To achieve a consensus on a specific topic or forecast future الأحداث by surveying a panel of experts through multiple rounds of questionnaires.
- المنهجيات: الهندسة, الجودة
Delphi Method

Delphi Method
- إدارة التغيير, Methodology, إدارة المشاريع, التحليل الإحصائي
الهدف:
كيفية استخدامه:
- A facilitator collects anonymous opinions from a panel of experts on a specific issue. The results are summarized and fed back to the experts in subsequent rounds, allowing them to revise their opinions based on the group's collective response, until a consensus is approached.
الإيجابيات
- Allows for input from geographically dispersed experts; anonymity reduces the influence of dominant personalities and groupthink; provides a structured way to aggregate expert judgment.
السلبيات
- Can be time-consuming due to multiple rounds; relies on the expertise and commitment of the panel members; facilitator bias can influence outcomes.
الفئات:
- العملاء والتسويق, حل المشكلات, إدارة المشاريع, إدارة المخاطر
الأفضل لـ
- Forecasting future trends, or reaching expert consensus on complex issues where precise data is unavailable.
The Delphi Method is particularly effective in scenarios such as technological forecasting, where opinions about future advancements and their potential impacts are sought, making it suitable for industries like pharmaceuticals, information technology, and telecommunications, where expert projections influence R&D investments and strategic direction. Its application extends to project management phases that involve risk assessment, market analysis, and policy development, allowing organizations to harness expert knowledge during the planning and ideation stages. Participants typically include a broad range of experts from academia, industry, and government, which enriches the depth of analysis and encourages interdisciplinary collaboration. The anonymity of responses not only lowers the pressure on experts to conform to majority views but also promotes a richer variety of ideas and perspectives. Facilitators can effectively manage the process to mitigate التحيزات, ensuring that less vocal experts still contribute meaningful insights. Results generated through multiple rounds offer a quantified representation of expert sentiment, aiding in the identification of trends and uncertainties that may not be obvious at first glance. As such, it serves as a strategic tool for decision-makers looking to derive consensus on innovative solutions or emerging challenges where empirical data is limited or non-existent.
الخطوات الرئيسية لهذه المنهجية
- Define the specific issue or topic for the Delphi study.
- Select a diverse panel of experts relevant to the topic.
- Conduct the first round of surveys to gather expert opinions anonymously.
- Analyze the responses and identify key themes or points of agreement and disagreement.
- Provide a summary of findings back to the experts for further consideration.
- Facilitate subsequent rounds of feedback, allowing experts to revise their opinions.
- Repeat the feedback and revision process until consensus is approached.
نصائح للمحترفين
- Incorporate diverse expertise by selecting panelists from various disciplines to enhance perspective breadth and minimize biases.
- Utilize iterative feedback intervals efficiently, ensuring each round is brief and focused on specific themes to maintain engagement and clarity.
- Document and analyze changes in expert opinions between rounds to identify patterns or shifts that inform consensus-building effectively.
لقراءة عدة منهجيات ومقارنتها, نوصي باستخدام
> مستودع المنهجيات الشامل <
مع أكثر من 400 منهجية أخرى.
نرحب بتعليقاتكم على هذه المنهجية أو المعلومات الإضافية على قسم التعليقات أدناه ↓، وكذلك أي أفكار أو روابط متعلقة بالهندسة.
منشورات ذات صلة
استبيانات الانزعاج العضلي الهيكلي
الاختبار متعدد المتغيرات (MVT)
تحليل الانحدار المتعدد
أنظمة التقاط الحركة
طريقة MoSCoW
اختبار متوسط المزاج