating automated tools alongside manual reviews, teams can efficiently identify discrepancies or enforce compliance with accessibility and performance guidelines. As a result, the practice of Code Review not only elevates the quality of the codebase but also significantly boosts team coherence and imparts shared knowledge that contributes to professional development in technical abilities and best coding practices.
Pasos clave de esta metodología
- Perform a thorough examination of the code for syntax errors and bugs.
- Check for adherence to defined coding standards and best practices.
- Verify logic and algorithm efficiency, ensuring optimal execution.
- Evaluate the clarity of variable names and code structure for maintainability.
- Assess test coverage and the effectiveness of existing unit tests.
- Discuss findings with the author for clarification and learning opportunities.
- Apply suggestions and corrections before final approval of the code merge.
Consejos profesionales
- Incorporate automated tools for static code analysis within the review process to flag potential issues early.
- Implement a checklist for reviewers that highlights common pitfalls and checks for adherence to design patterns.
- Encourage reviewers to provide constructive feedback and suggest alternative solutions, promoting a culture of continuous improvement.
Leer y comparar varias metodologías, recomendamos el
> Amplio repositorio de metodologías <
junto con otras más de 400 metodologías.
Sus comentarios sobre esta metodología o información adicional son bienvenidos en la dirección sección de comentarios ↓ , así como cualquier idea o enlace relacionado con la ingeniería.
Publicaciones relacionadas
Cuestionarios sobre molestias musculoesqueléticas
Pruebas multivariantes (MVT)
Análisis de regresión múltiple
Sistemas de captura de movimiento
Método MoSCoW
Prueba de la mediana de Mood